• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰语和英语手部动作动词的使用规范:来自模仿任务的内隐测量。

Hand-use norms for Dutch and English manual action verbs: Implicit measures from a pantomime task.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2020 Aug;52(4):1744-1767. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01347-x.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-020-01347-x
PMID:32185639
Abstract

Many studies use manual action verbs to test whether people use neural systems for controlling manual actions to understand language about those actions. Yet, few of these studies empirically establish how people use their hands to perform the actions described by those verbs, relying instead on explicit self-report measures. Here, participants pantomimed the manual actions described by a large set of Dutch (N = 251) and English (N = 250) verbs, allowing us to approximate the extent to which people use each of their hands to perform these actions. After the pantomime task, participants also provided explicit ratings of each of these actions. The results from the pantomime task showed that most manual actions cannot be described accurately as either "unimanual" or "bimanual." With a few exceptions, unimanual action verbs do not describe actions that are performed with only one hand, and bimanual verbs do not describe actions that are performed by using both hands equally. Instead, individual actions vary continuously in the extent to which people use their non-dominant hand to perform them, and in the extent to which people consistently prefer one hand or the other to perform them. Finally, by comparing participants' implicit behavior to their explicit ratings, we found that participants' self-report showed only limited correspondence with their observed motor behavior. We provide all of our measures in both raw and summary format, offering researchers a precision tool for constructing stimulus sets for experiments on embodied cognition.

摘要

许多研究使用手动动作动词来测试人们是否使用控制手动动作的神经系统来理解有关这些动作的语言。然而,这些研究中很少有通过实证来确定人们如何用手来执行这些动词所描述的动作,而是依赖于明确的自我报告测量。在这里,参与者用手模仿了一组荷兰语(N=251)和英语(N=250)动词所描述的手动动作,使我们能够近似地确定人们用每只手执行这些动作的程度。在模仿任务之后,参与者还对这些动作中的每一个进行了明确的评分。模仿任务的结果表明,大多数手动动作不能准确地描述为“单手”或“双手”。除了少数例外,单手动作动词不能描述只用一只手执行的动作,而双手动词不能描述用双手均等执行的动作。相反,个别动作在人们用非主导手执行动作的程度以及人们一贯偏爱一只手或另一只手执行动作的程度上存在连续变化。最后,通过比较参与者的内隐行为和他们的外显评分,我们发现参与者的自我报告仅与他们观察到的运动行为有一定的对应关系。我们以原始和汇总格式提供了我们的所有测量结果,为研究人员提供了一种用于构建具身认知实验刺激集的精确工具。

相似文献

1
Hand-use norms for Dutch and English manual action verbs: Implicit measures from a pantomime task.荷兰语和英语手部动作动词的使用规范:来自模仿任务的内隐测量。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Aug;52(4):1744-1767. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01347-x.
2
Neural dissociations between action verb understanding and motor imagery.动作动词理解和运动意象的神经分离。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Oct;22(10):2387-400. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21386.
3
The Embodied Penman: Effector-Specific Motor-Language Integration During Handwriting.具身书写者:手写过程中特定效应器的运动-语言整合
Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;43(7):e12767. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12767.
4
The embodied typist: Bimanual actions are modulated by words' implied motility and number of evoked limbs.具身打字员:双手动作会受到单词所暗示的运动性和所唤起的肢体数量的调节。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 10;18(8):e0289926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289926. eCollection 2023.
5
What matters is the underlying experience: Similar motor responses during processing observed hand actions and hand-related verbs.重要的是潜在的体验:在处理观察到的手部动作和与手相关的动词时,存在相似的运动反应。
J Neuropsychol. 2022 Jun;16(2):389-406. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12270. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
6
Language-motor interference reflected in MEG beta oscillations.语言-运动干扰反映在 MEG β振荡中。
Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 1;109:438-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.077. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
7
Hands typing what hands do: Action-semantic integration dynamics throughout written verb production.手部进行手部的动作:书面动词生成过程中的动作语义整合动态。
Cognition. 2016 Apr;149:56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Effect of Constrained Arm Posture on the Processing of Action Verbs.受限手臂姿势对动作动词加工的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2017 Feb 10;11:57. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00057. eCollection 2017.
9
Virtual action and real action have different impacts on comprehension of concrete verbs.虚拟动作和真实动作对具体动词理解的影响不同。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 24;6:176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00176. eCollection 2015.
10
A functional role for the motor system in language understanding: evidence from theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation.运动系统在语言理解中的功能作用:来自 theta 爆发经颅磁刺激的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):849-54. doi: 10.1177/0956797611412387. Epub 2011 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The experiential basis of compatibility effects in reading-by-rotating paradigms.旋转阅读范式中兼容性效应的经验基础。
Psychol Res. 2023 Feb;87(1):124-136. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01663-1. Epub 2022 Feb 27.