Tran Bryant W, Nowrouz Maliha Y, Dhillon Sabrina K, Xie Katherine K, Breslin Kathryn M, Golladay Gregory J
Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Mar 4;11:2151459320910844. doi: 10.1177/2151459320910844. eCollection 2020.
Music has emerged as a well-received medical intervention. Patients may be uncomfortable during total joint replacement, which can result in high sedation requirements. These requirements place elderly patients at risk for delirium. This study compares the effect of noise-cancellation versus music medicine on sedation requirements, pain, and opioid consumption during elective total knee replacement.
This prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center between July 2018 and July 2019. All participants underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with a combined spinal-epidural as their primary anesthetic and received noise-cancelling, wireless headphones. Patients in the control group received the noise-cancellation feature only, while patients in the experimental group were permitted to listen to music of their choice. Patients signaled a request for sedation by squeezing a noise-making rubber hippopotamus toy. The primary outcomes included whether sedation was requested by the participant, the number of sedation demand doses requested, and the amount of propofol sedation administered during the procedure. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, total opioid consumption, and time to first opioid request.
Seventy-one percent (n = 36) of patients agreed to participate in the study. Forty-four percent of participants in the noise-cancellation group and 19% of participants in the music group requested sedation ( = .25). The median propofol consumption was not different between groups (0 [0-6.7] µg/kg/min vs 0 [0-0] µg/kg/min, = .101 for noise cancellation vs music, respectively). Pain scores and opioid consumption were not different between groups.
To date, this is the first study to use Bluetooth communication, noise-cancellation, and an Internet-based music streaming service to determine whether this technology has an impact on outcomes during major orthopedic surgery.
As an isolated intervention, the benefits of music in a complex operating room environment may be overstated. However, music integration with noise-reduction technology and patient-controlled sedation may lead to a safer and more satisfying anesthetic. More research is needed to determine the nonpharmacologic interventions that will produce positive outcomes for the geriatric population.
音乐已成为一种广受欢迎的医学干预手段。全关节置换手术过程中患者可能会感到不适,这可能导致对镇静的高需求。这些需求使老年患者面临谵妄风险。本研究比较了在择期全膝关节置换手术中,噪声消除与音乐疗法对镇静需求、疼痛及阿片类药物消耗量的影响。
这项前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验于2018年7月至2019年7月在弗吉尼亚联邦大学医学中心进行。所有参与者均接受了以腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉作为主要麻醉方式的初次全膝关节置换术,并佩戴了具有噪声消除功能的无线耳机。对照组患者仅使用噪声消除功能,而实验组患者可收听他们选择的音乐。患者通过挤压一个会发声的橡胶河马玩具发出镇静请求信号。主要结局包括参与者是否请求镇静、请求的镇静需求剂量数量以及手术过程中给予的丙泊酚镇静剂量。次要结局包括术后疼痛评分、阿片类药物总消耗量以及首次请求使用阿片类药物的时间。
71%(n = 36)的患者同意参与研究。噪声消除组44%的参与者和音乐组19%的参与者请求镇静(P = 0.25)。两组之间丙泊酚消耗量的中位数无差异(噪声消除组为0[0 - 6.7]μg/kg/min,音乐组为0[0 - 0]μg/kg/min,噪声消除组与音乐组相比,P = 0.101)。两组之间疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗量无差异。
迄今为止,这是第一项使用蓝牙通信、噪声消除和基于互联网的音乐流媒体服务来确定该技术在大型骨科手术中是否对结局有影响的研究。
作为一种单独的干预措施,在复杂的手术室环境中,音乐的益处可能被夸大了。然而,将音乐与降噪技术及患者自控镇静相结合可能会带来更安全、更令人满意的麻醉效果。需要更多研究来确定能为老年人群带来积极结局的非药物干预措施。