• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

少数族裔参与妇科肿瘤学 1 期临床试验:三十年来的不公平现象。

Minority participation in phase 1 gynecologic oncology clinical trials: Three decades of inequity.

机构信息

Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36604, USA.

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jun;157(3):729-732. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.002
PMID:32173047
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

It is important to develop effective therapies in minorities to ensure equity in cancer care. Underrepresentation of minorities in early phase trials may cause therapies that are effective only in majority populations. We evaluated minority participation in gynecologic oncology phase 1 clinical trials.

METHODS

In peer-reviewed published articles of gynecologic oncology phase 1 clinical trials from years 1985 to 2018, we manually abstracted racial distribution of enrolled participants, cancer type, and year published. We calculated expected and observed ratios of racial participation on the basis of age-adjusted cancer incidence for race from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

RESULTS

We identified 357 articles of phase 1 trials (total, 9492 participants), including 213 articles on ovarian cancer (60%). Racial distribution of participants was available in 84 articles (23%) that included 2483 participants (26%): 1950 white (79%), 140 black (5%), and 393 other participants (16%). Other nonwhite races exceeded black enrollment in 46 of 84 trials (55%) that listed race. Enrollment of black participants was less than expected from disease incidence for ovarian (incidence-to-enrollment ratio, 18.5; P < .001), endometrial (3.6; P < .001), and cervical cancer (6.8; P < .001). No phase 1 study met expected enrollment for black participants. Frequency of black participants decreased 1.8-fold from 1995 to 1999 (8 of 70 participants [11%]) to 2015-2018 (55 of 892 participants [6%]; P < .025).

CONCLUSIONS

Major racial underrepresentation exists in gynecologic oncology phase 1 clinical trials. Enrollment of more black participants is needed to achieve racial equity.

摘要

目的

为确保癌症治疗的公平性,在少数族裔中开发有效的治疗方法非常重要。少数族裔在早期临床试验中的代表性不足可能导致仅对多数人群有效的治疗方法。我们评估了少数族裔在妇科肿瘤学 1 期临床试验中的参与情况。

方法

在 1985 年至 2018 年发表的妇科肿瘤学 1 期临床试验同行评审文章中,我们手动提取了入组参与者的种族分布、癌症类型和发表年份。我们根据美国疾病控制与预防中心的年龄调整后种族癌症发病率,计算了基于种族的预期和观察到的参与率。

结果

我们确定了 357 篇 1 期试验文章(共 9492 名参与者),其中包括 213 篇卵巢癌(60%)的文章。在 84 篇(23%)包括 2483 名参与者(26%)的文章中,可获得参与者的种族分布:1950 名白人(79%)、140 名黑人(5%)和 393 名其他参与者(16%)。在列出种族的 84 项试验中,有 46 项试验中其他非白色种族的入组人数超过了黑人(发病率与入组人数比,18.5;P<.001)。黑人参与者的入组人数低于卵巢癌(发病-入组比,18.5;P<.001)、子宫内膜癌(3.6;P<.001)和宫颈癌(6.8;P<.001)的发病率。没有 1 期研究符合黑人参与者的预期入组人数。黑人参与者的比例从 1995 年至 1999 年(8 名参与者中的 11%)下降到 2015 年至 2018 年(892 名参与者中的 55%),下降了 1.8 倍(P<.025)。

结论

妇科肿瘤学 1 期临床试验中存在严重的种族代表性不足。需要招募更多的黑人参与者,以实现种族公平。

相似文献

1
Minority participation in phase 1 gynecologic oncology clinical trials: Three decades of inequity.少数族裔参与妇科肿瘤学 1 期临床试验:三十年来的不公平现象。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jun;157(3):729-732. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
2
Minority participation in Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Studies.少数族裔参与妇科肿瘤学组(GOG)研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Aug;138(2):441-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 May 23.
3
Underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority groups in gynecologic oncology: An analysis of over 250 trials.少数族裔在妇科肿瘤学中代表性不足:对超过 250 项试验的分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Feb;181:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.12.001. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
4
Enrollment of Individuals From Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups in Gynecologic Cancer Precision Oncology Trials.少数族裔个体参与妇科癌症精准肿瘤学试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct 1;140(4):654-661. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004917. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
5
Not immune to inequity: minority under-representation in immunotherapy trials for breast and gynecologic cancers.不免受到不公待遇:少数族裔在乳腺癌和妇科癌症免疫疗法试验中的代表性不足。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Nov;31(11):1403-1407. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002557. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
6
Demographic reporting and language exclusion in gynecologic oncology clinical trials.妇科肿瘤临床试验中的人口统计学报告和语言排除。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan;230(1):73.e1-73.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.019. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities Among Participants in Precision Oncology Clinical Studies.精准肿瘤学临床研究中参与者的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133205. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33205.
8
Diversity and transparency in gynecologic oncology clinical trials.妇科肿瘤学临床试验中的多样性与透明度
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Feb;34(2):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01646-y. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
9
Participation of Patients With Limited English Proficiency in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trials.医学学术文献:《低英语水平患者参与妇科肿瘤临床试验》
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Jan;21(1):27-32.e2. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7068.
10
Minority Enrollment to Clinical Trials: Road to Increased Access.少数民族参与临床试验:增加可及性的途径。
Oncology (Williston Park). 2021 Mar 15;35(3):107. doi: 10.46883/ONC.2021.3503.0107.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of social, economic, and medical marginalization in cancer clinical trial participation inequities: A systematic review.社会、经济和医疗边缘化在癌症临床试验参与不平等中的作用:一项系统综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec 20;9(1):e25. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.677. eCollection 2025.
2
Integrating Machine Learning-Based Approaches into the Design of ASO Therapies.将基于机器学习的方法整合到反义寡核苷酸疗法的设计中。
Genes (Basel). 2025 Feb 2;16(2):185. doi: 10.3390/genes16020185.
3
Determinants of first-line clinical trial enrollment among Black and White gynecologic cancer patients.
黑人和白人妇科癌症患者一线临床试验入组的决定因素。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Jun;36(6):625-632. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-01963-y. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
4
Reducing health disparities in endometrial cancer care in 2024.2024 年减少子宫内膜癌护理中的健康差异。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Feb 1;36(1):18-22. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000924. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
5
Ethical challenges and opportunities in the development and approval of novel therapeutics for rare diseases.罕见病新型疗法研发与审批中的伦理挑战与机遇。
J Med Access. 2023 Jun 6;7:27550834231177507. doi: 10.1177/27550834231177507. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
Factors Associated With Survival Disparities Between Non-Hispanic Black and White Patients With Uterine Cancer.与非裔美国人和白人女性子宫癌患者生存差异相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238437. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8437.
7
Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Recurrent Microsatellite-Stable Endometrial Cancer in Early-Phase Immunotherapy Clinical Trials.早期免疫治疗临床试验中复发性微卫星稳定型子宫内膜癌患者的临床结局
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 29;14(15):3695. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153695.
8
Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences.希望与意义的探索:一项对肿瘤学 I 期临床试验中患者体验的定性研究的系统综述和主题综合分析。
Trials. 2022 May 16;23(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06306-9.
9
Disparities in cancer-specific and overall survival in black women with endometrial cancer: A Medicare-SEER study.黑人子宫内膜癌女性患者的癌症特异性生存率和总生存率差异:一项医疗保险-监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)研究
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jan 6;40:100922. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100922. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Dec 9;7(1):88. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00324-8.