Institute of Toxicology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.
Institute of Toxicology, University Medical Center Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Strasse 67, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2020 Jun;1867(6):118678. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118678. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
The endothelium contributes to the pathophysiology of adverse effects caused by conventional (genotoxic) anticancer therapeutics (cAT). The relevance of structurally different types of cAT-induced DNA lesions for eliciting selected endothelial stress responses is largely unknown. Here, we analyzed the cAT-induced formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), transcription blockage and DNA damage response (DDR) in time kinetic analyses employing a monolayer of primary human endothelial cells (HUVEC). We observed that the degree of cAT-induced transcription blockage, the number of DSB and activation of DDR-related factors diverge. For instance, ionizing radiation caused the formation of numerous DSB and triggerd a substantial activation of ATM/Chk2 signaling, which however were not accompanied by a significant transcription inhibition. By contrast, the DNA cross-linking cAT cisplatin triggered a rapid and substantial blockage of transcription, which yet was not reflected by an appreciable number of DSB or increased levels of pATM/pChk2. In general, cAT-stimulated ATM-dependent phosphorylation of Kap1 (Ser824) and p53 (Ser15) reflected best cAT-induced transcription blockage. In conclusion, cAT-induced formation of DSB and profound activation of prototypical DDR factors is independent of the inhibition of RNA polymerase II-regulated transcription in an endothelial monolayer. We suggest that DSB formed directly or indirectly following cAT-treatment do not act as comprehensive triggers of superior signaling pathways shutting-down transcription while, at the same time, causing an appreciable stimulation of the DDR. Rather, it appears that distinct cAT-induced DNA lesions elicit diverging signaling pathways, which separately control transcription vs. DDR activity in the endothelium.
内皮细胞有助于解释传统(遗传毒性)抗癌治疗药物(cAT)引起的不良反应的病理生理学。不同结构类型的 cAT 诱导的 DNA 损伤在引发特定的内皮应激反应方面的相关性在很大程度上尚不清楚。在这里,我们分析了使用单层原代人内皮细胞(HUVEC)进行时间动力学分析时,cAT 诱导的 DNA 双链断裂(DSB)、转录阻断和 DNA 损伤反应(DDR)的形成。我们观察到,cAT 诱导的转录阻断程度、DSB 的数量和 DDR 相关因子的激活程度存在差异。例如,电离辐射会导致大量 DSB 的形成,并触发 ATM/Chk2 信号的大量激活,但这并不伴随着明显的转录抑制。相比之下,DNA 交联 cAT 顺铂会迅速且大量地阻断转录,但这并不反映在明显数量的 DSB 或增加的 pATM/pChk2 水平上。一般来说,cAT 刺激的 Kap1(Ser824)和 p53(Ser15)的 ATM 依赖性磷酸化最能反映 cAT 诱导的转录阻断。总之,在血管内皮细胞单层中,cAT 诱导的 DSB 形成和典型 DDR 因子的深激活与 RNA 聚合酶 II 调节的转录抑制无关。我们认为,cAT 处理后直接或间接形成的 DSB 不作为全面关闭转录的高级信号通路的触发因素,同时,显著刺激 DDR。相反,似乎不同的 cAT 诱导的 DNA 损伤会引发不同的信号通路,分别控制内皮细胞中的转录与 DDR 活性。