• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在严重心原性休克的猪模型中,血管活性药物治疗和机械左心室卸载的影响。

Impact of concomitant vasoactive treatment and mechanical left ventricular unloading in a porcine model of profound cardiogenic shock.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 4, Odense C, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2020 Mar 18;24(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2816-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-020-2816-8
PMID:32188462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7079533/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concomitant vasoactive drugs are often required to maintain adequate perfusion pressure in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) receiving hemodynamic support with an axial flow pump (Impella CP).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of equipotent dosages of epinephrine, dopamine, norepinephrine, and phenylephrine on cardiac work and end-organ perfusion in a porcine model of profound ischemic CS supported with an Impella CP.

METHODS

CS was induced in 10 pigs by stepwise intracoronary injection of polyvinyl microspheres. Hemodynamic support with Impella CP was initiated followed by blinded crossover to vasoactive treatment with norepinephrine (0.10 μg/kg/min), epinephrine (0.10 μg/kg/min), or dopamine (10 μg/kg/min) for 30 min each. At the end of the study, phenylephrine (10 μg/kg/min) was administered for 20 min. The primary outcome was cardiac workload, a product of pressure-volume area (PVA) and heart rate (HR), measured using the conductance catheter technique. End-organ perfusion was assessed by measuring venous oxygen saturation from the pulmonary artery (SvO), jugular bulb, and renal vein. Treatment effects were evaluated using multilevel mixed-effects linear regression.

RESULTS

All catecholamines significantly increased LV stroke work and cardiac work, dopamine to the greatest extend by 341.8 × 10 (mmHg × mL)/min [95% CI (174.1, 509.5), p < 0.0001], and SvO significantly improved during all catecholamines. Phenylephrine, a vasoconstrictor, caused a significant increase in cardiac work by 437.8 × 10 (mmHg × mL)/min [95% CI (297.9, 577.6), p < 0.0001] due to increase in potential energy (p = 0.001), but no significant change in LV stroke work. Also, phenylephrine tended to decrease SvO (p = 0.063) and increased arterial lactate levels (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Catecholamines increased end-organ perfusion at the expense of increased cardiac work, most by dopamine. However, phenylephrine increased cardiac work with no increase in end-organ perfusion.

摘要

背景

在接受轴向血流泵(Impella CP)血流动力学支持的急性心肌梗死(AMI)和心源性休克(CS)患者中,常需要同时使用血管活性药物来维持足够的灌注压。

目的

比较等剂量的肾上腺素、多巴胺、去甲肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素对使用 Impella CP 支持的严重缺血性 CS 猪模型中心脏做功和终末器官灌注的影响。

方法

通过逐步冠状动脉内注射聚氯乙烯微球诱导 10 头猪发生 CS。启动 Impella CP 血流动力学支持,然后进行盲法交叉至血管活性药物治疗,分别用去甲肾上腺素(0.10μg/kg/min)、肾上腺素(0.10μg/kg/min)或多巴胺(10μg/kg/min)治疗 30min。研究结束时,给予苯肾上腺素(10μg/kg/min)治疗 20min。主要结局指标是使用电导导管技术测量的压力-容积面积(PVA)和心率(HR)乘积的心脏工作量。终末器官灌注通过测量肺动脉(SvO)、颈静脉球和肾静脉的静脉血氧饱和度来评估。使用多级混合效应线性回归评估治疗效果。

结果

所有儿茶酚胺均显著增加 LV 射血做功和心脏做功,多巴胺增加最多,为 341.8×10(mmHg×mL)/min[95%置信区间(174.1,509.5),p<0.0001],SvO 在所有儿茶酚胺治疗期间均显著改善。血管收缩剂苯肾上腺素通过增加势能使心脏做功显著增加 437.8×10(mmHg×mL)/min[95%置信区间(297.9,577.6),p<0.0001],但 LV 射血做功无显著变化。此外,苯肾上腺素倾向于降低 SvO(p=0.063)并增加动脉乳酸水平(p=0.002)。

