Faculty of Psychology, Instituto de Neurociencias del Principado de Asturias (INEUROPA), Oviedo, Spain.
Faculty of Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Brain Behav. 2020 May;10(5):e01532. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1532. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
Spatial orientation relies mainly on two frameworks. The egocentric depends on our own position and point of view. The allocentric relies on remembering, recalling, and recognizing environmental stimuli called landmarks. The aim of this study was to analyze the egocentric and allocentric spatial memory performance in children of different ages using two experimental memory card-placing tasks. We also aimed to examine relationships between spatial memory and other cognitive, physiological, and behavioral factors that, potentially, could be associated with spatial memory performance. Those were other visuospatial functions, the regular behavior of the child, cortisol levels, and daily life spatial memory.
We assessed 62 children (5, 6, and 7 years) using card-placing tasks. We used RIST for IQ evaluation and subtest from NEPSY-II for visuospatial ability assessment. Collection of saliva sample was carried out for cortisol analysis. Parents completed BASC questionnaire for behavioral evaluation and ECM-Q questionnaire for daily life spatial memory evaluation.
Our results showed that older children performed better on mental rotation. Directionality, map interpretation, and daily memory were directly associated with both egocentric and allocentric orientation. Egocentric performance was positively related to leadership abilities but negatively to depression and atypicality, while allocentric performance was directly associated with adaptive behavior but inversely with hyperactivity. Finally, cortisol values were positively associated with allocentric performance.
Our study shows the development of different spatial abilities between 5 and 7 years, as well as the relationship between orientation performance, visuospatial skills, behavior, and cortisol.
空间定向主要依赖于两个框架。以自我为中心依赖于我们自己的位置和视角。以客体为中心则依赖于记忆、回忆和识别环境刺激,这些刺激被称为地标。本研究的目的是使用两种实验性记忆卡片放置任务,分析不同年龄儿童的自我中心和客体中心空间记忆表现。我们还旨在研究空间记忆与其他认知、生理和行为因素之间的关系,这些因素可能与空间记忆表现有关。这些因素包括其他视空间功能、儿童的常规行为、皮质醇水平和日常生活中的空间记忆。
我们使用卡片放置任务评估了 62 名儿童(5、6 和 7 岁)。我们使用 RIST 进行智商评估,使用 NEPSY-II 的子测试进行视空间能力评估。收集唾液样本进行皮质醇分析。家长完成 BASC 问卷进行行为评估,完成 ECM-Q 问卷进行日常生活空间记忆评估。
我们的结果表明,年龄较大的儿童在心理旋转方面表现更好。方向感、地图解读和日常生活记忆与自我中心和客体中心定向直接相关。自我中心表现与领导能力呈正相关,但与抑郁和非典型性呈负相关,而客体中心表现与适应行为呈正相关,但与多动呈负相关。最后,皮质醇值与客体中心表现呈正相关。
我们的研究表明,5 至 7 岁之间不同空间能力的发展,以及定向表现、视空间技能、行为和皮质醇之间的关系。