Suppr超能文献

不锈钢冠用粘结水门汀的固位强度:一项系统评价。

Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review.

作者信息

Virupaxi Shruti, Pai Ramya, Mandroli Praveen

机构信息

Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Maratha Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;38(1):2-7. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_313_19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stainless steel crowns (SSCs) are unique coronal restorative materials used commonly in the management of primary teeth with extensive caries.

AIM

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the retentive strength of luting cements for SSCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two reviewers performed a database search of the studies published from 2004 till date. The inclusion criteria were papers published in the English language andin vitro studies on retentive strength of SSC on primary molars. All potentially relevant studies were identified by the title and the abstract. After the full-text analysis, the selected studies were included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

Sixteen nonduplicated studies were found. However, after reviewing the articles, only seven were included. Risk bias was assessed. Out of seven studies included in the systematic review, five studies presented medium risk of bias and two studies showed high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, thein vitro literature seems to suggest that the use of self-adhesive resin cements shows higher retentive strength, followed by resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) and conventional GIC. However, RM-GIC can be a preferred luting agent due to its clinical advantages over resin cements. Thus, it can be concluded that choice of cement will depend on individual patient needs and clinical situation.

摘要

背景

不锈钢全冠(SSCs)是一种独特的牙冠修复材料,常用于治疗患有广泛性龋齿的乳牙。

目的

本研究旨在进行系统评价,以评估用于不锈钢全冠的粘结水门汀的固位强度。

材料与方法

两名研究者对2004年至今发表的研究进行了数据库检索。纳入标准为以英文发表的论文以及关于不锈钢全冠在乳磨牙上固位强度的体外研究。所有潜在相关研究均通过标题和摘要进行识别。经过全文分析后,将选定的研究纳入系统评价。

结果

共发现16项非重复研究。然而,在审阅这些文章后,仅纳入了7项。对风险偏倚进行了评估。在纳入系统评价的7项研究中,5项研究存在中度偏倚风险,2项研究显示出高度偏倚风险。

结论

在本研究的局限性范围内,体外文献似乎表明,使用自粘结树脂水门汀显示出更高的固位强度,其次是树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RM-GIC)和传统玻璃离子水门汀。然而,由于RM-GIC相对于树脂水门汀具有临床优势,它可能是一种更优选的粘结剂。因此,可以得出结论,水门汀的选择将取决于个体患者的需求和临床情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验