Department of Radiology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Cracow, Poland.
Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Cracow, Poland.
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Mar 4;26:e920742. doi: 10.12659/MSM.920742.
BACKGROUND Due to the decreased sensitivity of mammography in glandular breasts, new diagnostic modalities, like contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare qualitative enhancement levels on CESM with type of kinetic enhancement curves on MRI examination. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients qualified for the CESM examination presented some diagnostic doubts - suspected multifocality, multicentricity, or having dense glandular breast tissue. The enhancement level on CESM was described as weak, medium, or strong. Enhancement on achieved MR images was assessed on the basis of enhancement kinetic curves. The level of enhancement on CESM was associated with enhancement curves type on MRI. All lesions detected on CESM and MRI were histopathologically verified. RESULTS The study involved 107 lesions diagnosed in 94 patients: 71 lesions (66%) appeared to be infiltrating on histopathological examination, 9 lesions (8%) were non-infiltrating cancers, and 27 lesions (25%) were benign. Data analysis revealed that lesions with wash-out curve on MRI most often presented strong enhancement on CESM, while in lesions with progressive enhancement curve, strong enhancement on CESM was the rarest. The relationship between enhancement level on CESM and curve type on contrast-enhanced MRI depends on the nature of the lesion. The type of MRI curve was found to be associated with enhancement level on CESM. CONCLUSIONS We compared subjective assessments of contrast enhancement on CESM with enhancement kinetic curves on MRI. The results showed that the level of enhancement on CESM and type of kinetic curves on MRI depends on the lesion type.
背景 由于乳腺腺体组织中的乳腺 X 线摄影敏感性降低,因此开发了新的诊断方式,如对比增强光谱乳腺摄影术(CESM)和数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)。本研究旨在比较 CESM 上的定性增强水平与 MRI 检查上的增强动力学曲线类型。
材料与方法 符合 CESM 检查条件的患者存在一些诊断疑虑 - 疑似多灶性、多中心性或乳腺组织致密。CESM 上的增强程度描述为弱、中或强。在获得的 MR 图像上评估增强程度是基于增强动力学曲线。CESM 上的增强程度与 MRI 上的增强曲线类型相关。在 CESM 和 MRI 上检测到的所有病变均经组织病理学证实。
结果 该研究共涉及 94 名患者的 107 个病变:71 个病变(66%)在组织病理学检查中表现为浸润性,9 个病变(8%)为非浸润性癌,27 个病变(25%)为良性。数据分析显示,在 MRI 上呈洗脱曲线的病变在 CESM 上通常表现为强增强,而在渐进性增强曲线的病变中,CESM 上的强增强最为罕见。CESM 上的增强程度与对比增强 MRI 上的曲线类型之间的关系取决于病变的性质。MRI 曲线的类型与 CESM 上的增强程度有关。
结论 我们比较了 CESM 上的对比增强的主观评估与 MRI 上的增强动力学曲线。结果表明,CESM 上的增强程度和 MRI 上的动力学曲线类型取决于病变类型。