结论

儿茶酚胺以增加心脏做功为代价增加终末器官灌注,其中以多巴胺增加最多。然而,苯肾上腺素增加了心脏做功,而终末器官灌注没有增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f90/7079533/8ab11723dfa9/13054_2020_2816_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f90/7079533/a565f73f77b1/13054_2020_2816_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f90/7079533/9b79ccdd0441/13054_2020_2816_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f90/7079533/8ab11723dfa9/13054_2020_2816_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f90/7079533/a565f73f77b1/13054_2020_2816_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f90/7079533/9b79ccdd0441/13054_2020_2816_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f90/7079533/8ab11723dfa9/13054_2020_2816_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of concomitant vasoactive treatment and mechanical left ventricular unloading in a porcine model of profound cardiogenic shock.在严重心原性休克的猪模型中,血管活性药物治疗和机械左心室卸载的影响。
Crit Care. 2020 Mar 18;24(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2816-8.
2
Impella RP Versus Pharmacologic Vasoactive Treatment in Profound Cardiogenic Shock due to Right Ventricular Failure.Impella RP与药物血管活性治疗在右心室衰竭所致严重心源性休克中的对比研究
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2021 Dec;14(6):1021-1029. doi: 10.1007/s12265-021-10131-x. Epub 2021 May 11.
3
Impella CP or VA-ECMO in profound cardiogenic shock: left ventricular unloading and organ perfusion in a large animal model.Impella CP 或 VA-ECMO 在严重心源性休克中的应用:大型动物模型中的左心室卸载和器官灌注。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 8;14(15):e1585-e1592. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00684.
4
Haemodynamic implications of VA-ECMO vs. VA-ECMO plus Impella CP for cardiogenic shock in a large animal model.VA-ECMO 与 VA-ECMO 加 Impella CP 在大型动物模型中心源性休克中的血液动力学影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):2305-2313. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14780. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
5
Biventricular Compared to Left Ventricular Impella and Norepinephrine Support in a Porcine Model of Severe Cardiogenic Shock.在严重心源性休克的猪模型中,双心室与左心室 Impella 和去甲肾上腺素支持的比较。
ASAIO J. 2022 Sep 1;68(9):1141-1148. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001636. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
6
Unloading using Impella CP during profound cardiogenic shock caused by left ventricular failure in a large animal model: impact on the right ventricle.在大型动物模型中,使用Impella CP对因左心室衰竭导致的严重心源性休克进行卸载:对右心室的影响。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 Aug 12;8(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00326-y.
7
Impact of Impella RP Versus Vasoactive Treatment on Right and Left Ventricular Strain in a Porcine Model of Acute Cardiogenic Shock Induced by Right Coronary Artery Embolization.经右冠状动脉栓塞诱导的急性心源性休克猪模型中,Impella RP 与血管活性药物治疗对左右心室应变的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Feb 7;12(3):e8126. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027831. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
8
Transaortic or Pulmonary Artery Drainage for Left Ventricular Unloading in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support: A Porcine Cardiogenic Shock Model.经主动脉或肺动脉引流在脉管外生命支持中左心室卸荷:猪心源性休克模型。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Autumn;33(3):724-732. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
9
Discussion of hemodynamic optimization strategies and the canonical understanding of hemodynamics during biventricular mechanical support in cardiogenic shock: does the flow balance make the difference?探讨心源牲休克患者双心室机械支持时血流动力学优化策略和血流动力学的典型认识:流量平衡是否有差异?
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Apr;113(4):602-611. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02377-7. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
10
Beneficial Effects of Norepinephrine Alone on Cardiovascular Function and Tissue Oxygenation in a Pig Model of Cardiogenic Shock.去甲肾上腺素单独对心源性休克猪模型心血管功能和组织氧合的有益作用。
Shock. 2016 Aug;46(2):214-8. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000579.

引用本文的文献

1
The Immediate Cardiovascular and Mitochondrial Response in Ischemic Cardiogenic Shock.缺血性心源性休克时的即刻心血管和线粒体反应
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s12265-025-10647-6.
2
Higher vasoactive usage despite hemodynamic goals is associated with higher mortality in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock.尽管有血流动力学目标,但急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克中血管活性药物使用量较高与死亡率较高相关。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 13;12:1461714. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1461714. eCollection 2025.
3
Ventriculo-arterial coupling: from physiological concept to clinical application in peri-operative care and ICUs.

