Suppr超能文献

成人单纯性急性下呼吸道感染的中成药随机对照试验证据基础及指南推荐

Evidence base of randomized controlled trials and guideline recommendations of patent Traditional Chinese Medicines for uncomplicated acute lower respiratory tract infections in adults.

作者信息

Xia Ruyu, Wang Di, Wang Ying, Liu Jianping, Li Xun, Hu Ruixue, Wen Lingzi, Fei Yutong, Hu Xiaoyang, Merlin Willcox, Michael Moore, Andrew Flower, Lily Lai, Zhang Lishan, Wang Qi

机构信息

Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.

Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.

出版信息

J Tradit Chin Med. 2018 Aug;38(4):490-503.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical practice guideline recommendations on the use of oral patent Traditional Chinese Medicines (PTCMs) for uncomplicated acute lower respiratory tract infections (ALRTIs) in adults with the existing evidence using results of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A systematic review on RCTs and a systematic review of current guidelines on orally taken PTCMs for uncomplicated ALRTIs were performed. PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and four Chinese databases were searched from inception to September 2016 for RCTs testing orally taken PTCMs for uncomplicated ALRTIs (excluding pneumonia). Two reviewers independently screened each study, extracted study data, and assessed risk of bias. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or by consultation with a third reviewer. Clinical practice guidelines for uncomplicated ALRTIs containing PTCM recommendations were identified and quality appraised. The quality of pooled evidence of the RCTs and the guidelines was assessed with GRADE and AGREE respectively. The consistency of the evidence base in RCTs and the guideline recommendations were then compared.

RESULTS

For the systematic review of RCTs, 4810 papers were identified, among which 29 RCTs (5093 patients) were included in the review. PTCMs compared to placebo increased the effective treatment rate of cough (3 trials, 949 patients, risk ratio (RR) 2.50, 1.16 to 5.43; low certainty); improved assessment of global health (3 trials, 948 patients, RR 1.70, 1.44 to 2.01; low certainty); and increased the effective rate of specific symptom relief (1 trial, 478 patients, RR 4.01, 2.76 to 5.81; moderate certainty). 21 trials (3432 patients) compared effects of different PTCMs. For the guideline evaluation, 29 PTCMs were recommended for the use of uncomplicated ALRTIs, of which27 had no supportive evidence from RCTs.

CONCLUSION

The evidence base of PTCMs for uncomplicated ALRTIs is weak and the guideline recommendations were based on almost no clinical trial evidence. Rigorous clinical research is urgently needed to inform the clinical use of these herbal medicines. Further training in evidence-based medicine methods for Traditional Chinese Medicine guideline developers is essential.

摘要

目的

运用随机对照试验(RCT)系统评价结果,比较关于成人单纯性急性下呼吸道感染(ALRTIs)使用口服专利中药(PTCMs)的临床实践指南推荐与现有证据。

方法

对RCT进行系统评价,并对当前关于口服PTCMs治疗单纯性ALRTIs的指南进行系统评价。从建库至2016年9月,检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE和四个中文数据库,查找测试口服PTCMs治疗单纯性ALRTIs(不包括肺炎)的RCT。两名评价员独立筛选每项研究,提取研究数据,并评估偏倚风险。分歧通过讨论或与第三位评价员协商解决。识别并对含有PTCM推荐的单纯性ALRTIs临床实践指南进行质量评价。分别用GRADE和AGREE评估RCT和指南汇总证据的质量。然后比较RCT证据基础与指南推荐的一致性。

结果

对于RCT的系统评价,共识别出4810篇论文,其中29项RCT(5093例患者)纳入评价。与安慰剂相比,PTCMs提高了咳嗽有效治疗率(3项试验,949例患者,风险比(RR)2.50,1.16至5.43;低确定性);改善了整体健康评估(3项试验,948例患者,RR 1.70,1.44至2.01;低确定性);提高了特定症状缓解有效率(1项试验,478例患者,RR 4.01,2.76至5.81;中等确定性)。21项试验(3432例患者)比较了不同PTCMs的效果。对于指南评价,推荐29种PTCMs用于单纯性ALRTIs,其中27种没有RCT的支持证据。

结论

PTCMs用于单纯性ALRTIs的证据基础薄弱,指南推荐几乎没有临床试验证据支持。迫切需要进行严谨的临床研究,为这些草药的临床应用提供依据。对中医指南制定者进行循证医学方法的进一步培训至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验