Goyal Ram Kumar, Kato Yoko, Kawase Tsukasa, Suzuki Kentaro, Yamada Yashuhiro, Sharma Saurabh, Balasubramanian Sneha Chitra, Tanaka Riki, Miyatani Kyosuke, Daijiro Kojima
Department of Neurosurgery, GNRC Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Department of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Asian J Neurosurg. 2020 Feb 25;15(1):4-9. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_284_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
One of the popular treatment strategies for complex cerebral aneurysms with wide necks or low dome-to-neck ratios is stent-assisted coiling. The most widely used intracranial stents for stent-assisted coiling are Neuroform (NF) and Enterprise (EP) stents. The purposes of this study are to review the recent literature of the past 5 years to compare outcomes between the EP and NF stent-assist coiling systems so as to comment on the safety, efficacy, complications, and recurrence rate of stent-assisted coiling in general.
PubMed was used to search for all published literature of NF or EP stent-assisted coiling of unruptured cerebral aneurysms from January 2014 to August 2019 with the search terms of "Enterprise stent-assisted coiling," "Neuroform stent," and "Neuroform vs. Enterprise stent."
Twenty two publications met the inclusion criteria which encompass 1764 patients and 1873 aneurysms. Out of these 1873 aneurysms, 1007 aneurysms were treated with EP stent and 866 aneurysms were treated with NF stent. The overall outcome was low rates of thromboembolic complications (4.37%) and intracranial hemorrhage (1.13%), low permanent morbidity (1.70%) and mortality (0.40%), and lower rate of recanalization (11%). Data analysis shows an overall higher rate of complication and recurrence of aneurysm and lower overall rate of aneurysmal occlusion in the patients where EP stent was used in comparison to NF stent. However, this difference was not statistically significant.
The review of two stent-assisted coiling devices using EP and NF stents including 1873 aneurysms in 1764 patients revealed that overall, it is safe and effective with comparable outcomes.
对于宽颈或低瘤颈比的复杂脑动脉瘤,一种常用的治疗策略是支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术。用于支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的最广泛使用的颅内支架是Neuroform(NF)支架和Enterprise(EP)支架。本研究的目的是回顾过去5年的近期文献,比较EP和NF支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞系统的疗效,以便总体评价支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的安全性、有效性、并发症和复发率。
使用PubMed搜索2014年1月至2019年8月期间所有已发表的关于未破裂脑动脉瘤的NF或EP支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的文献,搜索词为“Enterprise支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术”、“Neuroform支架”和“Neuroform与Enterprise支架”。
22篇出版物符合纳入标准,涵盖1764例患者和1873个动脉瘤。在这1873个动脉瘤中,1007个动脉瘤采用EP支架治疗,866个动脉瘤采用NF支架治疗。总体结果是血栓栓塞并发症发生率低(4.37%)、颅内出血发生率低(1.13%)、永久性致残率低(1.70%)和死亡率低(0.40%),再通率较低(11%)。数据分析显示,与NF支架相比,使用EP支架的患者动脉瘤并发症和复发率总体较高,动脉瘤闭塞总体率较低。然而,这种差异无统计学意义。
对使用EP和NF支架的两种支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞装置进行的回顾,涉及1764例患者的1873个动脉瘤,结果显示总体而言,该方法安全有效,疗效相当。