本文引用的文献

1
Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.机械循环支持在急性心肌梗死后心源性休克中的应用:Impella CP/5.0 与 ECMO 比较。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Mar;9(2):164-172. doi: 10.1177/2048872619865891. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
2
Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: a Danish cohort study.2010 年至 2017 年急性心肌梗死后心源性休克的发病率和患者特征的时间趋势:丹麦队列研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;21(11):1370-1378. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1566. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
3
心室-动脉耦合:从生理概念到围手术期护理和重症监护病房的临床应用
Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2022 Aug 3;1(2):e004. doi: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000004. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Temporary microaxial transvalvular left ventricular assist device for post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture: Bridging a paradigm shift.用于心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的临时微轴经瓣膜左心室辅助装置:跨越范式转变。
JTCVS Tech. 2024 Sep 4;28:97-108. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.08.019. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Mechanical circulatory support reduces renal sympathetic nerve activity in an ovine model of acute myocardial infarction.在急性心肌梗死绵羊模型中,机械循环支持可降低肾交感神经活性。
Clin Auton Res. 2025 Apr;35(2):193-203. doi: 10.1007/s10286-024-01086-5. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
6
Animal Models for Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Research Review.机械循环支持的动物模型:一项研究综述。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 29;25(10):351. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2510351. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Microaxial Flow Pump Hemodynamic and Metabolic Effects in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial.微轴流泵在梗死相关心源性休克中的血流动力学和代谢效应:DanGer休克随机临床试验的一项子研究
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jan 1;10(1):9-16. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4197.
8
Differential Effects of Pharmacologic and Mechanical Support on Right-Left Ventricular Coupling.药物和机械支持对左右心室耦联的影响差异。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024 Oct;17(5):1181-1192. doi: 10.1007/s12265-024-10522-w. Epub 2024 May 20.
9
Management and clinical outcomes of cardiogenic shock in King Abdulaziz University Hospital: A retrospective study.阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院心源性休克的管理和临床结局:一项回顾性研究。
Saudi Med J. 2023 May;44(5):479-485. doi: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.5.20220704.
10
The Use of Cardioprotective Devices and Strategies in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Procedures and Cardiac Surgery.经皮手术和心脏手术患者中心脏保护装置和策略的应用
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 11;11(8):1094. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081094.
Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Acute Severe Cardiogenic Shock Treated with the Impella Device.
采用 Impella 装置治疗急性重症心源性休克的死亡率及预后预测因素。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Aug 15;124(4):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.039. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Temporal Trends and Clinical Outcomes Associated with Vasopressor and Inotrope Use in The Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.血管加压素和儿茶酚胺类药物在心脏重症监护病房的使用与时间趋势和临床结果的关系。
Shock. 2020 Apr;53(4):452-459. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001390.
5
Inotropes and vasopressors use in cardiogenic shock: when, which and how much?正性肌力药和血管加压药在心源性休克中的应用:何时用、用哪种、用多少?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019 Aug;25(4):384-390. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000632.
6
Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.经皮 Impella 辅助治疗伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死。
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):1249-1258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036614.
7
Development and performance of a novel vasopressor-driven mortality prediction model in septic shock.新型血管升压药驱动的脓毒性休克死亡率预测模型的开发与性能
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Nov 22;8(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0459-6.
8
Impella CP or VA-ECMO in profound cardiogenic shock: left ventricular unloading and organ perfusion in a large animal model.Impella CP 或 VA-ECMO 在严重心源性休克中的应用:大型动物模型中的左心室卸载和器官灌注。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 8;14(15):e1585-e1592. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00684.
9
Treatments targeting inotropy.针对心肌收缩力的治疗方法。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Nov 21;40(44):3626-3644. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy600.
10
Mechanical Unloading in Heart Failure.心力衰竭的机械卸载。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 31;72(5):569-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.038. Epub 2018 Jul 2.