• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为增进对患者和公众参与的了解:从与痴呆症患者护理人员共同研究的经验中得到的反思。

Adding to the knowledge on Patient and Public Involvement: Reflections from an experience of co-research with carers of people with dementia.

机构信息

Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Division of Psychiatry and Applied psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):691-706. doi: 10.1111/hex.13049. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13049
PMID:32181553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7321727/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in research ensures that publicly funded research reflects the priorities of the people who will be affected by its results. Co-research, a branch of PPI, is equal partnership between academic researchers and members of the public, who steer and conduct research together.

OBJECTIVES

To propose a model for good practice in co-researching with carers of people with dementia, by reporting and synthesizing the personal reflections of the academic and lay researchers around the methodological issues, benefits, and challenges of co-research.

DESIGN

An academic researcher and two lay researchers with lived experience of caring with someone with dementia collaborated in all stages of a qualitative research study, including development of the research protocol and topic guide, data collection, analysis and synthesis, and dissemination of findings. Throughout the study, the academic and lay researchers annotated reflections of their experience in personal diaries. Data from the diaries were synthesized and mapped out in a model for good practice in co-research.

RESULTS

Co-research yielded benefits for all those involved and on research outputs. There were practicalities and challenges that required extra resources, in order to make the involvement of lay researchers meaningful and effective.

DISCUSSION

The model for good practice illustrates overarching and stage-specific guidelines, which can inform researchers and members of the public wishing to undertake good practice in co-research.

摘要

背景

患者和公众参与(PPI)研究确保了由公众资助的研究反映了将受到其研究结果影响的人群的优先事项。共同研究是 PPI 的一个分支,是学术研究人员和公众之间的平等伙伴关系,他们共同指导和进行研究。

目的

通过报告和综合学术研究人员和非专业研究人员在共同研究痴呆症照顾者方面的方法学问题、收益和挑战方面的个人反思,为共同研究提出良好实践的模型。

设计

一位学术研究人员和两位有照顾痴呆症患者经验的非专业研究人员在定性研究的所有阶段都进行了合作,包括研究方案和主题指南的制定、数据收集、分析和综合以及研究结果的传播。在整个研究过程中,学术研究人员和非专业研究人员在个人日记中记录了他们的经验反思。从日记中综合和绘制了一个良好的共同研究实践模型。

