• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Modified Rio Score with Platform Therapy Predicts Treatment Success with Fingolimod and Natalizumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients.改良里约评分联合平台治疗可预测复发缓解型多发性硬化患者使用芬戈莫德和那他珠单抗的治疗效果。
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 22;10(9):1830. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091830.
2
Long-term evaluation of NEDA-3 status in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients after switching from natalizumab to fingolimod.从那他珠单抗转换为芬戈莫德后复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的无疾病活动状态3(NEDA-3)的长期评估
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018 Aug 9;11:1756286418791103. doi: 10.1177/1756286418791103. eCollection 2018.
3
Long-term comparative analysis of no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) status between multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab and fingolimod for up to 4 years.长达 4 年的时间里,接受那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德治疗的多发性硬化症患者无疾病活动(NEDA-3)状态的长期对比分析。
Neurol Sci. 2021 Nov;42(11):4647-4655. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05127-z. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
4
NEDA-3 status including cortical lesions in the comparative evaluation of natalizumab fingolimod efficacy in multiple sclerosis.在多发性硬化症中,那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德疗效的比较评估中,包括皮质病变的无疾病活动证据-3状态。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018 Oct 25;11:1756286418805713. doi: 10.1177/1756286418805713. eCollection 2018.
5
Natalizumab versus fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis non-responding to first-line injectable therapies.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗一线注射治疗应答不佳的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的疗效比较。
Mult Scler. 2016 Sep;22(10):1315-26. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650736. Epub 2016 May 26.
6
The real-world effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. An Italian multicentre study.那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的真实世界疗效。一项意大利多中心研究。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Aug;33:146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.05.026. Epub 2019 May 31.
7
Effectiveness of fingolimod in real-world relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis Italian patients: the GENIUS study.芬戈莫德在意大利复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者真实世界中的疗效:GENIUS研究
Neurol Sci. 2020 Oct;41(10):2843-2851. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04380-y. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
8
Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.比较那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德作为复发缓解型多发性硬化二线治疗的疗效分析。
Mult Scler. 2018 May;24(6):777-785. doi: 10.1177/1352458518768433. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
9
Are natalizumab and fingolimod analogous second-line options for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis? A clinical practice observational study.那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德作为复发缓解型多发性硬化症的二线治疗选择是否类似?一项临床实践观察性研究。
Eur Neurol. 2014;72(3-4):173-80. doi: 10.1159/000361044. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
10
Fingolimod versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study in Iran.芬戈莫德与那他珠单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的比较:伊朗的成本效益和成本效用研究
J Med Econ. 2019 Apr;22(4):297-305. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1560750. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Refining Prognostic Factors in Adult-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review of Current Insights.成人多发性硬化症预后因素的细化:当前见解的叙述性综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 11;26(16):7756. doi: 10.3390/ijms26167756.
2
Early clinical effect of cladribine in patients with highly active multiple sclerosis in Mexico.克拉屈滨在墨西哥高度活动性多发性硬化症患者中的早期临床疗效。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2024 Aug 1;10(3):20552173241260156. doi: 10.1177/20552173241260156. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
3
Treatment algorithms of relapsing multiple sclerosis: an exploration based on the available disease-modifying therapies in China.复发型多发性硬化的治疗方案:基于中国现有疾病修正治疗的探索
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024 Apr 13;17:17562864241239117. doi: 10.1177/17562864241239117. eCollection 2024.
4
Holistic, Long-Term Management of People with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis with Cladribine Tablets: Expert Opinion from France.用克拉屈滨片对复发型多发性硬化症患者进行全面、长期管理:来自法国的专家意见。
Neurol Ther. 2024 Jun;13(3):503-518. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00589-7. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
Iranian specialists' approach to treatment escalation in multiple sclerosis patients with cognitive impairment.伊朗专家对认知障碍多发性硬化症患者治疗升级的处理方法。
Curr J Neurol. 2023 Jan 5;22(1):1-7. doi: 10.18502/cjn.v22i1.12610.
6
Treatment Courses of Patients Newly Diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis in 2012-2018.2012 - 2018年新诊断多发性硬化症患者的治疗疗程
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 11;12(2):595. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020595.
7
The safety and efficacy of fingolimod: Real-world data from a long-term, non-interventional study on the treatment of RRMS patients spanning up to 5 years from Hungary.芬戈莫德的安全性和疗效:来自匈牙利长达 5 年的真实世界、非干预性研究的长期数据,该研究涉及 RRMS 患者的治疗。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 22;17(4):e0267346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267346. eCollection 2022.
8
Long-Term Efficacy Outcomes of Natalizumab vs. Fingolimod in Patients With Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Real-World Data From a Multiple Sclerosis Reference Center.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗高度活动性复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的长期疗效结果:来自一个多发性硬化症参考中心的真实世界数据
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 23;12:699844. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.699844. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Fingolimod versus Natalizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Spain: Second-Line GATE Study.西班牙二线治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症中芬戈莫德与那他珠单抗的疗效比较:二线 GATE 研究。
Eur Neurol. 2020;83(1):25-33. doi: 10.1159/000505778. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
2
Minimal evidence of disease activity (MEDA) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症复发缓解型中疾病活动度的最低证据 (MEDA)。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;91(3):271-277. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322348. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
3
The effectiveness of interferon beta versus glatiramer acetate and natalizumab versus fingolimod in a Polish real-world population.波兰真实世界人群中干扰素β与那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德与加利昔单抗的疗效比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0223863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223863. eCollection 2019.
4
Effects of Natalizumab and Fingolimod on Clinical, Cognitive, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures in Multiple Sclerosis.那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德对多发性硬化症的临床、认知和磁共振成像指标的影响。
Neurotherapeutics. 2020 Jan;17(1):208-217. doi: 10.1007/s13311-019-00781-w.
5
The real-world effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. An Italian multicentre study.那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的真实世界疗效。一项意大利多中心研究。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Aug;33:146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.05.026. Epub 2019 May 31.
6
Comparing longitudinal brain atrophy measurement techniques in a real-world multiple sclerosis clinical practice cohort: towards clinical integration?在真实世界的多发性硬化症临床实践队列中比较纵向脑萎缩测量技术:迈向临床整合?
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2019 Jan 25;12:1756286418823462. doi: 10.1177/1756286418823462. eCollection 2019.
7
NEDA-3 status including cortical lesions in the comparative evaluation of natalizumab fingolimod efficacy in multiple sclerosis.在多发性硬化症中,那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德疗效的比较评估中,包括皮质病变的无疾病活动证据-3状态。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018 Oct 25;11:1756286418805713. doi: 10.1177/1756286418805713. eCollection 2018.
8
Drug-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in multiple sclerosis patients.多发性硬化症患者的药物相关性进行性多灶性白质脑病。
Mult Scler. 2019 Jul;25(8):1141-1149. doi: 10.1177/1352458518786075. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
The sequence of disease-modifying therapies in relapsing multiple sclerosis: safety and immunologic considerations.复发型多发性硬化症中疾病修正疗法的顺序:安全性和免疫学考虑。
J Neurol. 2017 Dec;264(12):2351-2374. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8594-9. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
10
Inflammatory Activity on Natalizumab Predicts Short-Term but Not Long-Term Disability in Multiple Sclerosis.那他珠单抗的炎症活性可预测多发性硬化症的短期而非长期残疾。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0169546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169546. eCollection 2017.

