O'Grady Heather K, Reid Julie C, Farley Christopher, Hanna Quincy E B, Unger Janelle, Zorko David J, Bosch Jackie, Turkstra Lyn S, Kho Michelle E
School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Explor. 2023 May 9;5(5):e0917. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000917. eCollection 2023 May.
To characterize comparator groups (CGs) in ICU-based studies of physical rehabilitation (PR), including the type, content, and reporting.
We followed a five-stage scoping review methodology, searching five databases from inception to June 30, 2022. Study selection and data extraction were completed independently, in duplicate.
We screened studies by title and abstract, then full-text. We included prospective studies with greater than or equal to two arms enrolling mechanically ventilated adults (≥ 18 yr), with any planned PR intervention initiated in the ICU.
We conducted a quantitative content analysis of authors' description of CG type and content. We categorized similar CG types (e.g., usual care), classified content into unique activities (e.g., positioning), and summarized these data using counts (proportions). We assessed reporting using Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT; proportion of reported items/total applicable).
One hundred twenty-five studies were included, representing 127 CGs. PR was planned in 112 CGs (88.2%; 110 studies), representing four types: usual care ( = 81, 63.8%), alternative treatment than usual care (e.g., different from intervention; = 18, 14.2%), alternative treatment plus usual care ( = 7, 5.5%), and sham ( = 6, 4.7%). Of 112 CGs with planned PR, 90 CGs (88 studies) reported 60 unique activities, most commonly passive range of motion ( = 47, 52.2%). The remaining 22 CGs (19.6%; 22 studies) reported vague descriptions. PR was not planned in 12 CGs (9.5%; 12 studies), and three CGs (2.4%; three studies) reported no details. Studies reported a median (Q1-Q3) of 46.6% (25.0-73.3%) CERT items. Overall, 20.0% of studies reported no detail to understand planned CG activities.
The most common type of CG was usual care. We identified heterogeneity in planned activities and CERT reporting deficiencies. Our results could help guide the selection, design, and reporting of CGs in future ICU-based PR studies.
为了描述基于重症监护病房(ICU)的物理康复(PR)研究中的对照群组(CGs),包括其类型、内容和报告情况。
我们遵循五阶段的范围综述方法,检索了从数据库建立到2022年6月30日的五个数据库。研究筛选和数据提取由两人独立完成,采用双份录入。
我们先通过标题和摘要筛选研究,然后进行全文筛选。我们纳入了前瞻性研究,该研究有两个或以上组,纳入机械通气的成年人(≥18岁),且在ICU启动了任何计划性的PR干预措施。
我们对作者对CG类型和内容的描述进行了定量内容分析。我们将相似的CG类型进行分类(如常规护理),将内容分为独特的活动(如体位摆放),并使用计数(比例)来总结这些数据。我们使用运动报告模板共识(CERT;报告项目数/总适用项目数的比例)来评估报告情况。
共纳入125项研究,代表127个CGs。112个CGs(88.2%;110项研究)计划进行PR,分为四种类型:常规护理(n = 81,63.8%)、与常规护理不同的替代治疗(如与干预不同;n = 18,14.2%)、替代治疗加常规护理(n = 7,5.5%)和假治疗(n = 6,4.7%)。在112个计划进行PR的CGs中,90个CGs(88项研究)报告了60种独特的活动,最常见的是被动关节活动度(n = 47,52.2%)。其余22个CGs(19.6%;22项研究)报告的描述模糊。12个CGs(9.5%;12项研究)未计划进行PR,3个CGs(2.4%;3项研究)未报告详细信息。研究报告的CERT项目中位数(四分位数间距)为46.6%(25.0 - 73.3%)。总体而言,20.0%的研究未报告详细信息以了解计划的CG活动。
最常见的CG类型是常规护理。我们发现计划活动存在异质性以及CERT报告存在缺陷。我们的结果有助于指导未来基于ICU的PR研究中CGs的选择、设计和报告。