Center for Public Health & Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), US - Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA.
Inhal Toxicol. 2020 Feb;32(2):68-78. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2020.1737762. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
: The physiological mechanisms underlying the development of respiratory hypersensitivity to cisplatin (CDDP) are not well-understood. It has been suggested that these reactions are likely the result of type I hypersensitivity, but other explanations are plausible and the potential for CDDP to induce type I hypersensitivity responses has not been directly evaluated in an animal model. : To investigate CDDP hypersensitivity, mice were topically sensitized through application of CDDP before being challenged by oropharyngeal aspiration (OPA) with CDDP. Before and immediately after OPA challenge, pulmonary responses were assessed using whole body plethysmography (WBP). : CDDP did not induce an immediate response or alter the respiratory rate in sensitized mice. Two days later, baseline enhanced pause (Penh) values were significantly elevated ( < 0.05) in mice challenged with CDDP. When challenged with methacholine (Mch) aerosol, Penh values were significantly elevated ( < 0.05) in sensitized mice and respiratory rate was reduced ( < 0.05). Lymph node cell counts and immunoglobulin E levels also indicated successful sensitization to CDDP. Irrespective of the sensitization state of the mice, the number of neutrophils increased significantly in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) following CDDP challenge. BALF from sensitized mice also contained 2.46 (±0.8) × 10 eosinophils compared to less than 0.48 (±0.2) × 10 cells in non-sensitized mice ( < 0.05). : The results from this study indicate that dermal exposure to CDDP induces immunological changes consistent with type I hypersensitivity and that a single respiratory challenge is enough to trigger pulmonary responses in dermally sensitized mice. These data provide previously unknown insights into the mechanisms of CDDP hypersensitivity.
顺铂(CDDP)导致呼吸道过敏反应的生理机制尚不清楚。有人认为这些反应可能是 I 型过敏反应的结果,但也有其他解释,而且 CDDP 诱导 I 型过敏反应的可能性尚未在动物模型中直接评估。
为了研究 CDDP 过敏反应,在经口咽吸入(OPA)CDDP 前,用 CDDP 对小鼠进行皮肤致敏,然后进行 OPA 挑战。在 OPA 挑战之前和之后立即,使用全身 plethysmography(WBP)评估肺反应。
CDDP 没有引起致敏小鼠立即产生反应或改变呼吸频率。两天后,用 CDDP 挑战的小鼠的基础增强呼气暂停(Penh)值显著升高(<0.05)。用乙酰甲胆碱(Mch)气雾剂挑战时,致敏小鼠的 Penh 值显著升高(<0.05),呼吸频率降低(<0.05)。淋巴结细胞计数和免疫球蛋白 E 水平也表明对 CDDP 成功致敏。无论小鼠的致敏状态如何,用 CDDP 挑战后,支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中的中性粒细胞数量显著增加。与非致敏小鼠相比,致敏小鼠的 BALF 还含有 2.46(±0.8)×10 个嗜酸性粒细胞(<0.05)。
这项研究的结果表明,皮肤接触 CDDP 会引起与 I 型过敏反应一致的免疫变化,单次呼吸挑战足以引发皮肤致敏小鼠的肺部反应。这些数据为 CDDP 过敏反应的机制提供了以前未知的见解。