• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微轴流泵在梗死相关心源性休克中的血流动力学和代谢效应:DanGer休克随机临床试验的一项子研究

Microaxial Flow Pump Hemodynamic and Metabolic Effects in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Udesen Nanna Louise Junker, Beske Rasmus Paulin, Hassager Christian, Jensen Lisette Okkels, Eiskjær Hans, Mangner Norman, Polzin Amin, Schulze P Christian, Skurk Carsten, Nordbeck Peter, Clemmensen Peter, Panoulas Vasileios, Zimmer Sebastian, Schäfer Andreas, Werner Nikos, Frydland Martin, Holmvang Lene, Kjærgaard Jesper, Engstøm Thomas, Schmidt Henrik, Junker Anders, Terkelsen Christian Juhl, Christensen Steffen, Linke Axel, Møller Jacob Eifer

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jan 1;10(1):9-16. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4197.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4197
PMID:39462240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11513791/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Mechanical circulatory support with a microaxial flow pump (MAFP) has been shown to improve survival in ST-elevation myocardial infarction-induced cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS). Understanding the impact on hemodynamic stability over time is crucial for optimizing patient treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if an MAFP reduces the need for pharmacological circulatory support without compromising hemodynamics compared with standard care in STEMI-CS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a substudy of the Danish-German (DanGer) Shock trial, an international, multicenter, open-label randomized clinical trial. Patients from 14 heart centers across Denmark, Germany, and the UK were enrolled. Inclusion criteria for the trial were STEMI and systolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg or ongoing vasopressor treatment, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 45%, and arterial lactate level greater than 2.5 mmol/L. Of the enrolled patients, after exclusions from death in the catheterization laboratory or immediately on intensive care unit (ICU) admission, the remaining patients had serial recordings of hemodynamics, arterial lactate, and use of vasoactive drugs. Patients who were in comas after cardiac arrest and patients with mechanical complications or right ventricular failure were excluded. Data were analyzed from May to September 2024.

INTERVENTIONS

MAFP and standard of care or standard of care alone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Hemodynamic status in terms of heart rate and blood pressure, metabolic status in terms of arterial lactate concentration, and vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS). The clinical events during the first 72 hours were as follows: death from all causes, escalation of mechanical circulatory support, and discharge alive from the ICU.

RESULTS

From 355 enrolled patients, 324 (mean [IQR] age, 68 [58-75] years; 259 male [80%]) underwent ICU treatment (169 [52%] in the MAFP group, 155 [48%] in the standard-care group). Baseline characteristics were balanced. There was no difference in heart rate between groups, and mean arterial pressure was above the treatment target of 65 mm Hg in both groups but was achieved with a lower VIS in the MAFP group. No difference in arterial lactate level was found between groups at randomization, but on arrival to the ICU, the MAFP group had significantly lower arterial lactate levels compared with the standard-care group (mean difference, 1.3 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.7-1.9 mmol/L), a difference that persisted throughout the first 24 hours of observation. The MAFP group achieved lactate normalization (<2 mmol/L) 12 hours (95% CI, 5-18 hours) before the standard-care group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Use of a MAFP reduces the use of vasopressors and inotropic medication while maintaining hemodynamic stability and achieving faster normalization of lactate level in patients with STEMI-CS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01633502.

摘要

重要性

已证明使用微轴流泵(MAFP)进行机械循环支持可提高ST段抬高型心肌梗死所致心源性休克(STEMI-CS)患者的生存率。了解随时间推移对血流动力学稳定性的影响对于优化患者治疗至关重要。

目的

确定与STEMI-CS的标准治疗相比,MAFP在不影响血流动力学的情况下是否减少了对药物循环支持的需求。

设计、设置和参与者:这是丹麦-德国(DanGer)休克试验的一项子研究,该试验是一项国际多中心、开放标签的随机临床试验。招募了来自丹麦、德国和英国14个心脏中心的患者。该试验的纳入标准为STEMI且收缩压低于100 mmHg或正在进行血管升压药治疗、左心室射血分数低于45%以及动脉血乳酸水平高于2.5 mmol/L。在纳入的患者中,排除在导管室死亡或入住重症监护病房(ICU)后立即死亡的患者后,其余患者进行了血流动力学、动脉血乳酸和血管活性药物使用情况的系列记录。心脏骤停后昏迷的患者以及有机械并发症或右心室衰竭的患者被排除。数据于2024年5月至9月进行分析。

干预措施

MAFP与标准治疗或仅标准治疗。

主要结局和指标

心率和血压方面的血流动力学状态、动脉血乳酸浓度方面的代谢状态以及血管活性-正性肌力评分(VIS)。最初72小时内的临床事件包括:各种原因导致的死亡、机械循环支持的升级以及从ICU存活出院。

