• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较多发性硬化症患者使用利妥昔单抗原研药(美罗华)与生物类似药(拓咨)的情况。

Comparison of rituximab originator (MabThera) to biosimilar (Truxima) in patients with multiple sclerosis.

机构信息

Service Pharmacie, APHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France Institute of NeuroPhysiopathology (INP), CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurologie, APHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Mult Scler. 2021 Apr;27(4):585-592. doi: 10.1177/1352458520912170. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1177/1352458520912170
PMID:32180508
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rituximab's originator MabThera or Rituxan has demonstrated high efficacy in multiple sclerosis (MS). Because of the patent expiration, rituximab biosimilars have been developed. However, because a biosimilar is not the exact copy of the originator, the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar may significantly differ.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar Truxima and the originator MabThera in MS.

METHODS

Consecutive MS patients receiving MabThera or Truxima were prospectively followed during 1 year after treatment introduction. Allocation to each treatment depended on the period of introduction and not the physician's choice. Lymphocyte count, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and adverse events were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 105 and 40 patients received MabThera and Truxima, respectively. The two groups did not differ in baseline characteristics. Effect on CD19+ lymphocytes and disease activity were similar during follow-up. EDSS remained stable, with no difference between groups. Adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of the rituximab biosimilar Truxima seem equivalent to the originator MabThera in MS patients. Truxima could represent a relatively cheap and safe therapeutic alternative to MabThera and could improve access to highly efficient therapy for MS in low- or middle-income countries.

摘要

背景

利妥昔单抗的原研药美罗华或利妥昔单抗在多发性硬化症(MS)中显示出了很高的疗效。由于专利到期,利妥昔单抗生物类似药已经被开发出来。然而,由于生物类似药不是原研药的完全复制,其疗效和安全性可能会有显著差异。

目的

比较 MS 患者中利妥昔单抗生物类似药 Truxima 和原研药美罗华的疗效和安全性。

方法

连续接受美罗华或 Truxima 治疗的 MS 患者在治疗开始后 1 年内进行前瞻性随访。每种药物的分配取决于引入的时间段,而不是医生的选择。比较淋巴细胞计数、临床和磁共振成像(MRI)活动、扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)和不良反应。

结果

共有 105 例和 40 例患者分别接受了美罗华和 Truxima 治疗。两组患者在基线特征方面没有差异。在随访期间,CD19+淋巴细胞和疾病活动的影响相似。EDSS 保持稳定,两组之间没有差异。两组之间的不良反应相似。

结论

利妥昔单抗生物类似药 Truxima 在 MS 患者中的疗效和安全性似乎与原研药美罗华相当。Truxima 可能是一种相对便宜且安全的治疗选择,可以改善低收入和中等收入国家中 MS 患者获得高效治疗的机会。

相似文献

1
Comparison of rituximab originator (MabThera) to biosimilar (Truxima) in patients with multiple sclerosis.比较多发性硬化症患者使用利妥昔单抗原研药(美罗华)与生物类似药(拓咨)的情况。
Mult Scler. 2021 Apr;27(4):585-592. doi: 10.1177/1352458520912170. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
2
Comparison of outcomes using the rituximab originator MabThera with the biosimilar Truxima in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis.对比利妥昔单抗原研药 MabThera 与生物类似药 Truxima 治疗抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关性血管炎患者的结局。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2022 Mar;51(2):135-141. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2021.1926318. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
3
Rituximab Biosimilar Prevents Poor Outcomes of Microscopic Polyangiitis and Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis as Effectively as Rituximab Originator.利妥昔单抗生物类似药可有效预防显微镜下多血管炎和肉芽肿性多血管炎的不良结局,与利妥昔单抗原研药疗效相当。
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Aug;61(8):712-719. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.8.712.
4
Comparative study of efficacy and safety: Biosimilar rituximab versus originator rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus.疗效与安全性的比较研究:生物类似药利妥昔单抗与原研利妥昔单抗治疗天疱疮的对比
J Dermatol. 2024 Aug;51(8):1104-1107. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17329. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
5
Comparison of Rituximab originator (MabThera) to biosimilar (Truxima) in patients with immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.对比免疫介导性血栓性血小板减少性紫癜患者采用利妥昔单抗原研药(美罗华)和生物类似药(曲妥珠单抗)的效果。
Br J Haematol. 2019 Jun;185(5):912-917. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15874. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
Interchangeability and adverse events in originator-rituximab and its biosimilar (CT-P10) among rheumatic patients: a real-life experience.类风湿病患者中原创利妥昔单抗及其生物类似药(CT-P10)的可互换性和不良事件:真实体验。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;18(3):791-799. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03222-x. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
7
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Rituximab and Originator Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.生物类似药利妥昔单抗与原研利妥昔单抗治疗类风湿关节炎和非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BioDrugs. 2019 Oct;33(5):469-483. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00376-z.
8
Comparison of treatment retention of originator vs biosimilar products in clinical rheumatology practice in Sweden.比较瑞典临床风湿病学实践中原创药与生物类似药的治疗保留率。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 30;61(9):3596-3605. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab933.
9
Safety of switching between rituximab biosimilars in onco-hematology.在肿瘤血液学中,利妥昔单抗生物类似药之间转换的安全性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 16;11(1):5956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85563-1.
10
The clinical outcomes of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 (Truxima) with CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: real-world experience.利妥昔单抗生物类似药 CT-P10(Truxima)联合 CHOP 一线治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的临床结局:真实世界经验。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Jul;61(7):1575-1583. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1742906. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Generics, Biosimilars and Follow-On Non-Biologic Complex Drugs for Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review of the Regulatory and Clinical Implications for European Neurologists.多发性硬化症的仿制药、生物类似药和后续非生物复杂药物:欧洲神经科医生监管及临床意义的叙述性综述
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Apr;32(4):e70140. doi: 10.1111/ene.70140.
2
Comparative study of efficacy and safety: Biosimilar rituximab versus originator rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus.疗效与安全性的比较研究:生物类似药利妥昔单抗与原研利妥昔单抗治疗天疱疮的对比
J Dermatol. 2024 Aug;51(8):1104-1107. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17329. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
3
Clinical Similarity of Biosimilars and Reference Drugs: A Comprehensive Review and New Hope for Public Health in a New Frontier.
生物类似药与参比药品的临床相似性:全面综述及新前沿公共卫生的新希望
Curr Drug Res Rev. 2025;17(1):41-58. doi: 10.2174/0125899775246113231018080526.
4
A Developer's Perspective on Clinical Evidence and Benefits for Rituximab Biosimilar Uptake, with a Focus on CT-P10.从开发者视角看利妥昔单抗生物类似药的临床证据和获益,以 CT-P10 为例
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Apr;42(4):285-300. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01133-x. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis: Are We Ready for Regulatory Approval?利妥昔单抗治疗多发性硬化症:我们是否已准备好监管批准?
Front Immunol. 2021 Jul 6;12:661882. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.661882. eCollection 2021.
6
Rituximab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review.利妥昔单抗治疗多发性硬化症:综述
J Neurol. 2022 Jan;269(1):159-183. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10362-z. Epub 2021 Jan 8.