MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Apr;32(4):547-560. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01515-1. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint condition and, with a burgeoning ageing population, is due to increase in prevalence. Beyond conventional medical and surgical interventions, there are an increasing number of 'alternative' therapies. These alternative therapies may have a limited evidence base and, for this reason, are often only afforded brief reference (or completely excluded) from current OA guidelines. Thus, the aim of this review was to synthesize the current evidence regarding autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), vitamin D and other alternative therapies. The majority of studies were in knee OA or chondral defects. Matrix-assisted ACI has demonstrated exceedingly limited, symptomatic improvements in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee and is not supported for the treatment of knee OA. There is some evidence to suggest symptomatic improvement with MSC injection in knee OA, with the suggestion of minimal structural improvement demonstrated on MRI and there are positive signals that PRP may also lead to symptomatic improvement, though variation in preparation makes inter-study comparison difficult. There is variability in findings with vitamin D supplementation in OA, and the only recommendation which can be made, at this time, is for replacement when vitamin D is deplete. Other alternative therapies reviewed have some evidence (though from small, poor-quality studies) to support improvement in symptoms and again there is often a wide variation in dosage and regimens. For all these therapeutic modalities, although controlled studies have been undertaken to evaluate effectiveness in OA, these have often been of small size, limited statistical power, uncertain blindness and using various methodologies. These deficiencies must leave the question as to whether they have been validated as effective therapies in OA (or chondral defects). The conclusions of this review are that all alternative interventions definitely require clinical trials with robust methodology, to assess their efficacy and safety in the treatment of OA beyond contextual and placebo effects.
骨关节炎(OA)是最常见的关节疾病,随着人口老龄化的迅速增长,其患病率也在不断上升。除了传统的医学和手术干预外,还有越来越多的“替代”疗法。这些替代疗法的证据基础可能有限,因此,它们通常只在当前 OA 指南中得到简短提及(或完全排除)。因此,本综述的目的是综合目前关于自体软骨细胞移植(ACI)、间充质干细胞(MSC)治疗、富含血小板的血浆(PRP)、维生素 D 和其他替代疗法的证据。大多数研究都针对膝关节 OA 或软骨缺损。基质辅助 ACI 在治疗膝关节软骨缺陷方面表现出非常有限的、症状性的改善,不支持用于治疗膝关节 OA。有一些证据表明 MSC 注射治疗膝关节 OA 可改善症状,MRI 显示结构改善最小,有迹象表明 PRP 也可能改善症状,但由于制备方法不同,使得研究间比较困难。维生素 D 补充治疗 OA 的结果存在差异,目前唯一可以建议的是,当维生素 D 缺乏时进行补充。其他替代疗法也有一些证据(尽管来自小型、低质量的研究)支持改善症状,而且剂量和方案也常常存在很大差异。对于所有这些治疗方法,尽管已经进行了对照研究来评估它们在 OA 中的有效性,但这些研究往往规模较小、统计效力有限、盲法不确定,并且使用了各种方法。这些缺陷使得这些治疗方法是否已经在 OA(或软骨缺损)中得到验证成为一个问题。本综述的结论是,所有替代干预措施肯定需要采用稳健的方法进行临床试验,以评估它们在治疗 OA 中的疗效和安全性,超越背景和安慰剂效应。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020-3-13
Health Technol Assess. 2017-2
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023-6
Int J Pharm X. 2025-8-10
Front Immunol. 2025-4-10
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-3-22
J Clin Med. 2025-3-16
Biomed Pharmacother. 2018-11-29
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2018-6-2