Breast Surgery, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035, Rome, 00189, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy.
Breast J. 2020 Jul;26(7):1265-1269. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13807. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
In 2017, the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual released the updating of TNM. The new edition introduces changes concerning tumor classification that could have a real innovative and useful clinical impact. The purpose of the study is to compare anatomic vs. prognostic stage group introduced in the new edition of AJCC staging system and its importance in clinical practice. We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic stage group introduced by the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system for breast cancer. We restaged a large series of patients with infiltrative breast cancer from 2004 to 2017 applying the AJCC 8th Edition prognostic stage group criteria. This study included 1575 patients with all molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Our follow-up included disease-free survival (DFS), disease-related survival (DRS), and overall survival (OS) data. Kaplan-Meier test was used for statistical analysis. The median follow-up was 7 years. The 5-year and 10-year OS were 96% and 90%, respectively. From our analysis, according to the 8th edition, the majority of patients included in the cohort had a down-staging to a better prognostic group except the triple-negative tumors. Most of the anatomic stage IIA turned into IA and IB. This new staging system seems to better relate to prognosis. Therefore, the prognostic stage represents an important support in breast cancer management since it could avoid unnecessary and ineffective therapies; in contrast, it could help realize the global evaluation of the risk of relapse/response to specific treatments, leading to a significant reduction in the national health cost.
2017 年,第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期手册发布了 TNM 的更新。新版本引入了与肿瘤分类有关的变化,这些变化可能具有真正的创新性和有用的临床影响。本研究旨在比较第 8 版 AJCC 分期系统中新引入的解剖学分期与预后分期组及其在临床实践中的重要性。我们回顾性分析了第 8 版 AJCC 分期系统中引入的预后分期组。我们根据第 8 版 AJCC 预后分期组标准重新分期了 2004 年至 2017 年期间的大量浸润性乳腺癌患者。本研究纳入了所有乳腺癌分子亚型的 1575 例患者。我们的随访包括无病生存(DFS)、疾病相关生存(DRS)和总生存(OS)数据。采用 Kaplan-Meier 检验进行统计学分析。中位随访时间为 7 年。5 年和 10 年 OS 分别为 96%和 90%。根据第 8 版,除三阴性肿瘤外,队列中的大多数患者降期至预后较好的组。大多数解剖学 IIA 期变为 IA 和 IB 期。这种新的分期系统似乎与预后更好地相关。因此,预后分期在乳腺癌管理中是一个重要的支持,因为它可以避免不必要和无效的治疗;相反,它可以帮助实现对复发/对特定治疗反应风险的全面评估,从而显著降低国家卫生成本。