Department of Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 3rd floor SIMR building, 2 Wanglang road, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Joint Bone Spine. 2020 Jul;87(4):327-330. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
To characterize inpatient prevalence and resource utilization of patients with polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM).
Patients with PM/DM were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from the year 2005 to 2014 using ICD-9 diagnostic codes. The primary outcome of this study was inpatient prevalence of PM/DM in the United States across the span of 10 years. Secondary outcomes included reason for hospitalization, inpatient mortality, morbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), utilization of specialized procedures/tests and expenditures. A cohort of patients without PM/DM was also identified from the same database to serve as comparators. Multivariate regression analysis was used to adjust for age, sex, ethnicity, comorbidities and hospital characteristics.
A total of 160,528 admissions of patients with a diagnosis of PM/DM occurred in the study period, corresponding to the inpatient prevalence of 41.9 cases per 100,000 discharges. During admission, patients with PM/DM died more frequently than patients without PM/DM with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 2.22 (P<0.01). A significantly higher inpatient morbidity among patients with PM/DM was also observed as indicated by a significantly higher risk of shock (aOR 2.33; P<0.01), acute kidney injury (aOR 1.12; P<0.01), multi-organ failure (aOR 1.83; P<0.01) and need for admission to intensive care unit (aOR 1.94; P<0.01). Patients in the PM/DM had an average of 1.7 more days of LOS (P<0.01). The mean hospital costs and total hospitalization charges for patients with PM/DM were significantly higher than patients without PM/DM with additional adjusted mean of $4,217 and $13,531, respectively, in the multivariate model. Patients with PM/DM underwent computerized tomography scan (aOR 1.90; P<0.01), magnetic resonance imaging (aOR 1.68; P<0.01) and angiography (aOR 1.15; P<0.01) more often than comparators.
Inpatient prevalence of PM/DM was higher than what would be expected from the overall incidence. Hospitalizations of patients with PM/DM were associated with significantly higher rate of mortality, morbidity and resource utilization.
描述多发性肌炎(PM)和皮肌炎(DM)患者的住院患病率和资源利用情况。
使用国际疾病分类第 9 版(ICD-9)诊断代码,从 2005 年至 2014 年的全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库中确定 PM/DM 患者。本研究的主要结局是在美国 10 年期间 PM/DM 的住院患病率。次要结局包括住院原因、住院死亡率、发病率、住院时间(LOS)、特殊程序/检查的利用情况和支出。还从同一数据库中确定了一组没有 PM/DM 的患者作为对照组。多变量回归分析用于调整年龄、性别、种族、合并症和医院特征。
在研究期间,共发生 160528 例诊断为 PM/DM 的患者住院,住院患病率为每 100000 次出院 41.9 例。与没有 PM/DM 的患者相比,PM/DM 患者死亡的几率更高,调整后的优势比(aOR)为 2.22(P<0.01)。PM/DM 患者的住院发病率也明显更高,表现为休克(aOR 2.33;P<0.01)、急性肾损伤(aOR 1.12;P<0.01)、多器官衰竭(aOR 1.83;P<0.01)和需要入住重症监护病房(aOR 1.94;P<0.01)的风险显著增加。PM/DM 患者的 LOS 平均延长 1.7 天(P<0.01)。在多变量模型中,PM/DM 患者的平均医院费用和总住院费用分别比没有 PM/DM 的患者高 4217 美元和 13531 美元,分别高出 4217 美元和 13531 美元。PM/DM 患者比对照组更常接受计算机断层扫描(aOR 1.90;P<0.01)、磁共振成像(aOR 1.68;P<0.01)和血管造影(aOR 1.15;P<0.01)。
PM/DM 的住院患病率高于总体发病率。PM/DM 患者的住院与死亡率、发病率和资源利用率显著增加有关。