• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的医疗支出与碳足迹:基于隐性协整方法的证据。

Healthcare expenditure and carbon footprint in the USA: evidence from hidden cointegration approach.

机构信息

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Econometrics, Usak University, Usak, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jul;21(5):801-811. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01174-z. Epub 2020 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-020-01174-z
PMID:32172391
Abstract

The priority aim of this study is to investigate the effect of carbon footprint, which is an indicator of environmental degradation, on health expenditures for the USA. In the study, cointegration analysis was performed for the period 1970-2016 by using health expenditures, carbon footprint, gross domestic product per capita and life expectancy at birth variables. According to the results of standard cointegration analysis, only cointegration relationship between health expenditures and income was found. In the models with carbon footprint, no cointegration relationship was discovered between the original values of the variables. This result was approached with suspicion, and it was thought that there might be a hidden cointegration between healthcare expenditures and carbon footprint. For this purpose, the hidden cointegration analysis and crouching error correction model proposed by Granger and Yoon [18] were employed among the positive and negative components of the variables of healthcare expenditures and carbon footprint. The results of the hidden cointegration analysis revealed that there was a hidden cointegration relationship between the positive components of healthcare expenditures and the positive components of carbon footprint. Analysis results show that a 1% increase in carbon footprint will cause a 2.04% increase in healthcare expenditures in the long term in the USA. When the positive components of the variables were considered, it was concluded that there was a one-way long-term asymmetric causality relationship between carbon footprint and healthcare expenditures. As a result of the study, it was proposed that the carbon footprint should be diminished to prevent the increasing burden of the healthcare expenditures on the budget.

摘要

本研究的首要目标是探究碳足迹(环境污染程度的指标)对美国健康支出的影响。本研究采用 1970 年至 2016 年的健康支出、碳足迹、人均国内生产总值和出生时预期寿命等变量,通过协整分析进行了研究。根据标准协整分析的结果,仅发现健康支出与收入之间存在协整关系。在包含碳足迹的模型中,未发现变量原始值之间存在协整关系。对这一结果产生了怀疑,认为健康支出和碳足迹之间可能存在隐性协整关系。为此,采用了 Granger 和 Yoon [18] 提出的隐性协整分析和潜伏误差修正模型,对健康支出和碳足迹变量的正负分量进行了分析。隐性协整分析的结果表明,健康支出的正分量与碳足迹的正分量之间存在隐性协整关系。分析结果表明,在美国,碳足迹每增加 1%,长期来看将导致医疗支出增加 2.04%。当考虑变量的正分量时,碳足迹和医疗支出之间存在单向长期非对称因果关系。因此,研究建议减少碳足迹,以防止医疗支出对预算造成的负担不断增加。

相似文献

1
Healthcare expenditure and carbon footprint in the USA: evidence from hidden cointegration approach.美国的医疗支出与碳足迹:基于隐性协整方法的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jul;21(5):801-811. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01174-z. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
2
Are Air Pollution, Economic and Non-Economic Factors Associated with Per Capita Health Expenditures? Evidence from Emerging Economies.空气污染、经济和非经济因素与人均医疗支出有关吗?来自新兴经济体的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 3;16(11):1967. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111967.
3
Health Care Expenditure and GDP in Oil Exporting Countries: Evidence From OPEC Data, 1995-2012.石油出口国的医疗保健支出与国内生产总值:基于石油输出国组织(OPEC)1995 - 2012年数据的证据
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Jun 11;8(2):93-8. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n2p93.
4
Health expenditure and gross domestic product: causality analysis by income level.卫生支出与国内生产总值:按收入水平进行的因果关系分析
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2020 Mar;20(1):55-77. doi: 10.1007/s10754-019-09270-1. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
Is technology still a major driver of health expenditure in the United States? Evidence from cointegration analysis with multiple structural breaks.技术仍是美国医疗支出的主要驱动因素吗?来自具有多个结构断点的协整分析的证据。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2017 Mar;17(1):29-50. doi: 10.1007/s10754-016-9196-2. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
6
Tests of stationarity and cointegration of health care expenditure and gross domestic product: an application to Turkey.医疗保健支出与国内生产总值的平稳性和协整性检验:土耳其的应用
Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Dec;7(4):285-9. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0375-9.
7
ANALYSIS OF TRENDS IN LIFE EXPECTANCIES AND PER CAPITA GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AS WELL AS PHARMACEUTICAL AND NON-PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTHCARE EXPENDITURES.人均预期寿命、人均国内生产总值以及医药和非医药医疗保健支出的趋势分析
Acta Pol Pharm. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):1045-50.
8
The Relative Effects of Economic Growth, Environmental Pollution and Non-Communicable Diseases on Health Expenditures in European Union Countries.欧盟国家经济增长、环境污染和非传染性疾病对医疗支出的相对影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 14;16(24):5115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245115.
9
Consequences of Information and Communication Technologies and Environmental Degradation on Health Expenditure.信息通信技术和环境恶化对医疗支出的影响。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241277449. doi: 10.1177/00469580241277449.
10
The influence of renewable energy use, human capital, and trade on environmental quality in South Africa: multiple structural breaks cointegration approach.可再生能源利用、人力资本和贸易对南非环境质量的影响:多结构断裂协整方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(11):13162-13174. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11370-2. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Health Expenditure, CO Emissions, and Economic Growth in G7: Evidence from Heterogeneous Panel Data.七国集团中卫生支出、一氧化碳排放与经济增长之间的关系:来自异质性面板数据的证据
J Knowl Econ. 2023 Apr 4:1-26. doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01349-y.
2
Spatio-temporal variations in carbon sources, sinks and footprints of cropland ecosystems in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Plain of China, 2013-2022.2013—2022年中国长江中下游平原农田生态系统碳源、碳汇及碳足迹的时空变化
Sci Rep. 2025 May 9;15(1):16225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98457-3.
3
The climate emergency for rheumatologists: where do we stand?

