Suppr超能文献

在加利福尼亚州的住宅物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗计划中实施无烟区。

Tobacco-free grounds implementation in California residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs.

机构信息

Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Addict Dis. 2020 Jan-Mar;38(1):55-63. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1713687. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

Abstract

Smoke-free laws and policies have contributed significantly to the decline in smoking in the U.S, but are not often applied in high-prevalence smoking populations where they are most needed. Smoking among clients in publicly funded substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is 3-4 times higher than the general population, and little is known about tobacco policies programs have adopted. To identify the prevalence of tobacco-free grounds and other smoking policies in California's publicly funded, adult, residential SUD programs. Using a California DHCS contact list of 1,921 publicly funded, non-medical, SUD programs, 362 were eligible to participate in a brief semi-structured phone survey concerning indoor and outdoor smoking for staff and clients and other tobacco policies. Of 259 programs that completed the survey, 28 (10.8%) reported tobacco-free grounds. 91 (35.1%) expressed interest in implementing tobacco-free policies and 23 have plans to do so. Nearly all programs (n = 253, 97.7%) had some policy restricting e-cigarette use, and 110 (43.5%) of these reported a complete ban on e-cigarette use. 124 (47.9%) had policies prohibiting staff and clients smoking together. Most California residential SUD programs allow outdoor smoking for staff and clients and few have adopted tobacco-free grounds policies. Given the reported interest in adopting tobacco-free policies, the high density of smokers in the SUD population, and the association of tobacco-free policies with lower client and staff smoking rates, state licensing and regulatory agencies, as well as county health departments, should work with SUD programs to adopt tobacco-free policies.

摘要

无烟法律和政策极大地促进了美国的吸烟率下降,但在最需要这些法律和政策的高吸烟率人群中,它们并不经常得到实施。在公共资助的物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗中,客户吸烟率是普通人群的 3-4 倍,而对于这些人群中已经采用的烟草政策项目,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在确定加利福尼亚州公共资助的成人住院 SUD 项目中是否存在无烟场所和其他吸烟政策。使用加利福尼亚州 DHCS 的 1921 个公共资助的非医疗 SUD 项目联系人名单,有 362 个项目有资格参与一项关于员工和客户室内外吸烟情况以及其他烟草政策的简短半结构式电话调查。在完成调查的 259 个项目中,有 28 个(10.8%)报告了无烟场所。91 个(35.1%)表示有兴趣实施无烟政策,其中 23 个有实施计划。几乎所有的项目(n=253,97.7%)都有一些限制电子烟使用的政策,其中 110 个(43.5%)报告完全禁止使用电子烟。124 个(47.9%)有禁止员工和客户一起吸烟的政策。大多数加利福尼亚州住院 SUD 项目允许员工和客户在户外吸烟,很少有项目采用无烟场所政策。鉴于报告的实施无烟政策的兴趣、SUD 人群中吸烟者的高密度以及无烟政策与较低的客户和员工吸烟率之间的关联,州许可和监管机构以及县卫生部门应与 SUD 项目合作,实施无烟政策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验