University of Minnesota.
Cornell University.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Aug 1;45(4):581-593. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8255505.
The passage and initial implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) were imperiled by partisan divisions, court challenges, and the quagmire of federalism. In the aftermath of Republican efforts to repeal the ACA, however, the law not only carries on but also is changing the nature of political debate as its benefits are facilitating increased support for it, creating new constituents who rely on its benefits and share intense attachments to them, and lifting the confidence of Americans in both their individual competence to participate effectively in politics and that government will respond. Critics from the Left and the Right differ on their favored remedy, but both have failed to appreciate the qualitative shifts brought on by the ACA; this myopia results from viewing reform as a fixed endpoint instead of a process of evolution over time. The result is that conservatives have been blind to the widening network of support for the ACA, while those on the left have underestimated health reform's impact in broadening recognition of medical care as a right of citizenship instead of a privilege earned in the workplace. The forces that constrained the ACA's development still rage in American politics, but they no longer dictate its survival as they did during its passage in 2010.
平价医疗法案(ACA)的通过和初步实施受到党派分歧、法庭质疑和联邦主义困境的威胁。然而,在共和党努力废除 ACA 之后,该法案不仅得以继续实施,而且还改变了政治辩论的性质,因为其福利促进了对该法案的更多支持,创造了依赖其福利并对其产生强烈依恋的新选民,并增强了美国人对个人有效参与政治的能力和政府会做出回应的信心。来自左派和右派的批评者对他们青睐的补救措施存在分歧,但双方都没有意识到 ACA 带来的定性转变;这种短视源于将改革视为一个固定的终点,而不是一个随着时间的推移而演变的过程。结果是,保守派对 ACA 日益扩大的支持网络视而不见,而左派则低估了医疗改革在扩大对医疗保健作为公民权利的认识方面的影响,而不是在工作场所获得的特权。在美国政治中,限制 ACA 发展的力量仍然很强烈,但它们不再像在 2010 年通过该法案时那样决定其生存。