Unidad de Esclerosis Múltiple, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario "Virgen de la Arrixaca" (IMIB-ARRIXACA), Murcia, Spain,
Cátedra de Neuroinmunología Clínica y Esclerosis Múltiple, UCAM, Universidad Católica San Antonio, Murcia, Spain,
Eur Neurol. 2020;83(1):25-33. doi: 10.1159/000505778. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
There is a lack of head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of fingolimod (FIN) and natalizumab (NTZ) as second-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
Multicenter, observational study, in which, information of 388 patients randomly selected and treated with FIN or NTZ in routine clinical practice was retrospectively collected with the main objective of comparing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) over the first year, after FIN or NTZ treatment initiation.
Mean ARR during the first year of treatment was 0.28 in FIN group and 0.12 in NTZ group (p = 0.0064); nevertheless, the difference between groups lost statistical significance when the propensity score analysis was performed. Time to disability -progression was similar in both treatment groups (12.3 ± 6.7 months in FIN, and 12.8 ± 0.1 months in NTZ; p = 0.4654). Treatment persistence after the first year of treatment was higher in patients treated with FIN (95%) than in those treated with NTZ (84%; p = 0.0014).
After 12 months of treatment, both FIN and NTZ reduced the ARR, but ARR percent reduction was significantly higher with NTZ. Treatment persistence was higher in patients receiving FIN.
目前缺乏头对头研究比较芬戈莫德(FIN)和那他珠单抗(NTZ)作为复发缓解型多发性硬化(RRMS)二线治疗的疗效。
多中心、观察性研究,回顾性收集了 388 例随机接受 FIN 或 NTZ 治疗的患者信息,主要目的是比较 FIN 或 NTZ 治疗起始后第一年的年复发率(ARR)。
FIN 组第一年的平均 ARR 为 0.28,NTZ 组为 0.12(p=0.0064);然而,当进行倾向评分分析时,两组间的差异失去了统计学意义。两组间残疾进展时间相似(FIN 组为 12.3±6.7 个月,NTZ 组为 12.8±0.1 个月;p=0.4654)。第一年治疗后治疗的持续时间在 FIN 治疗组(95%)高于 NTZ 治疗组(84%;p=0.0014)。
治疗 12 个月后,FIN 和 NTZ 均降低了 ARR,但 NTZ 的 ARR 降低百分比显著更高。接受 FIN 治疗的患者治疗持续时间更高。