Verma Nikhil, Jain Anuj, Pal Chander, Thomas Simon, Agarwal Shekhar, Garg Prateek
Delhi Institute of Trauma and Orthopaedics (DITO), Sant Parmanand Hospital, 18 Sham Nath Marg, Civil Lines, New Delhi, Delhi, 110054, India.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Mar;11(Suppl 2):S246-S254. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
Periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasty are relatively rare complication comprises to 0.3-2.5%. But these injuries are often complex and challenging for the surgeons due to ageing population in conjunction with severe osteoporosis. The management option varies from conservative to internal fixation or revision surgery. Thus this study was conducted to analyze the results of various methods of treatment of periprosthetic fractures following TKA and to form the optimal treatment guidelines for fixation or revision.
51 cases diagnosed with periprosthetic fracture were enrolled and underwent surgical intervention. Type of primary prosthesis, interval between TKA and periprosthetic fracture, type of fracture, prosthesis stability and mode of fixation of fracture, any revision surgery and complication were noted.
The mean age of all patients was 65.89 years. The mean interval between the index surgery and periprosthetic fracture was 6 years (Range 2 months to 10 years) in male and 18.5 months (Range 4 days to 7 years) in female. 44 (86%) fractures were femoral, 4 (8%) fractures were tibial and 3 (6%) fractures were of patella. The mean knee society score (KSS) & oxford knee score (OKS) were found to be good for revision group as compared to the fixation group at final follow up.
In presence of poor bone stock, far distal fracture configuration, comminution, severe osteoporosis, difficulty in achieving stability with plates & old age-revision TKA is a viable option with stemmed components.
全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折是一种相对罕见的并发症,发生率为0.3%-2.5%。但由于人口老龄化以及严重骨质疏松,这些损伤对外科医生来说往往很复杂且具有挑战性。治疗方案从保守治疗到内固定或翻修手术不等。因此,本研究旨在分析全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折的各种治疗方法的结果,并形成固定或翻修的最佳治疗指南。
纳入51例诊断为假体周围骨折的患者并进行手术干预。记录初次假体类型、全膝关节置换术与假体周围骨折之间的间隔时间、骨折类型、假体稳定性和骨折固定方式、是否进行任何翻修手术及并发症。
所有患者的平均年龄为65.89岁。初次手术与假体周围骨折之间的平均间隔时间,男性为6年(范围2个月至10年),女性为18.5个月(范围4天至7年)。44例(86%)骨折发生在股骨,4例(8%)骨折发生在胫骨,3例(6%)骨折发生在髌骨。在末次随访时,与固定组相比,翻修组的平均膝关节协会评分(KSS)和牛津膝关节评分(OKS)较好。
在骨量差、骨折部位距假体远端远、粉碎性骨折、严重骨质疏松、使用钢板难以实现稳定性以及老年患者中,带柄组件的翻修全膝关节置换术是一种可行的选择。