Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 20;15:1461317. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1461317. eCollection 2024.
This study compared, in high responders undergoing IVF treatment, GnRH agonist-only trigger and dual trigger on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative live birth rate (LBR). The aim was to determine if the GnRH agonist-only triggers had provided outcomes comparable to dual trigger, while minimizing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).
A retrospective, matched case-control study was conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, including women who underwent IVF/ICSI between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. Inclusion criteria were: GnRH antagonist protocol and estrogen level >3,000 pg/ml on trigger day. Exclusion criteria were: immune/metabolic diseases, donated oocytes, and mixed stimulation cycles. Propensity score matching was applied to balance age, AMH level, and oocyte number between the GnRH agonist-only and dual trigger groups. Outcomes were analyzed for patients who had complete treatment cycles, focusing on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative LBR.
We analyzed 116 cycles in the agonist-only group, and 232 cycles in the dual trigger group. No inter-group difference was found in their age, BMI, and AMH levels. The dual trigger group had a higher oocyte retrieval rate (93% vs. 80%; p <0.05), while fertilization rates, blastocyst formation rates, and cumulative LBR were comparable. Notably, no OHSS cases had been reported in the GnRH agonist-only group, compared with 7 cases in the dual trigger group.
GnRH agonist-only triggers resulted in a lower oocyte retrieval rate compared to dual triggers but did not significantly affect cumulative LBR in high responders. This approach effectively reduces OHSS risk without compromising pregnancy outcomes, making it a preferable option in freeze-all strategies, despite a longer oocyte pick-up duration and a medium cost. GnRH agonist-only trigger, however, may not be suitable for fresh embryo transfers or patients with low serum LH levels on trigger day.
本研究比较了在接受 IVF 治疗的高反应者中,GnRH 激动剂单独触发和双重触发对卵母细胞回收率和累积活产率(LBR)的影响。目的是确定 GnRH 激动剂单独触发是否提供了与双重触发相当的结果,同时最大限度地降低卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的风险。
这是一项在台湾台中荣民总医院进行的回顾性、匹配病例对照研究,纳入了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 IVF/ICSI 的女性。纳入标准为: GnRH 拮抗剂方案和触发日雌二醇水平>3000 pg/ml。排除标准为:免疫/代谢疾病、捐赠卵子和混合刺激周期。应用倾向评分匹配来平衡 GnRH 激动剂单独触发组和双重触发组之间的年龄、AMH 水平和卵母细胞数量。分析了有完整治疗周期的患者的结果,重点关注卵母细胞回收率和累积 LBR。
我们分析了 GnRH 激动剂单独触发组的 116 个周期和双重触发组的 232 个周期。两组在年龄、BMI 和 AMH 水平方面无组间差异。双重触发组的卵母细胞回收率更高(93%对 80%;p<0.05),而受精率、囊胚形成率和累积 LBR 相当。值得注意的是,GnRH 激动剂单独触发组未报告 OHSS 病例,而双重触发组报告了 7 例。
与双重触发相比,GnRH 激动剂单独触发导致卵母细胞回收率较低,但在高反应者中对累积 LBR 没有显著影响。这种方法在不影响妊娠结局的情况下有效降低了 OHSS 的风险,成为冷冻所有策略的首选方案,尽管取卵时间较长且成本中等。然而,GnRH 激动剂单独触发可能不适合新鲜胚胎移植或触发日血清 LH 水平较低的患者。