• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对执业医师能力的合理评估。

Defensible assessment of the competency of the practicing physician.

作者信息

Cunnington J P, Hanna E, Turnhbull J, Kaigas T B, Norman G R

机构信息

Phsician Review Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1997 Jan;72(1):9-12.

PMID:9008561
Abstract

When a physician's license to practice is at stake, professional acceptance and legal challenge are concerns for an organization undertaking competency assessments for practicing physicians. In 1995 the Physician Review and Enhancement Program (PREP), a program of McMaster University sponsored by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, underwent an external review by evaluation experts. As a result, one of the four assessment tools, the Structured Office Oral, was dropped, as it was insufficiently structured to be reliable and because it did not add significantly to the other tools. The content of all assessment tools was revised based on a PREP-developed blueprint for family practice. The multiple-choice questions (MCQs) were upgraded through collaboration with Canada's physician-accrediting body, the Medical Council of Canada (MCC), by the physician assessors, who chose MCQs according to the blueprint from the MCC question bank. The standardized-patient assessment was also refined by these physicians, who developed scenarios of standardized clinical cases with predefined performance criteria. Finally, through collaboration with the American Board of Emergency Medicine, a chart-stimulated recall test, in which the physician's own patient records are used to assess the physician's practice behavior, was restructured to ensure objectivity in standardization and interpretation. The result of these changes in the assessment tools is a more standardized and structured program of assessing physicians' competencies.

摘要

当医生的执业许可面临风险时,对于一个为执业医生进行能力评估的组织来说,专业认可和法律挑战是需要关注的问题。1995年,由安大略省医师协会赞助的麦克马斯特大学的医师审查与提升项目(PREP)接受了评估专家的外部审查。结果,四种评估工具之一的结构化门诊口试被淘汰,因为它的结构不够完善,缺乏可靠性,而且对其他工具没有显著补充。所有评估工具的内容都根据PREP制定的家庭医疗蓝图进行了修订。多项选择题(MCQ)通过与加拿大医师认证机构——加拿大医学委员会(MCC)合作进行了升级,医师评估人员根据MCC题库中的蓝图选择MCQ。标准化病人评估也由这些医生进行了完善,他们制定了具有预定义表现标准的标准化临床病例场景。最后,通过与美国急诊医学委员会合作,对图表激发回忆测试进行了重新构建,该测试使用医生自己的患者记录来评估医生的执业行为,以确保标准化和解释的客观性。评估工具的这些变化带来了一个更加标准化和结构化的医生能力评估项目。

相似文献

1
Defensible assessment of the competency of the practicing physician.对执业医师能力的合理评估。
Acad Med. 1997 Jan;72(1):9-12.
2
Assessing interviewing skills: the simulated office oral examination.评估面试技巧:模拟办公室口试。
J Fam Pract. 1986 Dec;23(6):567-71.
3
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
4
Continuing medical education-driven skills acquisition and impact on improved patient outcomes in family practice setting.继续医学教育驱动的技能获取及其对家庭医疗环境中改善患者结局的影响。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2000 Winter;20(1):52-61. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340200109.
5
Evaluation of a problem-based learning workshop using pre- and post-test objective structured clinical examinations and standardized patients.采用测试前和测试后客观结构化临床考试及标准化病人对基于问题的学习工作坊进行评估。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2000 Summer;20(3):164-70. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340200305.
6
Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.医师能力评估中的多源反馈
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003 Winter;23(1):4-12. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340230103.
7
Toward meeting the challenge of physician competence assessment: the University of California, San Diego Physician Assessment and Clinical Education (PACE) Program.应对医师能力评估挑战:加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校医师评估与临床教育(PACE)项目。
Acad Med. 2009 Aug;84(8):1008-14. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ad199c.
8
Assessment of clinical skills in medical practice.医学实践中临床技能的评估。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003 Summer;23(3):182-90. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340230310.
9
Using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess multiple physician competencies in postgraduate training.使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评估研究生培训中的多种医师能力。
Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):183-91. doi: 10.1080/01421590701302290.
10
Promoting physicians' self-assessment and quality improvement: the ABIM diabetes practice improvement module.促进医生的自我评估与质量提升:美国内科医学委员会糖尿病实践改进模块
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Spring;26(2):109-19. doi: 10.1002/chp.59.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder intention to engage in fidelity measurement methods in community mental health settings: A mixed methods study.利益相关者在社区心理健康环境中采用保真度测量方法的意向:一项混合方法研究。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Aug 2;3:26334895221114664. doi: 10.1177/26334895221114664. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
Implementing nudges for suicide prevention in real-world environments: project INSPIRE study protocol.在现实环境中实施预防自杀的助推措施:INSPIRE项目研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 26;6:143. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00686-y. eCollection 2020.
3
A scoping review of the potential for chart stimulated recall as a clinical research method.
一项关于图表激发回忆作为一种临床研究方法的潜力的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2539-y.
4
A randomized trial to identify accurate and cost-effective fidelity measurement methods for cognitive-behavioral therapy: project FACTS study protocol.一项旨在确定认知行为疗法准确且具成本效益的保真度测量方法的随机试验:FACTS项目研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 15;16(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1034-z.
5
A Case for Caution: Chart-Stimulated Recall.需谨慎对待的一个案例:图表激发式回忆
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):531-5. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00011.1.
6
Family physician practice visits arising from the Alberta Physician Achievement Review.基于艾伯塔省医生绩效评估的家庭医生就诊情况。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Sep 9;13:121. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-121.
7
"Push" versus "Pull" for mobilizing pain evidence into practice across different health professions: a protocol for a randomized trial.“推动”与“拉动”:在不同健康专业领域中推动疼痛证据转化实践的随机试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Nov 24;7:115. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-115.
8
Structured teaching and assessment: a new chart-stimulated recall worksheet for family medicine residents.结构化教学与评估:一种用于家庭医学住院医师的新型图表激发回忆工作表
Can Fam Physician. 2010 Sep;56(9):958-9, e352-4.
9
Defining the effect and mediators of two knowledge translation strategies designed to alter knowledge, intent and clinical utilization of rehabilitation outcome measures: a study protocol [NCT00298727].定义旨在改变康复结局测量的知识、意图和临床应用的两种知识转化策略的效果及介导因素:一项研究方案 [NCT00298727]
Implement Sci. 2006 Jul 4;1:14. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-14.
10
Revalidation of doctors in Canada.加拿大医生的重新认证
BMJ. 1999 Oct 30;319(7218):1188-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7218.1188.