Li Waixing, Li Yueran, Zhao Xingping, Cheng Chunxia, Burjoo Arvind, Yang Yimin, Xu Dabao
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Feb;8(4):54. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.148.
Cervical insufficiency (CI) with concomitant intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) is a common clinical phenomenon among CI patients. But there are neither published reports regarding the difference in diagnosis and treatment of such patients compared to those with CI only, nor any report about their prognosis. This study aimed to preliminary the alteration in diagnostic and curative aspects of these patients, so as to provide a certain reference for the clinical management of such conditions.
Ten patients with CI combined with moderate to severe IUAs were diagnosed, treated and followed up at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from September 2017 to August 2019, their medical records and the pregnancy outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.
All 10 patients had a previous history of typical painless cervical dilatation during the second trimester. All patients were moderate to severer IUAs, and the mean AFS score of IUAs was 9.80±1.08 (range, 8 to 12). Preoperatively, in 6 patients, the No. 7 Hegar dilator was able to pass through the internal cervical os before surgery without resistance. In the other 4 patients, the Hegar dilator could not be inserted before surgery due to the adhesions of the cervical canal and the lower uterine segment; the diagnoses of these patients were further confirmed at 3 months after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA) when the No. 7 Hegar dilator was able to pass through the internal cervical os without resistance. There were 9 patients underwent pre-pregnancy laparoscopic cervical cerclage after HA. The remaining 1 patient exceptionally underwent laparoscopic cervical cerclage prior to HA, as the cervix was too loose to retain and be treated with an intrauterine device (IUD) or distended Foley's catheter balloon; which essentially prevent postoperative adhesion reformation. The patients were followed-up for 3 months to 2 years. The pregnancy rate was 60%, and the live birth rate was 100%.
In patients with CI and concomitant cervical or lower uterine segment IUAs, it is necessary to separate the adhesion prior to evaluating the cervical competency with the No. 7 Hegar dilator, to confirm the diagnosis. However, when the cervix is too loose, laparoscopic cervical cerclage is exceptionally carried out first and then IUAs is treated. Pre-pregnancy laparoscopic cervical cerclage has a good prognosis in patients with CI complicated by moderate to severe IUAs.
宫颈机能不全(CI)合并宫腔粘连(IUAs)是CI患者中常见的临床现象。但与单纯CI患者相比,关于此类患者诊断和治疗差异的报道较少,其预后情况也鲜见报道。本研究旨在初步探讨此类患者在诊断和治疗方面的变化,为临床处理此类情况提供一定参考。
选取2017年9月至2019年8月在中南大学湘雅三医院诊断、治疗及随访的10例CI合并中重度IUAs患者,对其病历资料及妊娠结局进行回顾性分析。
10例患者既往均有孕中期典型无痛性宫颈扩张史。所有患者均为中重度IUAs,IUAs平均美国生育学会(AFS)评分9.80±1.08(范围8~12分)。术前,6例患者7号海格扩张器能无阻力通过宫颈内口。另外4例患者因宫颈管及子宫下段粘连,术前无法插入海格扩张器;宫腔镜粘连松解术(HA)3个月后,7号海格扩张器能无阻力通过宫颈内口,进一步确诊。9例患者在HA后行孕前腹腔镜宫颈环扎术。其余1例患者因宫颈过于松弛无法放置宫内节育器(IUD)或 Foley 导尿管球囊而无法保留及治疗,故在HA前先行腹腔镜宫颈环扎术,以基本防止术后粘连复发。对患者随访3个月至2年。妊娠率为60%,活产率为100%。
对于CI合并宫颈或子宫下段IUAs患者,在使用7号海格扩张器评估宫颈机能之前,有必要先分离粘连以明确诊断。然而,当宫颈过于松弛时,可先例外进行腹腔镜宫颈环扎术,再治疗IUAs。孕前腹腔镜宫颈环扎术对CI合并中重度IUAs患者预后良好。