Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 May;69(5):1221-1230. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17055. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: As home becomes the most common place of death in the United States, information about caregiver support and place of death is critical to improve patient and caregiver experiences at end of life. We seek to examine (1) the association between family care availability and place of death; and (2) caregiving intensity associated with place of death.
2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving; nationally representative cross-sectional study of deceased older adults and last-month-of-life (LML) caregivers.
United States; all places of deaths.
Three-hundred and seventy-five decedents and 267 LML caregivers.
Place of death (home, hospital, and nursing or hospice facility), family care availability (spouse/partner, household size, number of daughters and sons), caregiving intensity (hours of help provided at LML and a binary indicator for high care-related emotional difficulty).
38.9% of older adults died at home, followed by hospital (33.1%), and nursing or hospice facility (28.0%). In an adjusted multinomial logistic regression, decedents with larger household size (odds ratio [OR]: 0.441; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.269-0.724) and more daughters (OR: 0.743 [95% CI: 0.575-0.958]) had lower odds of dying in nursing or hospice facility relative to dying at home. For older adults who died at home, caregivers provided 209.8 h of help at LML. In contrast, when death occurred in nursing or hospice facility, caregivers provided 91.6 fewer hours of help, adjusted for decedent and caregiver characteristics. Dying in hospital was associated with higher odds of caregiver emotional difficulty relative to home deaths (OR: 4.093 [95% CI: 1.623-10.323]).
Household size and number of daughters are important determinants of place of death. Despite dying at home being associated with more hours of direct caregiving; caregiver emotional strain was experienced as higher for hospital deaths. Better support services for end-of-life caregivers might improve patient and caregiver experiences for home and hospital deaths.
背景/目的:随着家成为美国最常见的死亡地点,有关护理人员支持和死亡地点的信息对于改善患者和护理人员在生命末期的体验至关重要。我们旨在研究:(1)家庭护理可用性与死亡地点之间的关系;(2)与死亡地点相关的护理强度。
2017 年国家健康与老龄化趋势研究和国家护理研究;对已故老年人和最后一个月护理人员进行的全国性横断面研究。
美国;所有死亡地点。
375 名死者和 267 名最后一个月的护理人员。
死亡地点(家、医院、护理或临终关怀机构)、家庭护理可用性(配偶/伴侣、家庭规模、女儿和儿子的数量)、护理强度(临终时提供的帮助小时数和高护理相关情感困难的二进制指标)。
38.9%的老年人在家中去世,其次是在医院(33.1%)和护理或临终关怀机构(28.0%)。在调整后的多项逻辑回归中,家庭规模较大的死者(优势比[OR]:0.441;95%置信区间[CI]:0.269-0.724)和女儿较多的死者(OR:0.743 [95% CI:0.575-0.958])在护理或临终关怀机构去世的可能性低于在家中去世的可能性。对于在家中去世的老年人,护理人员在最后一个月提供了 209.8 小时的帮助。相比之下,当死亡发生在护理或临终关怀机构时,护理人员提供的帮助减少了 91.6 小时,这是根据死者和护理人员的特征进行调整后的结果。与在家中死亡相比,在医院死亡与护理人员情感困难的几率更高相关(OR:4.093 [95% CI:1.623-10.323])。
家庭规模和女儿数量是死亡地点的重要决定因素。尽管在家中死亡与更多直接护理相关,但医院死亡的护理人员情感压力更大。为临终关怀护理人员提供更好的支持服务可能会改善在家中和医院死亡的患者和护理人员的体验。