Silverberg J I, Margolis D J, Boguniewicz M, Fonacier L, Grayson M H, Ong P Y, Fuxench Z C, Simpson E L
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Jan;182(1):104-111. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18002. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
Structured patient-reported outcomes of atopic dermatitis (AD) severity are not standardized in clinical practice.
To determine the construct validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity and floor or ceiling effects of multiple AD severity assessments.
This is a cross-sectional, population-based study of 2893 adults, including 602 adults who met a modified set of U.K. diagnostic criteria for AD. AD severity was assessed using self-reported global AD severity, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD) and its objective and subjective components, and numerical rating scale (NRS)-itch. Quality of life was assessed using Short-Form (SF)-12 mental and physical health scores, Short-Form Six Dimensions (SF-6D) health utility scores and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Mental health was assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
PO-SCORAD, PO-SCORAD objective and subjective subscores, NRS-itch and POEM all had moderate-to-strong correlations with each other and DLQI, fair-to-moderate correlations with HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression, and inverse correlations with SF-12 mental component score and SF-6D (Pearson correlations, P < 0·001). All scores showed good criterion validity as judged by anova and receiver operator characteristics. PO-SCORAD, PO-SCORAD objective subscore and POEM had similarly good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0·84, 0·82 and 0·86); the PO-SCORAD subjective subscore was less internally consistent (alpha = 0·57). All scores showed potentially poor cross-cultural validity as demonstrated by uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning by age, sex and/or race/ethnicity for multiple items. There were floor effects for POEM, but not for the other assessments.
PO-SCORAD, PO-SCORAD objective and subjective subscores, NRS-itch and POEM appear to be valid for assessing AD severity in clinical practice. What's already known about this topic? Few studies have demonstrated the validity of the atopic dermatitis severity assessments Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD), PO-SCORAD subscores, numerical rating scale (NRS)-itch and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). What does this study add? This study demonstrates that PO-SCORAD, PO-SCORAD subscores, NRS-itch and POEM all had good construct validity in the assessment of atopic dermatitis severity in adults. Only POEM demonstrated floor effects. What are the clinical implications of this work? PO-SCORAD, PO-SCORAD subscores, NRS-itch and POEM all appear to have sufficient validity to be used as assessments of atopic dermatitis severity in clinical practice.
在临床实践中,特应性皮炎(AD)严重程度的结构化患者报告结局尚未标准化。
确定多种AD严重程度评估方法的结构效度、内部一致性、跨文化效度以及地板效应或天花板效应。
这是一项基于人群的横断面研究,纳入了2893名成年人,其中602名成年人符合一套修改后的英国AD诊断标准。使用自我报告的AD总体严重程度、患者导向性湿疹量表(POEM)、患者导向性特应性皮炎评分(PO-SCORAD)及其客观和主观成分,以及数字评定量表(NRS)-瘙痒来评估AD严重程度。使用简短健康调查(SF)-12心理健康和身体健康评分、简短健康调查六维度(SF-6D)健康效用评分以及皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)来评估生活质量。使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估心理健康。
PO-SCORAD、PO-SCORAD客观和主观子评分、NRS-瘙痒和POEM彼此之间以及与DLQI均具有中度至强相关性,与HADS-焦虑和HADS-抑郁具有中等至适度相关性,与SF-12心理成分评分和SF-6D呈负相关(Pearson相关性,P<0.001)。通过方差分析和受试者工作特征曲线判断,所有评分均显示出良好的效标效度。PO-SCORAD、PO-SCORAD客观子评分和POEM具有相似的良好内部一致性(Cronbach'sα=0.84、0.82和0.86);PO-SCORAD主观子评分的内部一致性较低(α=0.57)。多项条目在年龄、性别和/或种族/民族方面存在一致和不一致的差异项目功能,表明所有评分的跨文化效度可能较差。POEM存在地板效应,但其他评估不存在。
PO-SCORAD、PO-SCORAD客观和主观子评分、NRS-瘙痒和POEM在临床实践中似乎可有效评估AD严重程度。关于该主题已知的情况有哪些?很少有研究证明特应性皮炎严重程度评估方法患者导向性特应性皮炎评分(PO-SCORAD)、PO-SCORAD子评分、数字评定量表(NRS)-瘙痒和患者导向性湿疹量表(POEM)的有效性。本研究增加了什么内容?本研究表明,PO-SCORAD、PO-SCORAD子评分、NRS-瘙痒和POEM在评估成人特应性皮炎严重程度方面均具有良好的结构效度。只有POEM显示出地板效应。这项工作的临床意义是什么?PO-SCORAD、PO-SCORAD子评分、NRS-瘙痒和POEM似乎都具有足够的效度,可在临床实践中用作特应性皮炎严重程度的评估方法。