College of Dental Medicine, Advanced Education in Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Roseman University of Health Sciences, 4 Sunset Way, Bldg C, Henderson, NV, 89014, USA.
Department of Oral Pathology, Medicine, and Radiology, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, USA.
Prog Orthod. 2020 Mar 16;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00308-6.
Correcting posterior crossbite in adult patients using nonsurgical methods may involve buccolingual tooth movement. Knowing the extent of the pretreatment alveolar bony dehiscences and fenestrations in the posterior area will aid orthodontists in planning posterior crossbite patients accordingly to minimize posttreatment bony defects. Before the advent of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), observing buccal and lingual bony defects was not possible unless other treatment needs allowed for an open-flap procedure. With CBCT technology, we can now detect posterior defects with some accuracy. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of posterior alveolar bony dehiscence and fenestration in adults with posterior crossbite compared with noncrossbite adults.
The study group consisted of pretreatment CBCTs of 28 samples with at least one or more teeth in posterior crossbite or edgebite. The comparison group consisted of pretreatment CBCTs of 28 samples with no posterior crossbite or edgebite. All buccal and lingual sides of the upper and lower posterior segments were measured for the presence of dehiscence, fenestration, and combined total bony defects.
The prevalence of total bony defects was higher in the study group (61.6%) than in the comparison group (52.1%) (p < 0.05). While there was no difference in prevalence between crossbite teeth in the study group and noncrossbite teeth in the comparison group, the noncrossbite teeth in the study group showed a higher prevalence of total bony defects, dehiscence, and fenestration than the noncrossbite teeth in the comparison group (p < 0.05). The prevalence of dehiscence was higher in the study group (41.2%) than in the comparison group (33.3%) (p < 0.05). Neither the prevalence of fenestration nor the mean bony defect size showed statistical significance between the two groups. First premolars showed a higher prevalence of dehiscence than other posterior teeth, and maxillary posterior teeth had a higher prevalence of fenestration than mandibular posterior teeth. Among the maxillary posterior teeth, second premolars had the least amount of fenestration.
Adult subjects with posterior crossbite had a higher prevalence of total bony defects and dehiscence, especially buccal dehiscence, in the posterior region than subjects with no posterior crossbite. This was due to the high prevalence observed in the noncrossbite teeth in posterior crossbite subjects.
使用非手术方法矫正成人后牙反牙合可能涉及颊舌向牙齿移动。了解后牙区治疗前牙槽骨开窗和骨裂的程度,有助于正畸医生根据后牙反牙合患者的情况进行相应的计划,以尽量减少治疗后骨缺损。在锥形束 CT(CBCT)出现之前,除非其他治疗需要进行开放式翻瓣术,否则无法观察颊舌侧骨缺损。有了 CBCT 技术,我们现在可以比较准确地发现后牙区的缺陷。本研究的目的是确定与无后牙反牙合的成人相比,患有后牙反牙合的成人中后牙牙槽骨开窗和骨裂的发生率。
研究组由 28 例至少有一颗或多颗牙齿后牙反牙合或边缘牙合的患者的预处理 CBCT 组成。对照组由 28 例无后牙反牙合或边缘牙合的患者的预处理 CBCT 组成。对上、下颌后牙的颊舌侧进行测量,以确定有无骨开窗、骨裂和联合总骨缺损。
研究组总骨缺损的发生率(61.6%)高于对照组(52.1%)(p<0.05)。研究组中反牙合牙与对照组中非反牙合牙的总骨缺损发生率无差异,但研究组中非反牙合牙的总骨缺损、骨开窗和骨裂发生率均高于对照组(p<0.05)。研究组骨开窗的发生率(41.2%)高于对照组(33.3%)(p<0.05)。两组间骨裂的发生率和平均骨缺损大小均无统计学意义。第一前磨牙的骨开窗发生率高于其他后牙,上颌后牙的骨开窗发生率高于下颌后牙。在上颌后牙中,第二前磨牙的骨裂发生率最低。
与无后牙反牙合的成人相比,后牙反牙合的成人后牙区总骨缺损和骨开窗的发生率(尤其是颊侧骨开窗)更高,这主要是由于后牙反牙合患者中非反牙合牙的高发生率所致。