本文引用的文献

1
On the nexus of air pollution and health expenditures: new empirical evidence.论空气污染与医疗支出的关系:新的实证证据。
Gac Sanit. 2019 Jul-Aug;33(4):389-394. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 May 22.
2
Determinants of health care costs in the senior elderly: age, comorbidity, impairment, or proximity to death?老年人医疗保健费用的决定因素:年龄、合并症、功能障碍还是接近死亡?
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;19(6):831-842. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0926-2. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
The dynamic links between carbon dioxide (CO) emissions, health spending and GDP growth: A case study for 51 countries.
风湿病学家面临的气候紧急情况:我们处于什么立场?
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Feb;44(2):573-582. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07284-w. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
4
Consequences of Information and Communication Technologies and Environmental Degradation on Health Expenditure.信息通信技术和环境恶化对医疗支出的影响。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241277449. doi: 10.1177/00469580241277449.
5
The nexus among CO emission, health expenditure and economic development in the OECD countries: New insights from a cross-sectional ARDL model.经合组织国家 CO 排放、卫生支出与经济发展的关系:来自横截面 ARDL 模型的新见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(11):16746-16769. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32081-y. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
Global evidence of environmental and lifestyle effects on medical expenditures across 154 countries.154个国家环境与生活方式对医疗支出影响的全球证据。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Oct 28;30:102036. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102036. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Health expenditures, environmental quality, and economic development: State-of-the-art review and findings in the context of COP26.卫生支出、环境质量与经济发展:基于《联合国气候变化框架公约》第二十六次缔约方会议的最新研究进展与发现
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;10:954080. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.954080. eCollection 2022.
8
Do renewable energy and health expenditures improve load capacity factor in the USA and Japan? A new approach to environmental issues.可再生能源和卫生支出是否能提高美国和日本的负荷能力系数?一种新的环境问题解决方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Dec;22(9):1427-1439. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01321-0. Epub 2021 May 21.
二氧化碳(CO)排放、卫生支出与国内生产总值增长之间的动态联系:51个国家的案例研究
Environ Res. 2017 Oct;158:137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.041. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
4
How relevant is environmental quality to per capita health expenditures? Empirical evidence from panel of developing countries.环境质量与人均卫生支出有多大关联?来自发展中国家面板数据的实证证据。
Springerplus. 2016 Jun 29;5(1):925. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2505-x. eCollection 2016.
5
Environmental effects on public health: an economic perspective.环境对公众健康的影响:经济视角
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Aug;6(8):2160-78. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6082160. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
6
The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries.碳足迹估算边界的重要性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Aug 15;42(16):5839-42. doi: 10.1021/es703112w.
7
Time to give due weight to the 'carbon footprint' issue.是时候给予“碳足迹”问题应有的重视了。
Nature. 2007 Jan 18;445(7125):256. doi: 10.1038/445256b.
8
The determinants of the public-private mix in Canadian health care expenditures: 1975-1996.1975 - 1996年加拿大医疗保健支出中公私混合的决定因素
Health Policy. 2000 Jun;52(2):87-112. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00071-3.
9
Health care spending as determinants of health outcomes.医疗保健支出作为健康结果的决定因素。
Health Econ. 1999 Nov;8(7):627-39. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199911)8:7<627::aid-hec474>3.0.co;2-8.
10
Health, environment and sustainable development: identifying links and indicators to promote action.健康、环境与可持续发展:确定促进行动的联系与指标。
Epidemiology. 1999 Sep;10(5):656-60.