Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1400 McKean Road, PO Box 776, Spring House, Pennsylvania, 19477, USA.
AAPS J. 2020 Mar 17;22(3):61. doi: 10.1208/s12248-020-00441-4.
Disease status is often measured with bounded outcome scores (BOS) which report a discrete set of values on a finite range. The distribution of such data is often non-standard, such as J- or U-shaped, for which standard analysis methods assuming normal distribution become inappropriate. Most BOS analysis methods aim to either predict the data within its natural range or accommodate data skewness, but not both. In addition, a frequent modeling objective is to predict clinical response of treatment using derived disease endpoints, defined as meeting certain criteria of improvement from baseline in disease status. This objective has not yet been addressed in existing BOS data analyses. This manuscript compares a recently proposed beta distribution-based approach with the standard continuous analysis approach, using an established mechanism-based longitudinal exposure-response model to analyze data from two phase 3 clinical studies in psoriatic patients. The beta distribution-based approach is shown to be superior in describing the BOS data and in predicting the derived endpoints, along with predicting the response time course of a highly sensitive subpopulation.
疾病状况通常使用有界结局评分(BOS)进行测量,BOS 在有限范围内报告一组离散的值。此类数据的分布通常是非标准的,例如 J 形或 U 形,对于这种数据,假设正态分布的标准分析方法变得不合适。大多数 BOS 分析方法旨在预测数据在其自然范围内或适应数据偏斜,而不能同时兼顾两者。此外,建模的一个常见目标是使用衍生的疾病终点来预测治疗的临床反应,定义为满足疾病状态从基线改善的某些标准。在现有的 BOS 数据分析中,这一目标尚未得到解决。本文使用基于已建立的基于机制的纵向暴露-反应模型的两个银屑病患者的 3 期临床试验数据,比较了最近提出的基于贝塔分布的方法和标准连续分析方法。结果表明,基于贝塔分布的方法在描述 BOS 数据和预测衍生终点方面具有优越性,同时还可以预测高度敏感亚组的反应时程。