• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一年生植物中碳和磷的分配:一种优化功能的方法。

Carbon and Phosphorus Allocation in Annual Plants: An Optimal Functioning Approach.

作者信息

Kvakić Marko, Tzagkarakis George, Pellerin Sylvain, Ciais Philippe, Goll Daniel, Mollier Alain, Ringeval Bruno

机构信息

ISPA, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRAE, Villenave d'Ornon, France.

LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Universite Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2020 Feb 27;11:149. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00149. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2020.00149
PMID:32174939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7056904/
Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is the second most important nutrient after nitrogen (N) and can greatly diminish plant productivity if P supply is not adequate. Plants respond to soil P availability by adjusting root biomass to maintain uptake and productivity due to P use. In spite of our vast knowledge on P effects on plant growth, how to functionally model enhanced root biomass allocation in low P environments is not fully explored. We develop a dynamic plant model based on the principle of optimal carbon (C) and P allocation to investigate growth and functional response to contrasting levels of soil P availability. By describing plant growth as a balance of growth and respiration processes, we optimize C and P allocation in order to maximize leaf productivity and drive plant response. We compare our model to a field trial and a set of hydroponic experiments which describe plant response at varying P availabilities. The model is able to reproduce long-term plant functional response to different P levels like change in root-shoot ratio (RSR), total biomass and organ P concentration. But it is not capable of fully describing the time evolution of organ P uptake and cycling within the plant. Most notable is the underestimation of organ P uptake during the vegetative growth stage which is due to the model's leaf productivity formalism. In spite of the model's parsimonious nature, which optimizes for and predicts whole plant response through leaf productivity alone, the optimal growth hypothesis can provide a reasonable framework for modelling plant response to environmental change that can be used in more physically driven vegetation models.

