• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在加利福尼亚州的住宅物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗计划中实施无烟区。

Tobacco-free grounds implementation in California residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs.

机构信息

Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Addict Dis. 2020 Jan-Mar;38(1):55-63. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1713687. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1080/10550887.2020.1713687
PMID:32186480
Abstract

Smoke-free laws and policies have contributed significantly to the decline in smoking in the U.S, but are not often applied in high-prevalence smoking populations where they are most needed. Smoking among clients in publicly funded substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is 3-4 times higher than the general population, and little is known about tobacco policies programs have adopted. To identify the prevalence of tobacco-free grounds and other smoking policies in California's publicly funded, adult, residential SUD programs. Using a California DHCS contact list of 1,921 publicly funded, non-medical, SUD programs, 362 were eligible to participate in a brief semi-structured phone survey concerning indoor and outdoor smoking for staff and clients and other tobacco policies. Of 259 programs that completed the survey, 28 (10.8%) reported tobacco-free grounds. 91 (35.1%) expressed interest in implementing tobacco-free policies and 23 have plans to do so. Nearly all programs (n = 253, 97.7%) had some policy restricting e-cigarette use, and 110 (43.5%) of these reported a complete ban on e-cigarette use. 124 (47.9%) had policies prohibiting staff and clients smoking together. Most California residential SUD programs allow outdoor smoking for staff and clients and few have adopted tobacco-free grounds policies. Given the reported interest in adopting tobacco-free policies, the high density of smokers in the SUD population, and the association of tobacco-free policies with lower client and staff smoking rates, state licensing and regulatory agencies, as well as county health departments, should work with SUD programs to adopt tobacco-free policies.

摘要

无烟法律和政策极大地促进了美国的吸烟率下降,但在最需要这些法律和政策的高吸烟率人群中,它们并不经常得到实施。在公共资助的物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗中,客户吸烟率是普通人群的 3-4 倍,而对于这些人群中已经采用的烟草政策项目,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在确定加利福尼亚州公共资助的成人住院 SUD 项目中是否存在无烟场所和其他吸烟政策。使用加利福尼亚州 DHCS 的 1921 个公共资助的非医疗 SUD 项目联系人名单,有 362 个项目有资格参与一项关于员工和客户室内外吸烟情况以及其他烟草政策的简短半结构式电话调查。在完成调查的 259 个项目中,有 28 个(10.8%)报告了无烟场所。91 个(35.1%)表示有兴趣实施无烟政策,其中 23 个有实施计划。几乎所有的项目(n=253,97.7%)都有一些限制电子烟使用的政策,其中 110 个(43.5%)报告完全禁止使用电子烟。124 个(47.9%)有禁止员工和客户一起吸烟的政策。大多数加利福尼亚州住院 SUD 项目允许员工和客户在户外吸烟,很少有项目采用无烟场所政策。鉴于报告的实施无烟政策的兴趣、SUD 人群中吸烟者的高密度以及无烟政策与较低的客户和员工吸烟率之间的关联,州许可和监管机构以及县卫生部门应与 SUD 项目合作,实施无烟政策。

相似文献

1
Tobacco-free grounds implementation in California residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs.在加利福尼亚州的住宅物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗计划中实施无烟区。
J Addict Dis. 2020 Jan-Mar;38(1):55-63. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1713687. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
2
Smoking related outcomes before and after implementation of tobacco-free grounds in residential substance use disorder treatment programs.在住宅物质使用障碍治疗计划中实施禁烟区前后与吸烟相关的结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Apr 1;197:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
3
Smoking and Tobacco-Free Policies in Women's Residential Substance Use Disorder Treatment Facilities: A Community-Engaged Approach.妇女戒毒治疗机构中的吸烟和禁烟政策:一种社区参与的方法。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Sep 25;20(11):1386-1392. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx211.
4
Tobacco use among substance use disorder (SUD) treatment staff is associated with tobacco-related services received by clients.物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗工作人员中的烟草使用与客户接受的烟草相关服务有关。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Jan;132:108496. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108496. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
5
Pre-implementation Assessment of Tobacco Cessation Interventions in Substance Use Disorder Residential Programs in California.加利福尼亚州物质使用障碍住院治疗项目中戒烟干预措施的实施前评估。
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(9):1345-1355. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2079139. Epub 2022 May 27.
6
Implementing tobacco-free policy in residential substance use disorders treatment: Practice changes among staff.在住院物质使用障碍治疗中实施无烟政策:工作人员的实践变化
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Feb 22;2:100033. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100033. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Barriers and Facilitators to Tobacco Cessation in a Nationwide Sample of Addiction Treatment Programs.全国成瘾治疗项目样本中戒烟的障碍与促进因素
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Aug;67:22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 5.
8
Policy and Practice Changes Associated with a Tobacco-Free Initiative in Residential Substance Use Disorder Treatment.与住宅性物质使用障碍治疗中的无烟倡议相关的政策与实践变革
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2024 Feb 16:1-10. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2024.2316278.
9
Tobacco use and tobacco services in California substance use treatment programs.加利福尼亚州物质使用治疗计划中的烟草使用和烟草服务。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Sep 1;214:108173. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108173. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
10
Smoking Policies of Outpatient and Residential Substance Use Disorder Treatment Facilities in the United States.美国门诊及住院物质使用障碍治疗机构的吸烟政策
Tob Use Insights. 2024 May 14;17:1179173X241254803. doi: 10.1177/1179173X241254803. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinician's perceptions and experiences with tobacco treatment in people who use cannabis: a qualitative study.临床医生对使用大麻者进行烟草治疗的看法和经验:一项定性研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2025 Jan 21;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13011-024-00632-8.
2
A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment.一项针对简短多组分干预措施的群组随机试验,以改善物质使用治疗中的烟草使用结局。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Jun 16;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00539-w.
3
Reducing tobacco use in substance use treatment: An intervention to promote tobacco-free grounds.
减少物质使用治疗中的烟草使用:促进无烟场所的干预措施。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Apr;135:108640. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108640. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
4
Factors associated with dual and polytobacco use among people in residential substance use disorder treatment.居住性物质使用障碍治疗人群中与双重及多种烟草使用相关的因素。
Am J Addict. 2021 Sep;30(5):496-504. doi: 10.1111/ajad.13206. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
5
Organizational-Level Moderators Impacting Tobacco-Related Knowledge Change after Tobacco Education Training in Substance Use Treatment Centers.组织层面的调节因素对物质使用治疗中心的烟草教育培训后与烟草相关的知识变化的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;18(14):7597. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147597.
6
Impacts of COVID-19 on residential treatment programs for substance use disorder.新冠疫情对物质使用障碍的住院治疗项目的影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Apr;123:108255. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108255. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
7
Tobacco use and tobacco services in California substance use treatment programs.加利福尼亚州物质使用治疗计划中的烟草使用和烟草服务。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Sep 1;214:108173. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108173. Epub 2020 Jul 11.