Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun 25;11(12):1188-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.032. Epub 2018 May 30.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the SAPIEN 3 valve (S3-TAVR) results in improved quality of life (QoL) compared with previous-generation TAVR devices or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
In patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, TAVR using the SAPIEN XT valve (XT-TAVR) results in similar QoL compared with SAVR. Compared with SAPIEN XT, the SAPIEN 3 valve offers a lower delivery profile and modifications to reduce paravalvular regurgitation.
Between February and December 2014, 1,078 patients at intermediate surgical risk with severe aortic stenosis were treated with S3-TAVR in the PARTNER S3i (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve) trial. QoL was assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 1 year using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, and EQ-5D. QoL outcomes of S3-TAVR patients were compared with those in the SAVR and XT-TAVR arms of the PARTNER 2A trial using propensity score stratification to adjust for differences between the treatment groups.
Over 1 year, S3-TAVR was associated with substantial improvements in QoL compared with baseline. At 1 month, S3-TAVR was associated with better QoL than either SAVR or XT-TAVR (adjusted differences in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score 15.6 and 3.7 points, respectively; p < 0.001). At 1 year, the differences in QoL between S3-TAVR and both SAVR and XT-TAVR were reduced but remained statistically significant (adjusted differences 2.0 and 2.2 points, respectively; p < 0.05). Similar results were seen for generic QoL outcomes.
Among patients at intermediate surgical risk with severe aortic stenosis, S3-TAVR resulted in improved QoL at both 1 month and 1 year compared with both XT-TAVR and SAVR.
本研究旨在评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中使用 SAPIEN 3 瓣膜(S3-TAVR)与上一代 TAVR 装置或外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)相比是否能改善生活质量(QoL)。
在中危外科手术风险的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,使用 SAPIEN XT 瓣膜(XT-TAVR)进行 TAVR 的 QoL 与 SAVR 相似。与 SAPIEN XT 相比,SAPIEN 3 瓣膜具有更低的输送轮廓和减少瓣周漏的改进。
在 2014 年 2 月至 12 月期间,1078 例中危外科手术风险伴严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者在 PARTNER S3i(经导管主动脉瓣置换)试验中接受了 S3-TAVR。使用堪萨斯城心肌病问卷、医疗结局研究 36 项简短形式和 EQ-5D 在基线、1 个月和 1 年评估 QoL。使用倾向评分分层法比较 S3-TAVR 患者与 PARTNER 2A 试验中 SAVR 和 XT-TAVR 组的 QoL 结果,以调整治疗组之间的差异。
与基线相比,S3-TAVR 在 1 年内与 QoL 的显著改善相关。在 1 个月时,S3-TAVR 的 QoL 优于 SAVR 或 XT-TAVR(校正后的堪萨斯城心肌病问卷整体综合评分差异分别为 15.6 和 3.7 分;p<0.001)。在 1 年时,S3-TAVR 与 SAVR 和 XT-TAVR 的 QoL 差异缩小,但仍具有统计学意义(校正差异分别为 2.0 和 2.2 分;p<0.05)。一般 QoL 结果也相似。
在中危外科手术风险伴严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者中,S3-TAVR 在 1 个月和 1 年时与 XT-TAVR 和 SAVR 相比均能改善 QoL。