Rivierduinen Institute for Mental Health, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Jul;47(4):632-640. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01031-4.
To test whether: (1) psychiatrists will prescribe clozapine more often if they can delegate the monitoring tasks to an advanced nurse practitioner (ANP), (2) clozapine monitoring by an ANP is at least as safe as monitoring by a psychiatrist. Patients from 23 Dutch outpatient teams were assessed for an indication for clozapine. ANPs affiliated to these teams were randomized to Condition A: clozapine monitoring by an ANP, or Condition B: monitoring by the psychiatrist. The safety of monitoring was evaluated by determining whether the weekly neutrophil measurements were performed. Staff and patients were blinded regarding the first hypothesis. Of the 173 patients with an indication for clozapine at baseline, only seven in Condition A and four in Condition B were prescribed clozapine (Odds Ratio = 2.24, 95% CI 0.61-8.21; p = 0.225). These low figures affected the power of this study. When we considered all patients who started with clozapine over the 15-month period (N = 49), the Odds Ratio was 1.90 (95% CI 0.93-3.87; p = 0.078). With regard to the safety of the monitoring of the latter group of patients, 71.2% of the required neutrophil measurements were performed in condition A and 67.3% in condition B (OR = 0.98; CI = 0.16-3.04; p = 0.98). Identifying patients with an indication for clozapine does not automatically lead to improved prescription rates, even when an ANP is available for the monitoring. Clozapine-monitoring performed by an ANP seemed as safe as that by a psychiatrist.
检验(1)如果精神科医生可以将监测任务委托给高级执业护师(ANP),他们是否会更频繁地开氯氮平处方;(2)ANP 进行氯氮平监测是否至少与精神科医生监测一样安全。23 个荷兰门诊团队的患者接受氯氮平适应证评估。隶属于这些团队的 ANP 被随机分配至 A 条件:由 ANP 进行氯氮平监测,或 B 条件:由精神科医生进行监测。通过确定每周是否进行中性粒细胞测量来评估监测安全性。工作人员和患者对第一个假设均不知情。在基线时有氯氮平适应证的 173 名患者中,仅 A 条件下的 7 名和 B 条件下的 4 名患者开了氯氮平处方(优势比=2.24,95%置信区间 0.61-8.21;p=0.225)。这些低数字影响了本研究的效力。当我们考虑在 15 个月期间开始使用氯氮平的所有患者(N=49)时,优势比为 1.90(95%置信区间 0.93-3.87;p=0.078)。对于后一组患者监测的安全性,A 条件下完成了所需中性粒细胞测量的 71.2%,B 条件下完成了 67.3%(比值比=0.98;置信区间 0.16-3.04;p=0.98)。识别有氯氮平适应证的患者并不一定会自动提高处方率,即使有 ANP 可用于监测。由 ANP 进行的氯氮平监测似乎与精神科医生进行的监测一样安全。