Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Nov;43(23):3417-3424. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1735538. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
To describe and evaluate physical rehabilitation research in critically ill children, including physical rehabilitation intervention reporting.
We searched five electronic databases to 31 December 2018 for prospective physical rehabilitation studies conducted in pediatric intensive care units (PICU). Screening was conducted independently in duplicate. Study characteristics, outcomes, and interventions were extracted from included studies. Quality of study reporting was assessed using standardized tools. Completeness of physical rehabilitation intervention reporting was assessed using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT).
We included 20 studies enrolling a total of 2644 patients. Median (Q1,Q3) sample size was 57 (44,104). Seven studies (35%) were randomized controlled trials. Eleven studies (55%) evaluated respiratory interventions, most commonly multicomponent chest physiotherapy (73%). Nine studies (45%) evaluated physical activity interventions, most commonly progressive mobility (56%). The majority of stated outcomes (92.5%) were limited to the PICU setting. Median [Q1,Q3] quality of study reporting was good (77.2% [66.7%,87.4%]), and completeness of physical rehabilitation intervention reporting was moderate (61.9% [45.9%,71.5%]).
Physical rehabilitation studies in critically ill children were small, and focused on evaluating respiratory-based interventions and short-term PICU-based outcomes. Reporting of physical rehabilitation interventions was suboptimal. Use of CERT may improve design and reporting in future studies.Implications for rehabilitationWhile physical rehabilitation research in critically ill children is a growing field, there are currently few studies evaluating physical rehabilitation interventions in this population.Physical rehabilitation studies to date have been small, focused on evaluating respiratory-based interventions and short-term outcomes limited to the PICU setting.The reporting of physical rehabilitation interventions in this population is suboptimal, making it challenging for clinicians to reproduce interventions and appraise their efficacy or safety.
描述和评估危重症儿童的物理康复研究,包括物理康复干预措施的报告。
我们检索了五个电子数据库,截至 2018 年 12 月 31 日,以寻找在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)进行的前瞻性物理康复研究。筛选工作由两人独立进行。从纳入的研究中提取研究特征、结局和干预措施。使用标准化工具评估研究报告的质量。使用运动报告共识模板(CERT)评估物理康复干预措施报告的完整性。
我们纳入了 20 项共纳入 2644 例患者的研究。中位(Q1,Q3)样本量为 57(44,104)。7 项研究(35%)为随机对照试验。11 项研究(55%)评估了呼吸干预措施,最常见的是多组分胸部物理疗法(73%)。9 项研究(45%)评估了身体活动干预措施,最常见的是渐进式活动(56%)。大多数报告的结局(92.5%)仅限于 PICU 环境。研究报告质量的中位数[Q1,Q3]为良好(77.2%[66.7%,87.4%]),物理康复干预措施报告的完整性为中等(61.9%[45.9%,71.5%])。
危重症儿童的物理康复研究规模较小,主要集中在评估基于呼吸的干预措施和短期 PICU 结局。物理康复干预措施的报告并不完善。使用 CERT 可能会提高未来研究的设计和报告水平。
康复意义虽然危重症儿童的物理康复研究是一个不断发展的领域,但目前针对该人群的物理康复干预措施研究较少。
迄今为止的物理康复研究规模较小,主要集中在评估基于呼吸的干预措施和短期限于 PICU 环境的结局。
该人群的物理康复干预措施报告不完善,使得临床医生难以复制干预措施并评估其疗效或安全性。