Suppr超能文献

定量磷酸化蛋白质组学揭示不同作用模式的化学应激物对细胞的反应。

Quantitative phosphoproteomics to unravel the cellular response to chemical stressors with different modes of action.

机构信息

Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Proteomics Program, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3b, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2020 May;94(5):1655-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02712-7. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

Abstract

Damage to cellular macromolecules and organelles by chemical exposure evokes activation of various stress response pathways. To what extent different chemical stressors activate common and stressor-specific pathways is largely unknown. Here, we used quantitative phosphoproteomics to compare the signaling events induced by four stressors with different modes of action: the DNA damaging agent: cisplatin (CDDP), the topoisomerase II inhibitor: etoposide (ETO), the pro-oxidant: diethyl maleate (DEM) and the immunosuppressant: cyclosporine A (CsA) administered at an equitoxic dose to mouse embryonic stem cells. We observed major differences between the stressors in the number and identity of responsive phosphosites and the amplitude of phosphorylation. Kinase motif and pathway analyses indicated that the DNA damage response (DDR) activation by CDDP occurs predominantly through the replication-stress-related Atr kinase, whereas ETO triggers the DDR through Atr as well as the DNA double-strand-break-associated Atm kinase. CsA shares with ETO activation of CK2 kinase. Congruent with their known modes of action, CsA-mediated signaling is related to down-regulation of pathways that control hematopoietic differentiation and immunity, whereas oxidative stress is the most prominent initiator of DEM-modulated stress signaling. This study shows that even at equitoxic doses, different stressors induce distinctive and complex phosphorylation signaling cascades.

摘要

化学暴露对细胞大分子和细胞器的损伤会引发各种应激反应途径的激活。不同的化学应激源在多大程度上激活共同的和应激特异性的途径在很大程度上是未知的。在这里,我们使用定量磷酸化蛋白质组学来比较四种作用模式不同的应激源诱导的信号事件:DNA 损伤剂顺铂(CDDP)、拓扑异构酶 II 抑制剂依托泊苷(ETO)、促氧化剂马来酸二乙酯(DEM)和免疫抑制剂环孢素 A(CsA),它们以等效毒性剂量施用于小鼠胚胎干细胞。我们观察到应激源在响应磷酸化位点的数量和身份以及磷酸化的幅度方面存在显著差异。激酶基序和途径分析表明,CDDP 引起的 DNA 损伤反应(DDR)主要通过与复制应激相关的 Atr 激酶发生,而 ETO 通过 Atr 以及与 DNA 双链断裂相关的 Atm 激酶触发 DDR。CsA 与 ETO 共同激活 CK2 激酶。与它们已知的作用模式一致,CsA 介导的信号与控制造血分化和免疫的途径的下调有关,而氧化应激是 DEM 调节的应激信号的最主要启动子。这项研究表明,即使在等效毒性剂量下,不同的应激源也会诱导独特而复杂的磷酸化信号级联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验