Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, NC, USA.
Epidemiology of Allergic and Respiratory Diseases Department (EPAR), Pierre Louise Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health (IPLESP UMRS1136), UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Saint-Antoine Medical School, Sorbonne Universités, Paris.
J Agromedicine. 2021 Apr;26(2):97-108. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2020.1713274. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
: Respiratory hazards of farming have been identified for centuries, with little focus on gender differences. We used data from the AGRICOH consortium, a collective of prospective cohorts of agricultural workers, to assess respiratory disease prevalence among adults in 18 cohorts representing over 200,000 farmers, farm workers, and their spouses from six continents.: Cohorts collected data between 1992 and 2016 and ranged in size from 200 to >128,000 individuals; 44% of participants were female. Farming practices varied from subsistence farming to large-scale industrial agriculture. All cohorts provided respiratory outcome information for their cohort based on their study definitions. The majority of outcomes were based on self-report using standard respiratory questionnaires; the greatest variability in assessment methods was associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).: For all three respiratory symptoms (cough, phlegm, and wheeze), the median prevalence in men was higher than in women, with the greatest difference for phlegm (17% vs. 10%). For asthma, women had a higher prevalence (7.8% vs 6.5%), with the difference associated with allergic asthma. The relative proportion of allergic asthma varied among cohorts. In two of eight cohorts for women and two of seven cohorts for men, allergic asthma was more common than non-allergic asthma.: These findings indicate that respiratory outcomes are common among farmers around the world despite differences in agricultural production. As women in the general population are at higher risk of asthma, exploring gender differences in occupational studies is critical for a deeper understanding of respiratory disease among agricultural workers.
农业劳动的呼吸危害已被认识了数个世纪,但一直较少关注性别差异。我们使用农业职业人群合作研究(AGRICOH)联盟的数据,该联盟是由从事农业劳动的前瞻性队列组成的集合,评估了来自六大洲 18 个队列中超过 20 万名农民、农场工人及其配偶的成年人群中呼吸疾病的患病率。队列收集的时间在 1992 年至 2016 年之间,规模从 200 人到 128000 人以上不等;44%的参与者为女性。农业实践从自给农业到大规模工业化农业不等。所有队列均根据其研究定义为队列提供呼吸结局信息。大多数结局都是基于使用标准呼吸问卷的自我报告;评估方法的最大差异与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)有关。对于所有三种呼吸症状(咳嗽、咳痰和喘息),男性的中位患病率均高于女性,咳痰的差异最大(17%对 10%)。对于哮喘,女性的患病率更高(7.8%对 6.5%),差异与过敏性哮喘有关。过敏性哮喘在队列中的相对比例有所不同。在 8 个女性队列中有两个,7 个男性队列中有两个,过敏性哮喘比非过敏性哮喘更为常见。这些发现表明,尽管农业生产存在差异,但世界各地的农民中呼吸结局都很常见。由于一般人群中的女性哮喘风险较高,因此在职业研究中探索性别差异对于深入了解农业工人的呼吸疾病至关重要。