Suppr超能文献

西班牙二线治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症中芬戈莫德与那他珠单抗的疗效比较:二线 GATE 研究。

Effectiveness of Fingolimod versus Natalizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Spain: Second-Line GATE Study.

机构信息

Unidad de Esclerosis Múltiple, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario "Virgen de la Arrixaca" (IMIB-ARRIXACA), Murcia, Spain,

Cátedra de Neuroinmunología Clínica y Esclerosis Múltiple, UCAM, Universidad Católica San Antonio, Murcia, Spain,

出版信息

Eur Neurol. 2020;83(1):25-33. doi: 10.1159/000505778. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of fingolimod (FIN) and natalizumab (NTZ) as second-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

Multicenter, observational study, in which, information of 388 patients randomly selected and treated with FIN or NTZ in routine clinical practice was retrospectively collected with the main objective of comparing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) over the first year, after FIN or NTZ treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Mean ARR during the first year of treatment was 0.28 in FIN group and 0.12 in NTZ group (p = 0.0064); nevertheless, the difference between groups lost statistical significance when the propensity score analysis was performed. Time to disability -progression was similar in both treatment groups (12.3 ± 6.7 months in FIN, and 12.8 ± 0.1 months in NTZ; p = 0.4654). Treatment persistence after the first year of treatment was higher in patients treated with FIN (95%) than in those treated with NTZ (84%; p = 0.0014).

CONCLUSIONS

After 12 months of treatment, both FIN and NTZ reduced the ARR, but ARR percent reduction was significantly higher with NTZ. Treatment persistence was higher in patients receiving FIN.

摘要

背景

目前缺乏头对头研究比较芬戈莫德(FIN)和那他珠单抗(NTZ)作为复发缓解型多发性硬化(RRMS)二线治疗的疗效。

方法

多中心、观察性研究,回顾性收集了 388 例随机接受 FIN 或 NTZ 治疗的患者信息,主要目的是比较 FIN 或 NTZ 治疗起始后第一年的年复发率(ARR)。

结果

FIN 组第一年的平均 ARR 为 0.28,NTZ 组为 0.12(p=0.0064);然而,当进行倾向评分分析时,两组间的差异失去了统计学意义。两组间残疾进展时间相似(FIN 组为 12.3±6.7 个月,NTZ 组为 12.8±0.1 个月;p=0.4654)。第一年治疗后治疗的持续时间在 FIN 治疗组(95%)高于 NTZ 治疗组(84%;p=0.0014)。

结论

治疗 12 个月后,FIN 和 NTZ 均降低了 ARR,但 NTZ 的 ARR 降低百分比显著更高。接受 FIN 治疗的患者治疗持续时间更高。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Definition, prevalence and predictive factors of benign multiple sclerosis.良性多发性硬化的定义、患病率及预测因素
eNeurologicalSci. 2017 May 13;7:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2017.05.002. eCollection 2017 Jun.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验