• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针刺疗法与腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉对分娩疼痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of acupuncture versus spinal-epidural anesthesia on labor pain: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Wu Lingling, Yin Yuzhu, Sun Ke, Wu Ling, Hou Hongying, Liu Xiaohui, Yi Wei, Li Shangrong

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.

Department of Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Guangdong No. 2 Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510317, China.

出版信息

J Tradit Chin Med. 2017 Oct;37(5):629-635.

PMID:32188223
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture analgesia (AA) compared with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for labor pain relief and labor outcomes.

METHODS

We evaluated 131 primiparous women who received respiratory guidance during maternal uterine contractions and received either AA (n = 43), CSEA (n = 45), or no additional treatment (control, n = 43). The groups were compared regarding visual analog scale (VAS) scores for abdominal and back pain, and labor outcomes.

RESULTS

The abdominal VAS scores of the AA and CSEA groups were significantly lower than that of the control group. In addition, the VAS scores of the CSEA group were significantly lower than that of the AA group at 10 and 60 min after intervention. The back pain VAS scores of the AA and CSEA groups were significantly lower than that of the control group at 5, 10, and 60 min after intervention. The duration of the active phase of labor in the CSEA group was significantly longer than that of the AA and control groups. The rates of oxytocin use (4.70%), urinary retention (4.70%), and postpartum hemorrhage [(273.7 ± 53.6) mL] in the AA group were significantly lower than in the CSEA group [46.70%, 24.20%, and (320.0 ± 85.6) mL, respectively].

CONCLUSION

Both AA and CSEA were effective for labor pain relief, CSEA provided more effective pain relief, while AA was associated with a shorter duration of labor and fewer adverse effects.and each has its advantages and disadvantages.

摘要

目的

评估针刺镇痛(AA)与腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)用于缓解分娩疼痛及分娩结局的有效性。

方法

我们评估了131名初产妇,她们在产妇子宫收缩期间接受呼吸指导,并接受了AA(n = 43)、CSEA(n = 45)或不进行额外治疗(对照组,n = 43)。比较各组腹部和背部疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分以及分娩结局。

结果

AA组和CSEA组的腹部VAS评分显著低于对照组。此外,干预后10分钟和60分钟时,CSEA组的VAS评分显著低于AA组。干预后5分钟、10分钟和60分钟时,AA组和CSEA组的背部疼痛VAS评分显著低于对照组。CSEA组的活跃期分娩时间显著长于AA组和对照组。AA组的缩宫素使用率(4.70%)、尿潴留率(4.70%)和产后出血量[(273.7 ± 53.6)mL]显著低于CSEA组[分别为46.70%、24.20%和(320.0 ± 85.6)mL]。

结论

AA和CSEA均对缓解分娩疼痛有效,CSEA提供了更有效的疼痛缓解,而AA与更短的产程和更少的不良反应相关,且各有优缺点。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of acupuncture versus spinal-epidural anesthesia on labor pain: a randomized controlled trial.针刺疗法与腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉对分娩疼痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Tradit Chin Med. 2017 Oct;37(5):629-635.
2
Effects of electroacupuncture on reducing labor pain and complications in the labor analgesia process of combined spinal-epidural analgesia with patient-controlled epidural analgesia.电针对产妇自控硬膜外分娩镇痛中联合腰硬联合麻醉分娩镇痛过程中减轻疼痛和并发症的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jan;299(1):123-128. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4955-6. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
3
Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with acupoint injection for labor anesthesia reduces IL-1β/IL-10 ratio in maternal peripheral blood, umbilical cord blood and improves the labor outcomes: A prospective randomized controlled trial.腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉联合穴位注射用于分娩镇痛可降低产妇外周血、脐血中IL-1β/IL-10比值并改善分娩结局:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar;236:108935. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2022.108935. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
4
Clinical study on labor pain relief using the combined spinal-epidural analgesia and inhaling nitrous oxide.腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛与吸入氧化亚氮用于分娩镇痛的临床研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2002 Jul;37(7):398-401.
5
Acupoint Injection Decreases Anesthetic Cosumption during Combined Spinal-Epidural and Patient-Controlled Epidural Labor Analgesia.穴位注射降低腰硬联合与患者自控硬膜外分娩镇痛的麻醉药物用量。
Chin J Integr Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):257-262. doi: 10.1007/s11655-021-3501-8. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
6
[Influence of combined spinal-epidural analgesia and epidural analgesia on the progress of labor].腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛与硬膜外镇痛对产程的影响
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Jun;40(6):365-8.
7
Effects of Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia during Labor on Postpartum Electrophysiological Function of Maternal Pelvic Floor Muscle: A Randomized Controlled Trial.分娩期间联合脊髓硬膜外镇痛对产妇盆底肌肉产后电生理功能的影响:一项随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):e0137267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137267. eCollection 2015.
8
[Clinical study on relieving labor pain used combined spinal and epidural anesthesia].腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉用于分娩镇痛的临床研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1998 Sep;33(9):524-6.
9
Patient controlled intravenous analgesia with tramadol for labor pain relief.患者自控静脉注射曲马多用于分娩镇痛。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2003 Nov;116(11):1752-5.
10
Efficacy of patient-controlled epidural analgesia after initiation with epidural or combined spinal-epidural analgesia.硬膜外或腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛开始后患者自控硬膜外镇痛的效果
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007 Jul;16(3):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.02.007. Epub 2007 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of femoral nerve block and acupuncture analgesia for acute preoperative pain in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture: a retrospective study.老年股骨颈骨折患者术前急性疼痛的股神经阻滞与针刺镇痛比较:一项回顾性研究
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):1076-1083. eCollection 2022.
2
Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour.针灸或指压法用于分娩时的疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 7;2(2):CD009232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009232.pub2.