结果

355名纳入患者中,324名(平均[四分位间距]年龄,68[58 - 75]岁;259名男性[80%])接受了ICU治疗(MAFP组169名[52%],标准治疗组155名[48%])。基线特征均衡。两组心率无差异,两组平均动脉压均高于65 mmHg的治疗目标,但MAFP组通过较低的VIS达到该目标。随机分组时两组动脉血乳酸水平无差异,但到达ICU时,MAFP组动脉血乳酸水平显著低于标准治疗组(平均差值,1.3 mmol/L;95%置信区间,0.7 - 1.9 mmol/L),这一差异在观察的前24小时内持续存在。MAFP组比标准治疗组提前12小时(95%置信区间,5 - 18小时)实现乳酸正常化(<2 mmol/L)。

结论及相关性

使用MAFP可减少血管升压药和正性肌力药物的使用,同时维持STEMI-CS患者的血流动力学稳定性并更快实现乳酸水平正常化。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01633502。

相似文献

1
Microaxial Flow Pump Hemodynamic and Metabolic Effects in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial.微轴流泵在梗死相关心源性休克中的血流动力学和代谢效应:DanGer休克随机临床试验的一项子研究
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jan 1;10(1):9-16. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4197.
2
Treating Older Patients in Cardiogenic Shock With a Microaxial Flow Pump: Is it DANGERous?使用微轴流泵治疗心源性休克的老年患者:这危险吗?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Feb 18;85(6):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
Microaxial Flow Pump Use and Renal Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial.微轴流泵在梗死相关心源性休克中的应用及肾脏结局:DanGer休克试验的二次分析
Circulation. 2024 Dec 17;150(25):1990-2003. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072370. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
4
Rationale and design of DanGer shock: Danish-German cardiogenic shock trial.背景和设计:丹麦-德国心原性休克试验(DanGer 休克试验)。
Am Heart J. 2019 Aug;214:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 6.
5
DanGer Shock-like profile predicts the outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock.危险休克样特征可预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死相关心源性休克的预后。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Aug;12(4):2759-2768. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15269. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
6
Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.微轴流泵与常规治疗在梗死相关性心源性休克中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1382-1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312572. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
7
Improved Outcomes Associated with the use of Shock Protocols: Updates from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative.休克方案的应用与改善预后相关:国家心源性休克倡议的最新进展。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 1;93(7):1173-1183. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28307. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
8
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
9
Breaking Down Cardiogenic Shock: An Analytical Reflection on the DanGer-SHOCK and ECLS-SHOCK Trials.剖析心源性休克:对DanGer-SHOCK和ECLS-SHOCK试验的分析反思
Am J Cardiol. 2025 Feb 1;236:30-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.032. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
10
Microaxial flow pump (Impella CP®) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.微轴流泵(Impella CP®)在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用。
Kardiol Pol. 2024;82(7-8):702-707. doi: 10.33963/v.phj.102017. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Vascular (dys)function in the failing heart.衰竭心脏中的血管(功能失调)功能
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Jun 22. doi: 10.1038/s41569-025-01163-w.
2
Tricuspid regurgitation and chronic kidney disease in patients with cardiogenic shock: Review of the literature and real-world experience from a single center.心源性休克患者的三尖瓣反流与慢性肾脏病:文献综述及单中心真实世界经验
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Jun 7;59:101716. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101716. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
DanGer Shock-like profile predicts the outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock.危险休克样特征可预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死相关心源性休克的预后。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Aug;12(4):2759-2768. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15269. Epub 2025 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporary mechanical circulatory support in infarct-related cardiogenic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials with 6-month follow-up.梗死相关心原性休克的临时机械循环支持:6 个月随访的随机试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 14;404(10457):1019-1028. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01448-X. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
2
The DanGer Shock trial: a new dawn but much to uncover.危险休克试验:新的曙光,但仍有许多有待揭示。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Oct 14;45(39):4181-4183. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae516.
3
Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.微轴流泵与常规治疗在梗死相关性心源性休克中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1382-1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312572. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
4
Impella and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.在急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克中使用Impella和静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Nov;25(11):2021-2031. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3025. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
5
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗与梗死相关心原性休克患者:随机试验的个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2023 Oct 14;402(10410):1338-1346. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01607-0. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
6
Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.体外生命支持在与梗死相关的心原性休克中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 5;389(14):1286-1297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307227. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
7
Step by step daily management of short-term mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock in adults in the intensive cardiac care unit: a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care of the European Society of Cardiology SC, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the European branch of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization, and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.成人重症心脏监护病房中心源性休克短期机械循环支持的逐步日常管理:欧洲心脏病学会急性心血管护理协会、欧洲重症监护医学学会、体外生命支持组织欧洲分会及欧洲心胸外科学会的临床共识声明
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023 Jul 7;12(7):475-485. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad064.
8
Danish-German cardiogenic shock trial-DanGer shock: Trial design update.丹麦-德国心源性休克试验-DanGer休克:试验设计更新
Am Heart J. 2023 Jan;255:90-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.10.078. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
9
Joint EAPCI/ACVC expert consensus document on percutaneous ventricular assist devices.经皮心室辅助装置的 EAPCI/ACVC 专家共识文件
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Jun 30;10(5):570-583. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab015.
10
Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持装置的情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037748. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37748.