• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项前瞻性随机试验比较了预期低反应、正常反应和高反应患者在接受 IVF 控制性卵巢刺激时,使用 Corifollitropin-α 晚起始(第 4 天)与标准起始(第 2 天)的效果。

A prospective randomized trial comparing corifollitropin-α late-start (day 4) versus standard administration (day 2) in expected poor, normal, and high responders undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF.

机构信息

Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, S. Anna Hospital, University of Torino, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Clinical Statistics, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Bramante 88, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 May;37(5):1163-1170. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01742-5. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10815-020-01742-5
PMID:32185595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7244653/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether corifollitropin-α (CFα) late-start administration (day 4) and standard administration (day 2) can obtain similar oocyte yield and live birth rate.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

University Hospital IVF Unit.

PATIENTS

One hundred thirteen women undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients distributed in three subgroups (expected poor, normal, or high responders to FSH) were randomized into two treatment arms: (a) CFα late-start: CFα on day 4 + GnRH antagonist from day 8 + (when needed) recFSH from day 11; (b) CFα standard start: CFα on day 2 + GnRH antagonist from day 6 + (when needed) recFSH from day 9. IVF or ICSI was performed as indicated.

RESULTS

Considering the whole study group, the late-start regimen obtained comparable oocyte yield (8.9 ± 5.6 vs. 8.8 ± 6.2; p = n.s.), cPR/started cycle (25% vs. 31.6%, p = n.s.), and cumulative live birth rate (LBR)/ovum pickup (OPU) (29.2% vs. 37.7%, p = n.s.) than the standard regimen. The outcome of the two regimens was comparable in the two subgroups of high and normal responders. Differently, in poor responders, oocyte yield was similar, but LBR/OPU was significantly lower with late-start CFα administration that caused 40% cancellation rate due to monofollicular response. ROC curves showed that the threshold AMH levels associated with cycle cancellation were 0.6 ng/ml for late-start regimen and 0.2 ng/ml for standard regimen.

CONCLUSION

CFα may be administered on either day 2 or day 4 to patients with expected high or normal response to FSH without compromising oocyte yield and/or live birth rate. Differently, late-start administration is not advisable for expected poor responders with AMH ≤ 0.6 ng/ml.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03816670.

摘要

目的

评估促卵泡素-α(CFα)起始延迟(第 4 天)与标准起始(第 2 天)给药能否获得相似的卵母细胞产量和活产率。

研究设计

随机对照试验。

设置

大学医院 IVF 单位。

患者

113 名接受 IVF 的女性。

干预措施

患者分为三组(预期低、中、高 FSH 反应者),随机分为两组治疗组:(a)CFα 起始延迟:第 4 天给予 CFα+第 8 天给予 GnRH 拮抗剂+第 11 天(必要时)给予 recFSH;(b)CFα 标准起始:第 2 天给予 CFα+第 6 天给予 GnRH 拮抗剂+第 9 天(必要时)给予 recFSH。根据需要进行 IVF 或 ICSI。

结果

考虑整个研究组,延迟起始方案获得了相似的卵母细胞产量(8.9±5.6 对 8.8±6.2;p=无显著性差异)、临床妊娠率/起始周期(25%对 31.6%;p=无显著性差异)和累积活产率/取卵(29.2%对 37.7%;p=无显著性差异),与标准方案相当。在高反应和正常反应的两个亚组中,两种方案的结果相当。不同的是,在低反应者中,卵母细胞产量相似,但使用延迟起始 CFα 治疗时,活产率显著降低,导致 40%的周期取消,原因是单卵泡反应。ROC 曲线显示,与周期取消相关的 AMH 水平的临界值为延迟起始方案的 0.6ng/ml 和标准方案的 0.2ng/ml。

结论

对于预期高或中 FSH 反应的患者,CFα 可在第 2 天或第 4 天给予,而不会影响卵母细胞产量和/或活产率。不同的是,对于 AMH≤0.6ng/ml 的预期低反应者,不建议使用延迟起始给药。

