Suppr超能文献

多参数前列腺 MRI 预测前列腺癌 NCCN 危险分级外侵的性能:对手术规划的影响。

Performance of prostate multiparametric MRI for prediction of prostate cancer extra-prostatic extension according to NCCN risk categories: implication for surgical planning.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA -

Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy -

出版信息

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Dec;72(6):746-754. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03688-7. Epub 2020 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prediction of extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) is of utmost importance. Great variability in the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been reported for prediction of EPE. The present study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of mpMRI for predicting EPE in different National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk categories.

METHODS

Overall 664 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with a staging mpMRI were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective study. Patients with mpMRI report non-compliant with PI-RADSv2.0, were excluded. Patients were stratified according to NCCN criteria: very low/low (VLR-LR) to High Risk (HR) in order to assess final pathology EPE rates (focal and established). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of staging mpMRI were computed in each group. Univariable and multivariable analysis were used to evaluate predictors of positive surgical margins.

RESULTS

Pathological evaluation demonstrated established and focal EPE in 60 (9%) and 106 (16%) patients, respectively, while mpMRI suspicion for EPE was present in 180 (27%) patients. Age, preoperative PSA, PSA density, number of positive cores, NCCN groups, prostate volume, mpMRI suspicion for EPE, PIRADSv2.0 and lesion size differed significantly between the patients with any EPE and without EPE (all P≤0.05). The sensitivity of mpMRI in detecting any EPE varied from 12% (95% CI: 0.6-53%) in VLR-LR to 83% (66-93%) in HR while the corresponding values for the specificity were 92% (85-96%) and 63% (45-78%), respectively. Patients with false-negative mpMRI EPE prediction were more likely to have positive surgical margins in univariable (OR: 2.14; CI: 1.18, 3.87) as well as multivariable analysis adjusting for NCCN risk categories (OR: 1.97; CI: 1.08, 3.60).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of mpMRI for prediction of EPE varies greatly between different NCCN risk categories with a low positive predicting value in patients at low to favorable intermediate risk and a low negative predictive value in patients at Unfavorable intermediate to high risk PCa. Given that mpMRI EPE misdiagnosis could have a negative impact on oncological and functional outcomes, NCCN risk categories should be considered when interpreting mpMRI findings in PCa patients.

摘要

背景

预测接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的男性是否存在前列腺外延伸(EPE)至关重要。多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)在预测 EPE 方面的表现存在很大差异。本研究旨在确定 mpMRI 对不同美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)风险类别的 EPE 预测的诊断性能。

方法

本单中心回顾性研究共纳入 664 例接受根治性前列腺切除术和分期 mpMRI 的患者。排除了 mpMRI 报告不符合 PI-RADSv2.0 标准的患者。根据 NCCN 标准将患者分为极低/低危(VLR-LR)到高危(HR),以评估最终病理 EPE 率(局灶性和已建立的)。在每组中计算了分期 mpMRI 的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。采用单变量和多变量分析评估阳性手术切缘的预测因素。

结果

病理评估显示 60 例(9%)患者存在已建立的 EPE 和 106 例(16%)患者存在局灶性 EPE,而 180 例(27%)患者的 mpMRI 提示 EPE。年龄、术前 PSA、PSA 密度、阳性核心数量、NCCN 组、前列腺体积、mpMRI 提示 EPE、PI-RADSv2.0 和病变大小在有 EPE 和无 EPE 的患者之间差异有统计学意义(均 P≤0.05)。mpMRI 检测任何 EPE 的敏感性在 VLR-LR 中为 12%(95%CI:0.6-53%),在 HR 中为 83%(66-93%),相应的特异性分别为 92%(85-96%)和 63%(45-78%)。在单变量(OR:2.14;CI:1.18,3.87)和多变量分析中(OR:1.97;CI:1.08,3.60),假阴性 mpMRI EPE 预测的患者更有可能出现阳性手术切缘。

结论

mpMRI 对不同 NCCN 风险类别的 EPE 预测性能差异很大,在低危至中危有利的患者中阳性预测值较低,在中危至高危 PCa 患者中阴性预测值较低。鉴于 mpMRI EPE 误诊可能对肿瘤学和功能结果产生负面影响,在解读 PCa 患者的 mpMRI 结果时应考虑 NCCN 风险类别。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验