Guyon Amélie J A A, Cannavò Rosamaria, Studer Regina K, Hildebrandt Horst, Danuser Brigitta, Vlemincx Elke, Gomez Patrick
Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
School of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 26;11:303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00303. eCollection 2020.
Music performance anxiety (MPA) is a major problem for music students. It is largely unknown whether music students who experience high or low anxiety differ in their respiratory responses to performance situations and whether these co-vary with self-reported anxiety, tension, and breathing symptoms. Affective processes influence dynamic respiratory regulation in ways that are reflected in measures of respiratory variability and sighing. This study had two goals. First, we determined how measures of respiratory variability, sighing, self-reported anxiety, tension, and breathing symptoms vary as a function of the performance situation (practice vs. public performance), performance phase (pre-performance vs. post-performance), and the general MPA level of music students. Second, we analyzed to what extent self-reported anxiety, tension, and breathing symptoms co-vary with the respiratory responses. The participants were 65 university music students. We assessed their anxiety, tension, and breathing symptoms with Likert scales and recorded their respiration with the LifeShirt system during a practice performance and a public performance. For the 10-min periods before and after each performance, we computed number of sighs, coefficients of variation (CVs, a measure of total variability), autocorrelations at one breath lag (ARs(1), a measure of non-random variability) and means of minute ventilation (V'), tidal volume (V), inspiration time (T), and expiration time (T). CVs and sighing were greater whereas AR(1) of V' was lower in the public session than in the practice session. The effect of the performance situation on CVs and sighing was larger for high-MPA than for low-MPA participants. Higher MPA levels were associated with lower CVs. At the within-individual level, anxiety, tension, and breathing symptoms were associated with deeper and slower breathing, greater CVs, lower AR(1) of V', and more sighing. We conclude that respiratory variability and sighing are sensitive to the performance situation and to musicians' general MPA level. Moreover, anxiety, tension, breathing symptoms, and respiratory responses co-vary significantly in the context of music performance situations. Respiratory monitoring can add an important dimension to the understanding of music performance situations and MPA and to the diagnostic and intervention outcome assessments of MPA.
音乐表演焦虑(MPA)是音乐专业学生面临的一个主要问题。目前尚不清楚高焦虑或低焦虑的音乐专业学生在对表演情境的呼吸反应上是否存在差异,以及这些反应是否与自我报告的焦虑、紧张和呼吸症状共同变化。情感过程以反映在呼吸变异性和叹气测量中的方式影响动态呼吸调节。本研究有两个目标。首先,我们确定了呼吸变异性、叹气、自我报告的焦虑、紧张和呼吸症状的测量值如何随表演情境(练习与公开表演)、表演阶段(表演前与表演后)以及音乐专业学生的一般MPA水平而变化。其次,我们分析了自我报告的焦虑、紧张和呼吸症状在多大程度上与呼吸反应共同变化。参与者为65名大学音乐专业学生。我们用李克特量表评估他们的焦虑、紧张和呼吸症状,并在练习表演和公开表演期间用LifeShirt系统记录他们的呼吸。在每次表演前后的10分钟时间段内,我们计算了叹气次数、变异系数(CVs,一种总变异性的测量指标)、一次呼吸滞后的自相关系数(ARs(1),一种非随机变异性的测量指标)以及分钟通气量(V')、潮气量(V)、吸气时间(T)和呼气时间(T)的平均值。公开表演时的CVs和叹气次数比练习表演时更多,而公开表演时V'的AR(1)比练习表演时更低。高MPA参与者中表演情境对CVs和叹气次数的影响比对低MPA参与者更大。较高的MPA水平与较低的CVs相关。在个体内部层面,焦虑、紧张和呼吸症状与更深、更慢的呼吸、更大的CVs、更低的V'的AR(1)以及更多的叹气相关。我们得出结论,呼吸变异性和叹气对表演情境和音乐家的一般MPA水平敏感。此外,在音乐表演情境中,焦虑、紧张、呼吸症状和呼吸反应显著共同变化。呼吸监测可以为理解音乐表演情境和MPA以及MPA的诊断和干预结果评估增加一个重要维度。