试验注册

NCT03816670。

相似文献

1
A prospective randomized trial comparing corifollitropin-α late-start (day 4) versus standard administration (day 2) in expected poor, normal, and high responders undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF.一项前瞻性随机试验比较了预期低反应、正常反应和高反应患者在接受 IVF 控制性卵巢刺激时,使用 Corifollitropin-α 晚起始(第 4 天)与标准起始(第 2 天)的效果。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 May;37(5):1163-1170. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01742-5. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
2
Efficacy and safety of late-start Corifollitropin-alfa administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF: a cohort, case-control study.晚期启动注射用重组促卵泡素α在体外受精控制性卵巢刺激中的疗效及安全性:一项队列病例对照研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Mar;32(3):429-34. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0426-6. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
3
Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.Corifollitropin alfa 序贯高纯度 HMG 与重组 FSH 在年轻卵巢低反应患者中的应用:一项多中心随机对照临床试验。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Nov 1;32(11):2225-2233. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex296.
4
Large, comparative, randomized double-blind trial confirming noninferiority of pregnancy rates for corifollitropin alfa compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in older patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.大型、比较性、随机双盲试验证实,在接受体外受精的老年患者中,使用促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂控制性卵巢刺激方案时,与重组促卵泡激素相比,注射用重组促卵泡素α的妊娠率具有非劣效性。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):94-103.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 May 21.
5
Corifollitropin alfa compared with follitropin beta in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized controlled trial.Corifollitropin alfa 与 follitropin beta 在接受 ICSI 的反应不良者中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):432-40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu301. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
6
Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射的传统卵巢刺激和单胚胎移植。在利用所有新鲜和冷冻胚胎后,我们需要多少个卵母细胞才能使累积活产率最大化?
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):370-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev316. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
7
Risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol: RCT including 1050 first IVF/ICSI cycles.促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂方案与GnRH激动剂方案中严重卵巢过度刺激综合征的风险:一项纳入1050个首次体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期的随机对照试验
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jun;31(6):1253-64. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew051. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
8
GnRH agonist-only trigger, compared to dual trigger, reduces oocyte retrieval rate in high responders without affecting cumulative live birth rate.仅使用 GnRH 激动剂触发,与双重触发相比,在不影响累积活产率的情况下,降低了高反应者的卵母细胞回收率。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 20;15:1461317. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1461317. eCollection 2024.
9
The addition of anti-Müllerian hormone in an algorithm for individualized hormone dosage did not improve the prediction of ovarian response-a randomized, controlled trial.抗苗勒管激素在个体化激素剂量算法中的添加并未改善卵巢反应的预测-一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):811-819. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex012.
10
Does the "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improve the pregnancy outcome in Bologna poor responders? a randomized clinical trial.“推迟启动”方案联合促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂是否能改善博洛尼亚反应不良者的妊娠结局?一项随机临床试验。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Dec 28;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0442-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Originator Follitropin Alfa and Follitropin Alfa Biosimilars in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study.在真实世界临床实践中接受原研促卵泡素α和促卵泡素α生物类似药治疗的患者的临床结局:一项回顾性研究
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;16(2):148-155. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_37_23. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
2
Corifollitropin Alfa for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies: State of the Art.戈那瑞林在辅助生殖技术中控制性卵巢刺激的应用:现状。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;45(1):43-48. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759631. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
3
Effect of rLH Supplementation during Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: Evidence from a Retrospective Analysis of 1470 Poor/Suboptimal/Normal Responders Receiving Either rFSH plus rLH or rFSH Alone.在体外受精控制性卵巢刺激过程中补充重组促黄体生成素的效果:来自对1470名接受重组促卵泡素加重组促黄体生成素或仅接受重组促卵泡素的低反应/反应欠佳/正常反应者的回顾性分析的证据。
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 13;11(6):1575. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061575.
4
Corifollitropin alpha, clomiphene citrate and dydrogesterone without daily gonadotrophin: a new option of a friendly protocol for high-responder oocyte donors.果纳芬、枸橼酸氯米酚和地屈孕酮而无需每日给予促性腺激素:一种适用于高反应性卵子供者的友好方案的新选择。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022 Apr 17;26(2):315-320. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210082.
5
Effect of a Combination of Myo-Inositol, Alpha-Lipoic Acid, and Folic Acid on Oocyte Morphology and Embryo Morphokinetics in non-PCOS Overweight/Obese Patients Undergoing IVF: A Pilot, Prospective, Randomized Study.肌醇、α-硫辛酸和叶酸联合应用对接受体外受精的非多囊卵巢综合征超重/肥胖患者卵母细胞形态和胚胎发育动力学的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 12;9(9):2949. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092949.
6
Human Recombinant FSH and Its Biosimilars: Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization.重组人促卵泡激素及其生物类似药:体外受精控制性卵巢刺激中的临床疗效、安全性及成本效益
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Jun 27;13(7):136. doi: 10.3390/ph13070136.

本文引用的文献

1
Corifollitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Corifollitropin alfa 用于体外受精中的卵巢刺激:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2019 Apr;111(4):722-733. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.047.
2
Association of progesterone production with serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels in assisted reproductive technology cycles with corifollitropin alfa.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案中血清抗苗勒管激素水平与孕酮生成的相关性。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0206111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206111. eCollection 2018.
3
Ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase: systematic review and meta-analysis.黄体期卵巢刺激:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Aug;33(8):971-80. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0721-5. Epub 2016 May 4.
4
Large randomized trial comparing transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer with a technique based on uterine length measurement before embryo transfer.一项大型随机试验,比较经腹超声引导下胚胎移植与基于胚胎移植前子宫长度测量的技术。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):289-95. doi: 10.1002/uog.15899.
5
Corifollitropin alfa compared to daily FSH in controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.在体外受精的控制性卵巢刺激中,与每日注射促卵泡生成素相比,注射聚乙二醇化重组促卵泡生成素α的荟萃分析。
J Ovarian Res. 2015 Jun 3;8:33. doi: 10.1186/s13048-015-0160-4.
6
Efficacy and safety of late-start Corifollitropin-alfa administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF: a cohort, case-control study.晚期启动注射用重组促卵泡素α在体外受精控制性卵巢刺激中的疗效及安全性:一项队列病例对照研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Mar;32(3):429-34. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0426-6. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
7
Administration of corifollitropin alfa on Day 2 versus Day 4 of the cycle in a GnRH antagonist protocol: a randomized controlled pilot study.在 GnRH 拮抗剂方案中,于周期第 2 天或第 4 天给予促卵泡素α:一项随机对照的初步研究。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jul;29(7):1500-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu105. Epub 2014 May 9.
8
Addition of highly purified HMG after corifollitropin alfa in antagonist-treated poor ovarian responders: a pilot study.在拮抗剂处理的卵巢反应不良者中添加高纯度 HMG 后加用果纳芬:一项初步研究。
Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1254-60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det045. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9
Polarized light microscopy-detectable structures of human oocytes and embryos are related to the likelihood of conception in IVF.偏振光显微镜可检测到的人类卵母细胞和胚胎结构与体外受精(IVF)中受孕的可能性相关。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Oct;29(10):1117-22. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9840-9. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
10
Pharmacokinetics and follicular dynamics of corifollitropin alfa versus recombinant FSH during ovarian stimulation for IVF.Corifollitropin Alfa 与重组 FSH 在 IVF 卵巢刺激中药代动力学和卵泡动力学比较。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Nov;21(5):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.032. Epub 2010 Jun 30.