改良里约评分联合平台治疗可预测复发缓解型多发性硬化患者使用芬戈莫德和那他珠单抗的治疗效果。

Modified Rio Score with Platform Therapy Predicts Treatment Success with Fingolimod and Natalizumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

作者信息

Jamroz-Wiśniewska Anna, Zajdel Radosław, Słowik Agnieszka, Marona Monika, Wnuk Marcin, Adamczyk-Sowa Monika, Adamczyk Bożena, Lasek-Bal Anetta, Puz Przemysław, Stęposz Arkadiusz, Krzystanek Ewa, Patalong-Ogiewa Maja, Pokryszko-Dragan Anna, Budrewicz Sławomir, Koziarska Dorota, Karbicka Anna, Wawrzyniak Sławomir, Fryze Waldemar, Furtak-Niczyporuk Marzena, Rejdak Konrad

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8, 20-054 Lublin, Poland.

Chair of Informatics in Business, University of Lodz, Rewolucji 1905 Roku 37/39, 91-001 Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 22;10(9):1830. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091830.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10091830
PMID:33922368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8122749/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reliable markers of disease outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS) would help to predict the response to treatment in patients treated with high efficacy drugs. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) has become a treatment goal whereas the modified Rio score (MRS) predicts future suboptimal responders to treatment. The aim of our study was to identify factors that would predict poor response to treatment with natalizumab and fingolimod.

METHODS

In the multicenter prospective trial, 336 subjects were enrolled, initiating therapy with natalizumab ( = 135) or fingolimod ( = 201). Data on relapse rate, the expanded disability status scale, and MRI results were collected, and MRS was estimated.

RESULTS

NEDA-3 after the first year of therapy was 73.9% for natalizumab and 54.8% for fingolimod ( < 0.0001). Patients with MRS = 0 in the last year on platform therapy had the best NEDA-3 (71%) and patients with MRS = 3 had the worst NEDA-3 (41%) in the first year of treatment with the second-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that switching to the second-line therapy should occur earlier to enable better results for patients treated with natalizumab or fingolimod. The outcome on both drugs is better with better neurological conditions and lower MRS of the patient on the platform therapy.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化症(MS)疾病转归的可靠标志物有助于预测接受高效药物治疗患者的治疗反应。无疾病活动证据(NEDA)已成为一个治疗目标,而改良里约评分(MRS)可预测未来治疗反应欠佳的患者。我们研究的目的是确定可预测那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德治疗反应不佳的因素。

方法

在这项多中心前瞻性试验中,招募了336名受试者,开始使用那他珠单抗(n = 135)或芬戈莫德(n = 201)进行治疗。收集了复发率、扩展残疾状态量表和MRI结果的数据,并估算了MRS。

结果

治疗第一年的NEDA-3,那他珠单抗组为73.9%,芬戈莫德组为54.8%(P < 0.0001)。在二线治疗的第一年,平台治疗最后一年MRS = 0的患者NEDA-3最佳(71%),而MRS = 3的患者NEDA-3最差(41%)。

结论

我们得出结论,应更早地切换到二线治疗,以使接受那他珠单抗或芬戈莫德治疗的患者获得更好的结果。在平台治疗中,患者神经状况越好且MRS越低,两种药物的治疗效果越好。