摘要

磷(P)是仅次于氮(N)的第二重要养分,如果磷供应不足,会极大地降低植物生产力。植物通过调节根系生物量来响应土壤磷的有效性,以维持因磷利用而产生的吸收和生产力。尽管我们对磷对植物生长的影响有广泛的了解,但如何在功能上模拟低磷环境下根系生物量分配的增强尚未得到充分探索。我们基于最优碳(C)和磷分配原则开发了一个动态植物模型,以研究对不同土壤磷有效性水平的生长和功能响应。通过将植物生长描述为生长和呼吸过程的平衡,我们优化碳和磷的分配,以最大化叶片生产力并驱动植物响应。我们将我们的模型与一个田间试验和一组水培实验进行比较,这些实验描述了不同磷有效性下的植物响应。该模型能够重现植物对不同磷水平的长期功能响应,如根冠比(RSR)、总生物量和器官磷浓度的变化。但它无法完全描述植物体内器官磷吸收和循环的时间演变。最值得注意的是,由于模型的叶片生产力形式主义,在营养生长阶段对器官磷吸收的低估。尽管该模型具有简约性,仅通过叶片生产力进行优化和预测整个植物的响应,但最优生长假说可以为模拟植物对环境变化的响应提供一个合理的框架,可用于更基于物理驱动的植被模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/b69ccfe5ea09/fpls-11-00149-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/76a9de1ca961/fpls-11-00149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/7ec7961fc36b/fpls-11-00149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/74bd75a6e5dc/fpls-11-00149-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/f631c802ba08/fpls-11-00149-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/123cab85e844/fpls-11-00149-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/5bf72de60a1f/fpls-11-00149-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/b69ccfe5ea09/fpls-11-00149-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/76a9de1ca961/fpls-11-00149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/7ec7961fc36b/fpls-11-00149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/74bd75a6e5dc/fpls-11-00149-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/f631c802ba08/fpls-11-00149-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/123cab85e844/fpls-11-00149-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/5bf72de60a1f/fpls-11-00149-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff8/7056904/b69ccfe5ea09/fpls-11-00149-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Carbon and Phosphorus Allocation in Annual Plants: An Optimal Functioning Approach.一年生植物中碳和磷的分配:一种优化功能的方法。
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Feb 27;11:149. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00149. eCollection 2020.
2
Simulating the effects of water limitation on plant biomass using a 3D functional-structural plant model of shoot and root driven by soil hydraulics.利用基于土壤水力驱动的茎和根的三维功能结构植物模型模拟水分限制对植物生物量的影响。
Ann Bot. 2020 Sep 14;126(4):713-728. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa059.
3
Patterns of plant carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus concentration in relation to productivity in China's terrestrial ecosystems.中国陆地生态系统生产力与植物碳、氮、磷浓度的关系模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 17;115(16):4033-4038. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700295114.
4
Changes in plant phosphorus demand and supply relationships in response to different grazing intensities affect the soil organic carbon stock of a temperate steppe.植物磷需求与供应关系随不同放牧强度的变化会影响温带草原的土壤有机碳储量。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 10;876:163225. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163225. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
5
Scaling plant nitrogen use and uptake efficiencies in response to nutrient addition in peatlands.响应养分添加,提高泥炭地植物氮素利用和吸收效率。
Ecology. 2010 Mar;91(3):693-707. doi: 10.1890/09-0064.1.
6
Nitrogen addition and defoliation alter belowground carbon allocation with consequences for plant nitrogen uptake and soil organic carbon decomposition.氮添加和刈割改变了地下碳分配,从而影响植物氮吸收和土壤有机碳分解。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 10;846:157430. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157430. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
7
Mechanisms for the increase in phosphorus uptake of waterlogged plants: soil phosphorus availability, root morphology and uptake kinetics.淹水植物磷吸收增加的机制:土壤磷有效性、根系形态和吸收动力学。
Oecologia. 1997 Oct;112(2):150-155. doi: 10.1007/s004420050294.
8
Optimizing reproductive phenology in a two-resource world: a dynamic allocation model of plant growth predicts later reproduction in phosphorus-limited plants.在两资源世界中优化繁殖物候:植物生长的动态分配模型预测磷限制植物的后期繁殖。
Ann Bot. 2011 Aug;108(2):391-404. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr143. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
9
The effect of phosphorus availability on the carbon economy of contrasting common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes.磷有效性对不同普通菜豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)基因型碳经济的影响。
J Exp Bot. 2001 Feb;52(355):329-39.
10
N uptake and distribution in crops: an agronomical and ecophysiological perspective.作物中的氮素吸收与分配:农艺学与生态生理学视角
J Exp Bot. 2002 Apr;53(370):789-99. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.370.789.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Simulated Nitrogen Deposition on the Physiological and Growth Characteristics of Seedlings of Two Typical Subtropical Tree Species.模拟氮沉降对两种典型亚热带树种幼苗生理和生长特性的影响
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;14(14):2153. doi: 10.3390/plants14142153.
2
Contrasting biomass allocations explain adaptations to cold and drought in the world's highest-growing angiosperms.对比生物量分配可解释世界上生长最快的被子植物对寒冷和干旱的适应。
Ann Bot. 2024 Aug 22;134(3):401-414. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae028.
3
Genetics and metabolic responses of Artemisia annua L to the lake of phosphorus under the sparingly soluble phosphorus fertilizer: evidence from transcriptomics analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Why is plant-growth response to elevated CO amplified when water is limiting, but reduced when nitrogen is limiting? A growth-optimisation hypothesis.为什么在水分受限的情况下,植物生长对二氧化碳浓度升高的响应会增强,而在氮素受限的情况下却会减弱?一个生长优化假说。
Funct Plant Biol. 2008 Aug;35(6):521-534. doi: 10.1071/FP08128.
2
Phosphorus in agricultural soils: drivers of its distribution at the global scale.农业土壤中的磷:全球尺度下其分布的驱动因素。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Aug;23(8):3418-3432. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13618. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Scaling leaf respiration with nitrogen and phosphorus in tropical forests across two continents.
黄花蒿(Artemisia annua L)对低溶性磷肥条件下磷亏缺的遗传和代谢响应:转录组分析证据。
Funct Integr Genomics. 2024 Feb 8;24(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s10142-024-01301-6.
4
Sustainable Nutrition: Elevated root-zone phosphorus significantly increases leachate P and does not improve yield or quality.可持续营养:根区磷含量升高会显著增加渗滤液中的磷含量,且不会提高产量或品质。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Nov 17;13:1015652. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1015652. eCollection 2022.
5
A 3D image-based modelling approach for understanding spatiotemporal processes in phosphorus fertiliser dissolution, soil buffering and uptake by plant roots.基于 3D 图像的建模方法,用于理解磷肥料溶解、土壤缓冲和植物根系吸收过程中的时空变化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 23;12(1):15891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19047-1.
横跨两大洲的热带森林中叶片呼吸作用与氮和磷的关系
New Phytol. 2017 May;214(3):1064-1077. doi: 10.1111/nph.13992. Epub 2016 May 9.
4
Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites.碳去了哪里?两个温带森林自由空气二氧化碳富集站点植被碳分配与周转过程的模型-数据对比
New Phytol. 2014 Aug;203(3):883-99. doi: 10.1111/nph.12847. Epub 2014 May 21.
5
Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison.评估 21 世纪全球格网作物模型比较中的气候变化对农业的风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 4;111(9):3268-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222463110. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
6
Human-induced nitrogen-phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe.人为引起的氮磷失衡正在改变全球的自然和人工生态系统。
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2934. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3934.
7
Effects of phosphorus nutrition on photosynthesis in Glycine max (L.) Merr.磷营养对大豆(Glycine max (L.) Merr.)光合作用的影响。
Planta. 1990 Jun;181(3):399-405. doi: 10.1007/BF00195894.
8
Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review.对低磷供应的根系结构发育响应:综述。
Ann Bot. 2013 Jul;112(2):391-408. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs285. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
9
Modeling carbon allocation in trees: a search for principles.树木碳分配模拟:探寻原理。
Tree Physiol. 2012 Jun;32(6):648-66. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpr138. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
10
Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control.生物量在叶片、茎和根中的分配:种间变异和环境控制的荟萃分析。
New Phytol. 2012 Jan;193(1):30-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.