Bridgham R G, Munger B, Reinhart M A, Keefe C, Maatsch J L
Office of Medical Education Research and Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824.
Res Med Educ. 1988;27:133-8.
Scores, ratings of score validity, and the precision of scores were compared for four methods of assessing clinical performance by case review that differ primarily in the communication allowed between physician and assessor. Results indicate that, at least for board-certified physicians, scores and ratings of score validity are significantly improved by increased communication.
通过病例回顾对四种评估临床绩效的方法进行了比较,这些方法主要在医生与评估者之间允许的沟通方式上有所不同,比较内容包括分数、分数有效性评级以及分数的精确性。结果表明,至少对于获得委员会认证的医生而言,增加沟通可显著提高分数及分数有效性评级。