• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者个性化预防保健的支付效果。

Payer effects of personalized preventive care for patients with diabetes.

机构信息

L&M Policy Research, LLC, 1743 Connecticut Ave NW, Ste 200, Washington, DC 20009. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2020 Mar 1;26(3):e70-e75. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42638.

DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2020.42638
PMID:32181618
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of MD-Value in Prevention (MDVIP) enrollment on Medicare expenditures and utilization among fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries with diabetes over a 5-year period.

STUDY DESIGN

We obtained participating physician and beneficiary enrollment lists from MDVIP and Medicare FFS claims data through the Virtual Research Data Center to compare changes in outcomes, before and after enrollment dates, with those of nonenrolled beneficiaries receiving primary care in the same local market.

METHODS

We employed propensity score matching to identify comparison beneficiaries similar in observed characteristics and preenrollment trends. Individual fixed effects were used to control for time-consistent differences between treatment and comparison populations.

RESULTS

We found that enrollment is statistically associated with reductions in outpatient expenditures, Medicare expenditures in year 5, emergency department (ED) utilization, and unplanned inpatient admissions, accompanied by significant increases in evaluation and management visits and expenditures. Total Medicare expenditures over the 5-year period, as well as all inpatient admissions, were not statistically different between the MDVIP and comparison groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding of reduced unplanned inpatient admissions and ED utilization supports the previous findings regarding MDVIP enrollees. We did not find significant changes in overall third-party expenditures, although savings were estimated in year 5, the last year of observation, and may occur later. Our approach, however, strengthens controls for baseline characteristics of the population and uses a comparison population drawn from the same markets who do not experience the loss of their primary care physician at the time of enrollment.

摘要

目的

在 5 年期间内,研究 MD-Value 在预防(MDVIP)参与对服务付费(FFS)糖尿病受益人的医疗保险支出和利用的影响。

研究设计

我们从 MDVIP 和医疗保险 FFS 索赔数据中获得了参与医生和受益人的登记名单,通过虚拟研究数据中心将登记日期前后的结果变化与同一当地市场接受初级保健的未登记受益人的结果进行比较。

方法

我们采用倾向评分匹配来识别具有相似观察特征和预先登记趋势的对照受益人群体。使用个体固定效应来控制治疗和对照人群之间时间一致的差异。

结果

我们发现,登记与门诊支出、第 5 年的医疗保险支出、急诊部(ED)利用率和非计划住院入院的减少具有统计学相关性,同时评估和管理访问和支出显著增加。5 年内的总医疗保险支出以及所有住院入院均在 MDVIP 和对照组之间无统计学差异。

结论

我们发现非计划住院入院和 ED 利用率减少的结果支持先前关于 MDVIP 参与者的发现。尽管在观察的最后一年即第 5 年估计有节省,但我们没有发现第三方支出的总体显著变化,并且可能会在以后发生。然而,我们的方法加强了对人群基线特征的控制,并使用了从相同市场抽取的不经历主要保健医生在登记时失去的对照人群。

相似文献

1
Payer effects of personalized preventive care for patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者个性化预防保健的支付效果。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Mar 1;26(3):e70-e75. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42638.
2
Changes in Utilization and Expenditures for Medicare Beneficiaries in Patient-centered Medical Homes: Findings From the Multi-Payer Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration.以患者为中心的医疗之家中医疗保险受益人的利用和支出的变化:多付款人高级初级保健实践示范的研究结果。
Med Care. 2018 Sep;56(9):775-783. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000966.
3
Personalized preventive care reduces healthcare expenditures among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.个性化预防保健可降低医疗保险优势受益人的医疗保健支出。
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Aug;20(8):613-20.
4
Association of Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations vs traditional Medicare fee for service with spending, utilization, and patient experience.先驱责任医疗组织与传统 Medicare 按服务收费制在支出、利用和患者体验方面的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Jun 2;313(21):2152-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4930.
5
New approaches to measuring the comprehensiveness of primary care physicians.衡量初级保健医生全面性的新方法。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):356-366. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13101. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
6
Mortality, Hospitalizations, and Expenditures for the Medicare Population Aged 65 Years or Older, 1999-2013.1999 - 2013年65岁及以上医疗保险人群的死亡率、住院率和费用支出
JAMA. 2015 Jul 28;314(4):355-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8035.
7
Inappropriate Utilization in Fee-for-Service Medicare and Medicare Advantage Plans.按服务收费的医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划中的不当使用情况。
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):58-64. doi: 10.1177/1062860617702240. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
8
Utilization of health care services among Medicare beneficiaries who visit federally qualified health centers.在就诊于联邦合格健康中心的医疗保险受益人中医疗保健服务的利用情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2847-x.
9
A comparison by payor/provider type of the cost of dying among frail older adults.按付款人/提供者类型对体弱老年人临终成本进行的比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Sep;44(9):1098-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb02947.x.
10
Changes in Health Care Use Associated With the Introduction of Hospital Global Budgets in Maryland.马里兰州引入医院总额预算后医疗保健使用的变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):260-268. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7455.

引用本文的文献

1
Do VIP medical services damage efficiency? New evidence of medical institutions' total factor productivity using Chinese panel data.特需医疗服务是否损害效率?基于中国面板数据的医疗机构全要素生产率的新证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 24;11:1261804. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1261804. eCollection 2023.