• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Do VIP medical services damage efficiency? New evidence of medical institutions' total factor productivity using Chinese panel data.特需医疗服务是否损害效率?基于中国面板数据的医疗机构全要素生产率的新证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 24;11:1261804. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1261804. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of performance and impacts of maternal and child health hospital services using Data Envelopment Analysis in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China: a comparison study among poverty and non-poverty county level hospitals.运用数据包络分析法对中国广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院服务的绩效与影响进行评估:贫困与非贫困县级医院的比较研究
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Aug 23;15(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0420-y.
3
How Efficient are Basic Public Health Services Between Urban and Rural in Shandong Province, China? A Data Envelopment Analysis and Panel Tobit Regression Approach.中国山东省城乡基本公共卫生服务的效率如何?数据包络分析和面板Tobit回归方法。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Apr 19;15:727-738. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S354758. eCollection 2022.
4
Technical Efficiency Evaluation of Primary Health Care Institutions in Shenzhen, China, and Its Policy Implications under the COVID-19 Pandemic.中国深圳基层医疗机构技术效率评价及其在 COVID-19 大流行下的政策启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4453. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054453.
5
Evaluation of the allocation efficiency of medical and health resources in China's rural three-tier healthcare system.中国农村三级医疗卫生服务体系医疗资源配置效率评价。
Public Health. 2023 May;218:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
6
Measuring Productivity and Relative Efficiency of Public Tertiary Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals in Hubei, China.测量中国湖北省公立三级中医医院的生产力和相对效率。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231190576. doi: 10.1177/00469580231190576.
7
Evaluation of healthcare efficiency in China: a three-stage data envelopment analysis of directional slacks-based measure.中国医疗保健效率评估:基于三阶段数据包络分析的有向松弛测度方法
Front Public Health. 2024 May 30;12:1393143. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1393143. eCollection 2024.
8
Efficiency and productivity of county-level traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in Hubei Province, China: A retrospective study based on 17 years of panel data.中国湖北省县级中医医院的效率和生产力:基于 17 年面板数据的回顾性研究。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1308-1325. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3171. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
9
[Assessment and comparison of hospital operating efficiency under different management systems].不同管理体制下医院运营效率的评估与比较
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Jun 18;49(3):483-488.
10
Levels, trends, and determinants of effectiveness on the hierarchical medical system in China: Data envelopment analysis and bootstrapping truncated regression analysis.中国分级诊疗制度实施效果的水平、趋势及决定因素:数据包络分析和Bootstrap 截断回归分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;10:921303. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.921303. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
On resource allocation in health care: The case of concierge medicine.医疗资源配置:私人医生模式案例分析
J Health Econ. 2023 Jul;90:102776. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102776. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
2
Why VIP Services Are Ethically Indefensible in Health Care.为何医疗保健中的贵宾服务在伦理上站不住脚。
AMA J Ethics. 2023 Jan 1;25(1):E66-71. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.66.
3
BEHAVIORAL HAZARD IN HEALTH INSURANCE.健康保险中的行为风险
Q J Econ. 2015 Nov;130(4):1623-1667. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjv029. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
4
How Efficient are Basic Public Health Services Between Urban and Rural in Shandong Province, China? A Data Envelopment Analysis and Panel Tobit Regression Approach.中国山东省城乡基本公共卫生服务的效率如何?数据包络分析和面板Tobit回归方法。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Apr 19;15:727-738. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S354758. eCollection 2022.
5
Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies.支付意愿影响因素的研究:基于条件价值评估法的系统综述
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Dec;23(9):1455-1482. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01437-x. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Efficiency and Productivity of Public Hospitals in Serbia Using DEA-Malmquist Model and Tobit Regression Model, 2015-2019.塞尔维亚公立医院的效率和生产力:基于 DEA-Malmquist 模型和 Tobit 回归模型的 2015-2019 年分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23):12475. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312475.
7
Evaluating the role and value of a clinical pharmacist in a concierge primary care clinic.评估一名临床药师在会员制基础医疗诊所中的角色和价值。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 May-Jun;61(3):240-247.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.12.014. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
8
Concierge care and patient reviews.礼宾服务与患者评价。
Health Econ. 2020 Aug;29(8):913-922. doi: 10.1002/hec.4028. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
9
Payer effects of personalized preventive care for patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者个性化预防保健的支付效果。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Mar 1;26(3):e70-e75. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42638.
10
Charity Care Provision by US Nonprofit Hospitals.美国非营利性医院的慈善医疗服务提供
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):606-607. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7415.

特需医疗服务是否损害效率?基于中国面板数据的医疗机构全要素生产率的新证据。

Do VIP medical services damage efficiency? New evidence of medical institutions' total factor productivity using Chinese panel data.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 24;11:1261804. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1261804. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1261804
PMID:38328541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10847260/
Abstract

This study examines the causal impact of very important person (VIP) medical services on hospital total factor productivity in Deyang, a prefectural-level city in western China, spanning the years 2015-2020. This aims to offer empirical evidence and policy recommendations for the implementation of VIP practices in the medical field. A secondary unbalanced panel dataset of 416 observations was collected from the annual reports of the Health Commission and 92 eligible medical institutions were included. This study utilized a two-stage strategy. First, the Global Malmquist index was used to calculate the total factor productivity and its decomposition terms for hospitals from 2015 to 2020. In the second stage, two-way fixed effects models and Tobit models were used to identify the relationship between VIP medical services and hospital efficiency; instrumental variables were used to solve potential endogeneity problems in the model. The results showed that VIP medical services had a significantly negative impact on medical institutions' efficiency. The technological advances and pure technical efficiency related to VIP medical care may help explain these negative impacts, which were heterogeneous across groups divided by the nature of the hospital and the outside environment. It is imperative to prioritize the standardized provision of VIP medical services for medical institutions, optimize management and service process, enhance the training of clinical and scientific research capabilities of medical personnel, and scientifically allocate resources for both VIP and general medical services. This will help mitigate health inequality while improving the overall quality of medical services.

摘要

本研究考察了 VIP 医疗服务对中国西部德阳市医院全要素生产率的因果影响,时间跨度为 2015 年至 2020 年。旨在为医疗领域实施 VIP 实践提供经验证据和政策建议。从卫生委员会的年度报告中收集了一个 416 个观测值的二级非平衡面板数据集,其中包括 92 家合格的医疗机构。本研究采用了两阶段策略。首先,使用全局 Malmquist 指数计算了 2015 年至 2020 年医院的全要素生产率及其分解项。在第二阶段,使用双向固定效应模型和 Tobit 模型来确定 VIP 医疗服务与医院效率之间的关系;使用工具变量来解决模型中的潜在内生性问题。结果表明,VIP 医疗服务对医疗机构的效率有显著的负面影响。与 VIP 医疗相关的技术进步和纯技术效率可能有助于解释这些负面影响,这些负面影响在按医院性质和外部环境划分的组之间存在异质性。当务之急是优先为医疗机构提供标准化的 VIP 医疗服务,优化管理和服务流程,加强对医务人员临床和科研能力的培训,并为 VIP 和普通医疗服务科学分配资源。这将有助于减轻健康不平等,同时提高整体医疗服务质量。