Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;27(8):2732-2739. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08334-8. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can accurately identify poor responders after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) who will need to go straight to surgery, and to evaluate whether results are reproducible among radiologists with different levels of expertise.
Seven independent readers with different levels of expertise retrospectively evaluated the restaging MRIs (T2-weighted + diffusion-weighted imaging [T2W + DWI]) of 62 patients and categorized them as (1) poor responders - highly suspicious of tumor; (2) intermediate responders - tumor most likely; and (3) good - potential (near) complete responders. The reference standard was histopathology after surgery (or long-term follow-up in the case of a watch-and-wait program).
Fourteen patients were complete responders and 48 had residual tumor. The median percentage of patients categorized by the seven readers as 'poor', 'intermediate', and 'good' responders was 21% (range 11-37%), 50% (range 23-58%), and 29% (range 23-42%), respectively. The vast majority of poor responders had histopathologically confirmed residual tumor (73% ypT3-4), with a low rate (0-5%) of 'missed complete responders'. Of the 14 confirmed complete responders, a median percentage of 71% were categorized in the MR-good response group and 29% were categorized in the MR-intermediate response group.
Radiologists of varying experience levels should be able to use MRI to identify the ± 20% subgroup of poor responders who will definitely require surgical resection after CRT. This may facilitate more selective use of endoscopy, particularly in general settings or in centers with limited access to endoscopy.
本研究旨在评估磁共振成像(MRI)是否能准确识别出需要直接手术的化放疗(CRT)后预后不良的患者,并评估不同专业水平的放射科医生的结果是否具有可重复性。
7 名具有不同专业水平的独立读者回顾性评估了 62 例患者的再分期 MRI(T2 加权+弥散加权成像[T2W+DWI]),并将其分类为(1)预后不良-高度怀疑肿瘤;(2)中等反应-最有可能为肿瘤;和(3)良好-潜在(接近)完全缓解者。参考标准是手术后的组织病理学(或等待观察方案的长期随访)。
14 例患者为完全缓解者,48 例患者有残留肿瘤。7 名读者中,将患者分为“预后不良”、“中等”和“良好”反应者的中位数比例分别为 21%(范围 11-37%)、50%(范围 23-58%)和 29%(范围 23-42%)。绝大多数预后不良的患者有组织学证实的残留肿瘤(73%ypT3-4),“漏诊完全缓解者”的比例很低(0-5%)。在 14 例确诊的完全缓解者中,中位数 71%的患者被归类为 MRI 良好反应组,29%的患者被归类为 MRI 中等反应组。
不同经验水平的放射科医生应该能够使用 MRI 识别出 CRT 后肯定需要手术切除的那 20%左右的预后不良亚组。这可能有助于更有选择性地使用内镜,特别是在一般环境或内镜获取有限的中心。