结果

共同研究为所有参与者和研究成果带来了收益。有一些实际情况和挑战需要额外的资源,以便使非专业研究人员的参与具有意义和有效。

讨论

良好实践模型说明了总体和特定阶段的指导方针,这些指导方针可以为希望进行共同研究的研究人员和公众提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5915/7321727/703690fe0df2/HEX-23-691-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5915/7321727/7c2740c70427/HEX-23-691-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5915/7321727/809c6ef35126/HEX-23-691-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5915/7321727/703690fe0df2/HEX-23-691-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5915/7321727/7c2740c70427/HEX-23-691-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5915/7321727/809c6ef35126/HEX-23-691-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5915/7321727/703690fe0df2/HEX-23-691-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Adding to the knowledge on Patient and Public Involvement: Reflections from an experience of co-research with carers of people with dementia.为增进对患者和公众参与的了解:从与痴呆症患者护理人员共同研究的经验中得到的反思。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):691-706. doi: 10.1111/hex.13049. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
2
A SHARED study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges.一项关于设立一项涉及非专业共同研究者的健康研究的益处与成本的联合研究,以及我们是如何克服这些挑战的。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 3;2:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0021-3. eCollection 2016.
3
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
4
A Blueprint for Involvement: Reflections of lived experience co-researchers and academic researchers on working collaboratively.参与蓝图:生活经验共同研究者和学术研究者对合作的反思
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 5;8(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00404-3.
5
Patient and public involvement in dementia and neuroprogressive conditions: commentary from NHS Scotland based 'partners in research'.患者及公众参与痴呆症和神经退行性疾病:来自苏格兰国民保健服务体系“研究伙伴”的评论
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 6;11(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00669-w.
6
Facilitators and barriers to co-research by people with dementia and academic researchers: Findings from a qualitative study.痴呆症患者与学术研究人员共同开展研究的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究的结果
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):761-771. doi: 10.1111/hex.12891. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
7
Experiences of participant and public involvement in an international randomized controlled trial for people living with dementia and their informal caregivers.痴呆症患者及其非正式照护者参与一项国际随机对照试验的经验。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 May 2;10(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00574-2.
8
Patient and public involvement in international research: Perspectives of a team of researchers from six countries on collaborating with people with lived experiences of dementia and end-of-life.患者和公众参与国际研究:来自六个国家的研究团队与经历痴呆和临终患者合作的观点。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13942. doi: 10.1111/hex.13942.
9
It takes two to tango: carers' reflections on their participation and the participation of people with dementia in the James Lind Alliance process.二人转:照顾者对其参与以及痴呆症患者对 James Lind 联盟进程参与的反思。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 May 14;20(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01570-3.
10
Patient and Public Involvement in Technology-Related Dementia Research: Scoping Review.患者及公众参与技术相关痴呆症研究:范围综述
JMIR Aging. 2024 Mar 4;7:e48292. doi: 10.2196/48292.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the Scope, Intent and Extent of Published Conceptual Frameworks of Frameworks for Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research: A Rapid Scoping Review.理解患者及公众参与健康和社会护理研究的框架的已发表概念框架的范围、意图和程度:一项快速范围综述
Health Expect. 2025 Oct;28(5):e70425. doi: 10.1111/hex.70425.
2
Research in Partnership With Older People-Involvement in Conducting and Analysing Focus Groups.与老年人合作开展研究——参与焦点小组的实施与分析
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70354. doi: 10.1111/hex.70354.
3
Experience, Process, and Impact of Involving Informal Caregivers of People With Dementia as Public Contributors to Inform the Development of a Complex Intervention: A Mixed-Methods Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Embedding patient and public involvement: Managing tacit and explicit expectations.嵌入患者和公众参与:管理隐性和显性期望。
Health Expect. 2019 Dec;22(6):1231-1239. doi: 10.1111/hex.12952. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
2
Protocol for the process evaluation of the promoting activity, independence and stability in early dementia and mild cognitive impairment (PrAISED 2) randomised controlled trial.早期痴呆和轻度认知障碍(PrAISED 2)促进活动、独立性和稳定性的随机对照试验的过程评估方案。
Maturitas. 2019 Apr;122:8-21. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
3
Dementia care model: Promoting personhood through co-production.
让痴呆症患者的非正式照料者作为公众参与者参与复杂干预措施开发的经验、过程及影响:一项混合方法研究
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70382. doi: 10.1111/hex.70382.
4
Peer researchers in NHS research: approved in principle, undermined in practice?英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)研究中的同行研究者:原则上获批,实践中却受到破坏?
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00708-0.
5
Patient and public involvement in research published in the 2015-2021: A scoping review.2015 - 2021年发表的研究中患者及公众的参与:一项范围综述。
Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Jun;86(6):400-412. doi: 10.1177/03080226231165374. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
6
Lessons learned from the participatory development of a framework to actively involve people living with dementia, individuals from their social networks, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews: the DECIDE-SR study.从一个框架的参与式开发中吸取的经验教训:该框架旨在让痴呆症患者、其社交网络中的个人以及医疗保健专业人员积极参与系统评价,即DECIDE-SR研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Apr 30;11(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00719-x.
7
The Importance of Lived Experience: A Scoping Review on the Value of Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research.生活经历的重要性:关于患者和公众参与健康研究价值的范围综述
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70205. doi: 10.1111/hex.70205.
8
Establishing patient partners' roles on research teams: a scoping review.确定患者合作伙伴在研究团队中的角色:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Dec 18;10(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00664-1.
9
Moving beyond tokenism: Sustaining engagement of persons living with dementia in identifying emergency research priorities.超越形式主义:持续让痴呆症患者参与确定紧急研究重点。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1344-1352. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19269. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
10
Involvement of family caregivers in dementia care research: a scoping review protocol.家庭护理人员参与痴呆症护理研究:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 11;13(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02696-w.
痴呆症护理模式:通过共同创作促进个体的主体性。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Mar-Apr;81:59-73. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
4
Involving minority ethnic communities and diverse experts by experience in dementia research: The Caregiving HOPE Study.让少数族裔社区和具有不同痴呆症研究经验的专家参与进来:护理希望研究。
Dementia (London). 2018 Nov;17(8):990-1000. doi: 10.1177/1471301218789558.
5
Patient engagement in research related to dementia: A scoping review.患者参与痴呆症相关研究:一项范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2018 Nov;17(8):944-975. doi: 10.1177/1471301218789292.
6
Ticking boxes or meaningful partnership - The experience of lay representation, participant and study partner involvement in Brains for Dementia Research.打勾应付还是有意义的伙伴关系——痴呆症研究中患者代表、参与者及研究伙伴的参与体验
Dementia (London). 2018 Nov;17(8):1023-1034. doi: 10.1177/1471301218789308.
7
Reflections on PPI from the 'Action on Living Well: Asking You' advisory network of people with dementia and carers as part of the IDEAL study.作为IDEAL研究的一部分,痴呆症患者及护理人员的“健康生活行动:询问您”咨询网络对患者和公众参与(PPI)的思考。
Dementia (London). 2018 Nov;17(8):1035-1044. doi: 10.1177/1471301218789309.
8
'Of Mice and Dementia': A filmed conversation on the use of animals in dementia research.《小鼠与痴呆症》:一场关于痴呆症研究中动物使用的视频对话。
Dementia (London). 2018 Nov;17(8):1055-1063. doi: 10.1177/1471301218789560.
9
A development study and randomised feasibility trial of a tailored intervention to improve activity and reduce falls in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia.一项针对改善轻度认知障碍和轻度痴呆老年人活动能力及减少跌倒的定制干预措施的发展研究和随机可行性试验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Feb 17;4:49. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0239-y. eCollection 2018.
10
Co-research with adults with intellectual disability: A systematic review.与成年智障者的合作研究:一项系统综述。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Sep;31(5):669-686. doi: 10.1111/jar.12435. Epub 2017 Dec 12.