University at Buffalo School of Social Work, 685 Baldy Hall, Buffalo, NY.
Department of Social Work, Binghamton University, PO Box 6000, Binghamton, NY.
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Dec;18(6):691-698. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520000176.
Goal concordant or congruent care involves having expressed wishes upheld. Yet, the preferred location for end-of-life care may be unaddressed. Caregiver-patient congruence between preferred and actual locations of care may influence the quality of life in bereavement. The study aimed to explore how the congruence between caregiver-patient preferred and actual locations of death influenced well-being in bereavement.
Mixed methods were employed. In-depth in-person interviews were conducted with 108 bereaved caregivers of a hospice patient about 4 months after the death. An interview guide was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data: demographics, decision-making, Core Bereavement Items (CBI), Health Related Quality of Life, and perspectives on the end-of-life experiences. Data were analyzed with a convergent mixed methods one-phase process.
Patient preference-actual location congruence occurred for 53%; caregiver preference-actual location congruence occurred for 74%; caregiver-patient preference and location of death occurred for 48%. Participants who reported some type of incongruence demonstrated higher levels of distress, including more days of being physically and emotionally unwell and more intense bereavement symptoms. The Acute Separation subscale and CBI total scores demonstrated significant differences for participants who experienced incongruence compared with those who did not. Preference location congruence themes emerged: (1) caregiver-patient location congruence, (2) caregiver-patient location incongruence, and (3) location informed bereavement.
Congruence between a dying person's preferred and actual locations at death has been considered good care. There has been little focus on the reciprocity between caregiver-patient wishes. Discussing preferences about the place of end-stage care may not make location congruence possible, but it can foster shared understanding and support for caregivers' sense of coherence and well-being in bereavement.
目标一致或一致的护理涉及到表达的意愿得到支持。然而,临终关怀的首选地点可能尚未确定。护理人员与患者在护理地点上的偏好与实际情况之间的一致性可能会影响丧亲后的生活质量。本研究旨在探讨护理人员与患者对死亡地点的偏好与实际情况之间的一致性如何影响丧亲后的幸福感。
采用混合方法。在临终关怀患者去世后约 4 个月,对 108 名丧亲护理人员进行了深入的个人访谈。使用访谈指南收集定量和定性数据:人口统计学、决策、核心丧亲项目(CBI)、健康相关生活质量以及对临终体验的看法。采用收敛混合方法一阶段过程进行数据分析。
患者偏好与实际位置一致的比例为 53%;护理人员偏好与实际位置一致的比例为 74%;护理人员与患者偏好与死亡地点一致的比例为 48%。报告存在某种程度不一致的参与者表现出更高水平的痛苦,包括身体和情绪不适的天数更多,丧亲症状更强烈。与没有经历不一致的参与者相比,急性分离子量表和 CBI 总分存在显著差异。出现了以下偏好位置一致性主题:(1)护理人员与患者位置一致,(2)护理人员与患者位置不一致,以及(3)位置影响丧亲。
临终时患者偏好与实际位置的一致性被认为是良好的护理。很少关注护理人员与患者愿望之间的相互性。讨论关于终末期护理地点的偏好可能无法使位置一致成为可能,但它可以促进共同理解,并为护理人员的连贯性和丧亲后的幸福感提供支持。