• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关爱家庭伙伴关系量表(SPIC-F)的编制与验证。

Development and Validation of the Scale for Partnership in Care-for Family (SPIC-F).

机构信息

College of Nursing, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 13;17(6):1882. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061882.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17061882
PMID:32183211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7143286/
Abstract

This study aims to develop and validate the Scale for Partnership in Care between staff and families of older adult nursing home (NH) residents-for Family (SPIC-F). The components of partnership were identified on the basis of literature reviews and focus group interviews. The content validity of 41 preliminary items was verified by 10 experts, and a pilot study was conducted. The reliability and validity of the instrument was tested on 330 families of older adult NH residents. The final instrument comprised 20 items in three categories: professional caring and support, cooperative relationship and information sharing, and participation in care. Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 20-80. The reliability of the instrument was 0.95, and test-retest ICC was 0.83. This instrument could be utilized to develop interventions to establish an efficient partnership and assess its outcomes.

摘要

本研究旨在开发和验证用于老年护理院(NH)居民家庭的员工与家庭之间护理合作量表(SPIC-F)。合作的组成部分是根据文献回顾和焦点小组访谈确定的。通过 10 名专家对 41 个初步项目进行了内容有效性验证,并进行了试点研究。该工具的信度和效度在 330 名老年 NH 居民家庭中进行了测试。最终工具包括三个类别中的 20 个项目:专业护理和支持、合作关系和信息共享以及参与护理。每个项目的评分标准为四点李克特量表,总分为 20-80 分。该工具的信度为 0.95,测试-重测 ICC 为 0.83。该工具可用于制定干预措施以建立有效的合作关系并评估其结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7285/7143286/a6650467513d/ijerph-17-01882-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7285/7143286/10e4250382a3/ijerph-17-01882-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7285/7143286/a6650467513d/ijerph-17-01882-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7285/7143286/10e4250382a3/ijerph-17-01882-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7285/7143286/a6650467513d/ijerph-17-01882-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Scale for Partnership in Care-for Family (SPIC-F).关爱家庭伙伴关系量表(SPIC-F)的编制与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 13;17(6):1882. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061882.
2
Development and validation of the Scale for Staff-Family Partnership in Long-term Care (SSFPLC).长期照护员工-家庭伙伴关系量表(SSFPLC)的编制与验证。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 Mar;17(2):e12426. doi: 10.1111/opn.12426. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
Quality evaluation questionnaires - nursing homes (QEQ-NH); validation of questionnaires for measuring quality of care in nursing homes from various perspectives.质量评估问卷-养老院(QEQ-NH);从不同角度验证测量养老院护理质量的问卷。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 13;21(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06823-4.
4
Nurses' Empowerment Scale for ICU patients' families: an instrument development study.重症监护病房患者家属的护士赋权量表:一项工具开发研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2016 Sep;21(5):e11-21. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12106. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
5
An instrument to assess the education needs of nursing assistants within a palliative approach in residential aged care facilities.评估安养院姑息护理模式下护理助理教育需求的工具。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jul 23;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0447-0.
6
Validation of family conflict scales for family caregivers of persons with dementia in long-term care facilities and exploration of family conflicts and support.验证长期护理机构痴呆患者家庭照顾者的家庭冲突量表,探讨家庭冲突和支持。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 May;30(5):749-759. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217002356. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
7
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Caring Scale for Institutionalized Elders.养老机构老年人关怀量表的编制与心理测量学评价
J Nurs Res. 2017 Apr;25(2):140-148. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000147.
8
Development and psychometric testing of a Chinese-language instrument for assessing institutionalised older males' motivations for living.中文量表评估机构老年男性生活动机的编制与心理测量学检验
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Oct;22(19-20):2867-75. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12089. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
9
Development and validation of 'caring ability of family caregivers of patients with cancer scale (CAFCPCS)'.癌症患者家庭照顾者关怀能力量表(CAFCPCS)的编制与验证
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Dec;34(4):899-908. doi: 10.1111/scs.12797. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
10
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Quality of Dying in Long-term Care (QoD-LTC and QoD-LTC-C) scales by caregivers in nursing homes.养老院护理人员对长期护理临终质量量表(QoD-LTC 和 QoD-LTC-C)的文化调适和验证。
Psychogeriatrics. 2023 Nov;23(6):1061-1070. doi: 10.1111/psyg.13030. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing the Quality of Care in Long-Term Care Settings.提升长期照护环境中的照护质量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):1409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031409.
2
Development and validation of the Scale for Staff-Family Partnership in Long-term Care (SSFPLC).长期照护员工-家庭伙伴关系量表(SSFPLC)的编制与验证。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 Mar;17(2):e12426. doi: 10.1111/opn.12426. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices.量表开发:提高未来研究实践的十个主要局限性及建议
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2017 Jan 25;30(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1.
2
[Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study on Caring Experience of Spouses of Elderly People with Dementia at Home].[居家痴呆老人配偶照护体验的诠释现象学研究]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2017 Jun;47(3):367-379. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2017.47.3.367.
3
Development and Testing of the Partnership Scale for Primary Family Caregivers Caring for Patients With Dementia.
痴呆症患者初级家庭照顾者伙伴关系量表的开发与测试
J Fam Nurs. 2016 Aug;22(3):339-67. doi: 10.1177/1074840716656450. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
4
[The experience of adult Korean children caring for parents institutionalized with dementia].[成年韩国子女照顾患有痴呆症而入住养老院的父母的经历]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2014 Feb;44(1):41-54. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2014.44.1.41.
5
To use or not to use. A literature review of factors that influence family caregivers' use of support services.用还是不用。影响家庭照顾者使用支持服务的因素的文献综述。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2013 Jan;39(1):20-8; quiz 29. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20121107-02.
6
Developing a scale to measure trust in health promotion partnerships.开发一个衡量健康促进伙伴关系信任的量表。
Health Promot Int. 2011 Dec;26(4):484-91. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar007. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
7
Staff-family relationships in nursing home care: a typology of challenging behaviours.养老院护理中的员工-家庭关系:挑战性行为的类型学。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2007 Sep;2(3):213-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2007.00075.x.
8
Recent evidence on the development and maintenance of constructive staff-family relationships in the care of older people--a report on a systematic review update.关于在老年人护理中建设性员工-家庭关系的发展和维持的最新证据——系统评价更新报告。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2010 Jun;8(2):45-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00165.x.
9
Decision-making process of nursing home placement among Chinese family caregivers.养老院安置决策过程中的中国家庭照顾者。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2010 Apr;46(2):108-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6163.2010.00246.x.
10
The Nature of Staff - Family Interactions in Nursing Homes: Staff Perceptions.养老院中员工与家属互动的本质:员工认知
J Aging Stud. 2009 Aug;23(3):168-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2007.11.003.