• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本低危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行主动脉瓣置换术后的临床转归。

Clinical outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk Japanese patients with severe aortic stenosis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

Division of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan;36(1):121-130. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00658-2. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s12928-020-00658-2
PMID:32170553
Abstract

Two randomized control trials demonstrated that transcatheter aortic valve implantation was associated with 1-2 year clinical outcomes comparable or even superior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, no previous study has reported the clinical outcomes after SAVR in Japanese patients with low surgical risk. From 3815 consecutive patients enrolled in the CURRENT AS registry, we retrieved 220 patients who underwent SAVR in reference to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the PARTNER 3 trial. Age and surgical risk score in the current study population were comparable to those in the PARTNER 3 trial (Age: 75 years versus 74 years, and STS-PROM score: 2.3 versus 1.9). The cumulative incidence of a composite all-cause death or stroke was comparable between the current study population and the SAVR patients in the PARTNER 3 trial both at 30-day (2.3% versus 3.3%), and at 1-year (4.1% versus 4.9%). The clinical outcomes of SAVR in low surgical risk patients with severe AS selected from a real world Japanese registry according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the PARTNER 3 trial was favorable and numerically comparable to those of SAVR patients in the PARTNER 3 trial.

摘要

两项随机对照试验表明,在低手术风险的重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者中,经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)相比,1-2 年的临床结局相当甚至更优。然而,以前没有研究报告过日本低手术风险患者接受 SAVR 后的临床结果。我们从 CURRENT AS 注册中心的 3815 例连续患者中,根据 PARTNER 3 试验的纳入和排除标准,检索到 220 例接受 SAVR 的患者。当前研究人群的年龄和手术风险评分与 PARTNER 3 试验相当(年龄:75 岁对 74 岁,STS-PROM 评分:2.3 对 1.9)。当前研究人群和 PARTNER 3 试验中 SAVR 患者的复合全因死亡或卒中的累积发生率在 30 天(2.3%对 3.3%)和 1 年(4.1%对 4.9%)时均相当。根据 PARTNER 3 试验的纳入和排除标准,从真实世界的日本注册中心中选择的低手术风险严重 AS 患者的 SAVR 临床结果良好,且在数值上与 PARTNER 3 试验中的 SAVR 患者相当。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk Japanese patients with severe aortic stenosis.日本低危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行主动脉瓣置换术后的临床转归。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan;36(1):121-130. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00658-2. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
2
Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者随机接受经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的两年结果:全人群北欧主动脉瓣干预随机临床试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003665.
3
Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.退伍军人事务医疗系统中接受经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗的中度风险患者的结局:单中心20年经验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):390-398. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27478. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
4
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis in Real-World Clinical Practice.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗真实世界临床实践中的重度主动脉瓣狭窄。
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):806-814. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0951. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
5
Outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: results from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial (cohort A).经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗高危主动脉瓣狭窄合并左心室功能不全患者的疗效:主动脉经导管瓣膜置入(PARTNER)试验(A队列)结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(6):604-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000650. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
6
Propensity score matched comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus conventional surgery in intermediate and low risk aortic stenosis patients: A hint of real-world.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与传统手术治疗中低危主动脉瓣狭窄患者的倾向性评分匹配比较:真实世界的提示。
Cardiol J. 2016;23(5):541-551. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0051. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
7
Effect of SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Valve Implantation on Health Status in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: Results From the PARTNER S3i Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术对中危外科手术风险严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者健康状况的影响:PARTNER S3i 试验结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun 25;11(12):1188-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.032. Epub 2018 May 30.
8
5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄高危患者的 5 年结果(PARTNER 1):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2477-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60308-7. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
9
Comparison of Survival of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Low-Risk Patients Without Coronary Artery Disease.比较无冠状动脉疾病的低危主动脉瓣狭窄患者经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的生存情况。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Feb 15;125(4):589-596. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
10
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Cardiac Surgery in the Randomized PARTNER 2A Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在随机 PARTNER 2A 试验中既往心脏手术患者中的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 12;11(21):2207-2216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
2
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
3
Learning Curve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Under a Controlled Introduction System - Initial Analysis of a Japanese Nationwide Registry.
经控量引入系统行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的学习曲线:日本全国注册研究的初步分析
Circ J. 2018 Jun 25;82(7):1951-1958. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0211. Epub 2018 May 22.
4
Aortic Stenosis: Then and Now.主动脉瓣狭窄:过去与现在
Circulation. 2018 May 15;137(20):2099-2100. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033408. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
5
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2017年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.
6
2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会对2014年《美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南》的重点更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 11;70(2):252-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科瓣膜置换术治疗中危患者的效果比较:倾向评分分析。
Lancet. 2016 May 28;387(10034):2218-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30073-3. Epub 2016 Apr 3.
8
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
9
Initial Surgical Versus Conservative Strategies in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的初始外科手术与保守治疗策略。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 29;66(25):2827-2838. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
10
5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄高危患者的 5 年结果(PARTNER 1):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2477-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60308-7. Epub 2015 Mar 15.