Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
JAMA. 2021 Nov 23;326(20):2021-2030. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.19415.
Most clinical guidelines do not recommend platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) because of lack of high-quality evidence on efficacy for symptoms and joint structure, but the guidelines emphasize the need for rigorous studies. Despite this, use of PRP in knee OA is increasing.
To evaluate the effects of intra-articular PRP injections on symptoms and joint structure in patients with symptomatic mild to moderate radiographic medial knee OA.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, 2-group, placebo-controlled, participant-, injector-, and assessor-blinded clinical trial enrolled community-based participants (n = 288) aged 50 years or older with symptomatic medial knee OA (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or 3) in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia, from August 24, 2017, to July 5, 2019. The 12-month follow-up was completed on July 22, 2020.
Interventions involved 3 intra-articular injections at weekly intervals of either leukocyte-poor PRP using a commercially available product (n = 144 participants) or saline placebo (n = 144 participants).
The 2 primary outcomes were 12-month change in overall average knee pain scores (11-point scale; range, 0-10, with higher scores indicating worse pain; minimum clinically important difference of 1.8) and percentage change in medial tibial cartilage volume as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty-one secondary outcomes (25 symptom related and 6 MRI assessed; minimum clinically important difference not known) evaluated pain, function, quality of life, global change, and joint structures at 2-month and/or 12-month follow-up.
Among 288 patients who were randomized (mean age, 61.9 [SD, 6.5] years; 169 [59%] women), 269 (93%) completed the trial. In both groups, 140 participants (97%) received all 3 injections. After 12 months, treatment with PRP vs placebo injection resulted in a mean change in knee pain scores of -2.1 vs -1.8 points, respectively (difference, -0.4 [95% CI, -0.9 to 0.2] points; P = .17). The mean change in medial tibial cartilage volume was -1.4% vs -1.2%, respectively (difference, -0.2% [95% CI, -1.9% to 1.5%]; P = .81). Of 31 prespecified secondary outcomes, 29 showed no significant between-group differences.
Among patients with symptomatic mild to moderate radiographic knee OA, intra-articular injection of PRP, compared with injection of saline placebo, did not result in a significant difference in symptoms or joint structure at 12 months. These findings do not support use of PRP for the management of knee OA.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12617000853347.
重要性:由于缺乏针对症状和关节结构的疗效的高质量证据,大多数临床指南不推荐使用富含血小板的血浆(PRP)治疗膝骨关节炎(OA),但指南强调需要进行严格的研究。尽管如此,PRP 在膝 OA 中的应用仍在增加。
目的:评估关节内 PRP 注射对有症状的轻至中度放射学内侧膝 OA 患者的症状和关节结构的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项随机、2 组、安慰剂对照、参与者、注射者和评估者双盲的临床试验,招募了来自澳大利亚悉尼和墨尔本的社区参与者(n=288),年龄在 50 岁及以上,有症状的内侧膝 OA(Kellgren 和 Lawrence 分级 2 或 3)。12 个月的随访于 2020 年 7 月 22 日完成。
干预措施:干预措施包括每周一次进行 3 次关节内注射,分别使用商业上可用的白细胞减少的 PRP(n=144 名参与者)或生理盐水安慰剂(n=144 名参与者)。
主要结局和测量:两个主要结局是 12 个月时总体平均膝关节疼痛评分的变化(11 分制;范围为 0-10,得分越高表示疼痛越严重;最小临床重要差异为 1.8)和磁共振成像(MRI)评估的内侧胫骨软骨体积的百分比变化。31 个次要结局(25 个与症状相关,6 个与 MRI 评估相关;最小临床重要差异未知)评估了疼痛、功能、生活质量、整体变化和关节结构在 2 个月和/或 12 个月随访时的情况。
结果:在 288 名随机分组的患者中(平均年龄 61.9[标准差 6.5]岁;169[59%]名女性),有 269 名(93%)完成了试验。在两组中,各有 140 名参与者(97%)接受了所有 3 次注射。在 12 个月时,PRP 治疗组与安慰剂注射组的膝关节疼痛评分分别平均变化-2.1 分和-1.8 分(差值-0.4[95%置信区间 -0.9 至 0.2];P=0.17)。内侧胫骨软骨体积的平均变化分别为-1.4%和-1.2%(差值-0.2%[95%置信区间-1.9%至 1.5%];P=0.81)。在 31 个预先指定的次要结局中,有 29 个没有显示出组间的显著差异。
结论和相关性:在有症状的轻至中度放射学膝骨关节炎患者中,与注射生理盐水安慰剂相比,关节内注射 PRP 在 12 个月时对症状或关节结构没有显著影响。这些发现不支持使用 PRP 来治疗膝骨关节炎。
试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心标识符:ACTRN12617000853347。