Gabes M, Chamlin S L, Lai J-S, Cella D, Mancini A J, Apfelbacher C J
InsStitute of Social Medicine and Health Economics, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Medical Sociology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Aug;34(8):1773-1778. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16362. Epub 2020 May 15.
The Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (CADIS) with 45 items may be burdensome to complete. We therefore aimed to develop a CADIS short-form.
Parents of 300 children completed the prototype CADIS. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the 45-item CADIS version. The most representative items were chosen. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the a priori factor structure. Content validity was assessed in a focus group of patients, parents, clinicians, methodologists and industry delegates. Internal consistency, 48-h test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the newly developed short-form were assessed.
A total of 270 families provided data at baseline, 34 after 48 h and 228 after 4 weeks. Fourteen items of three different factors fulfilled the proposed eligibility criteria and were included in the draft short-form. After the content validity rating, one item relating to the child's sleep was added to further improve content validity. The confirmatory factor analyses showed good model fit, and a 15-item short-form was initiated, the CADIS-SF15. The total scale and the three domains showed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The correlation between SCORAD and other subjective measures was consistent with our hypotheses. Differences in scores between mild, moderate and severe AD patients were significant, and the CADIS-SF15 was able to detect changes in 'improving' patients over time.
The CADIS-SF15 with 15 items in three domains is an internally consistent, reliable, valid, responsive and brief measure of QoL in children affected with AD and their parents. Further evaluation of clinical applicability is required.
包含45个条目的儿童特应性皮炎影响量表(CADIS)填写起来可能较为繁琐。因此,我们旨在开发一个CADIS简版。
300名儿童的家长完成了CADIS原型量表。对45个条目的CADIS版本进行探索性因素分析。选取最具代表性的条目。采用验证性因素分析来确认先验因素结构。在由患者、家长、临床医生、方法学家和行业代表组成的焦点小组中评估内容效度。对新开发的简版量表的内部一致性、48小时重测信度、结构效度和反应度进行评估。
共有270个家庭在基线时提供了数据,48小时后有34个家庭提供数据,4周后有228个家庭提供数据。三个不同因素的14个条目符合提议的入选标准,并被纳入简版量表草案。在进行内容效度评分后,增加了一个与儿童睡眠相关的条目以进一步提高内容效度。验证性因素分析显示模型拟合良好,由此启动了一个15个条目的简版量表,即CADIS-SF15。总量表及其三个领域均显示出良好的内部一致性和重测信度。SCORAD与其他主观测量指标之间的相关性与我们的假设一致。轻度、中度和重度特应性皮炎患者的得分差异显著,且CADIS-SF能够检测出“改善”患者随时间的变化。
包含三个领域15个条目的CADIS-SF15是一种内部一致、可靠、有效、有反应度且简短的工具,可用于评估特应性皮炎患儿及其家长的生活质量。还需要对其临床适用性进行进一步评估。